Re: Classic American West Coast Boxing
Posted: 22 Dec 2010, 17:54






Tom, as far as westerns go,the westerns made in the last 30 years to me seem to be missing something, maybe its John Wayneraylawpc wrote:Well, I saw "The Fighter" last night. All I can say about the movie is that it's another "boxing movie" that really isn't about boxing. . .
I'm planning to see "True Grit" when it comes out . . . hopefully, it will be an Old West movie that's really about the Old West . . .
THEHAMMER321 wrote:Tom, as far as westerns go,the westerns made in the last 30 years to me seem to be missing something, maybe its John Wayneraylawpc wrote:Well, I saw "The Fighter" last night. All I can say about the movie is that it's another "boxing movie" that really isn't about boxing. . .
I'm planning to see "True Grit" when it comes out . . . hopefully, it will be an Old West movie that's really about the Old West . . .![]()
Thanks Rick......Rick Farris wrote:Frank wrote:
Thanks Charlie for your kind words, but I'm not "sharp as a tack". I wish my memory was as good as Rick's, Hap's and Don Fraser's, but truth be told, it is not, though Hap and Don have some years on me they have a better memory then I. As some of the guys here know I went through a bout with cancer and a treatment that left me with short and long term memory loss, I can't remember enough to write much of anything. The stories that I have written are fiction, though I use little bits of my life experience to write them, an I have to say its been fun writing them.
-----------------------------------------------------
Frank, I'm not just being kind when I say that your memory is at the foundation of this thread. It's human nature for a person's recall to be affected by age, medication, etc. however, I hope my memory is as good as yours, Hap's and Don's as I age. You can say all you want about medication, and I'm sure it has had some effect, but as far as I am concerned, "Sharp as a tack" is appropriate in describing your memory! My opinion.
Paul, Tony had a chance to beat any fighter that would stand in front of him and go toe to toe with him, the boxers/movers were the ones he has trouble with, so yes I agree with your above post.....THEHAMMER321 wrote:You know Frank, I admire your honesty about Frankies chances vs AA, but Tony on the other hand, I would have given him a chance versus all of the lightweights even Aaron Pryor because of Pryors wide open style, Mancini same thing wide open, Rosario would have been a great fight, the guys who would have been the most difficult for Tony in my opinion would have been Tyrone Crawley, and Livingstone Bramble,oh I almost forgot another couple of guys Tony could have fought at jr wetler Gene Hatcher or Bruce Curry, both of those guys would have been open for the left hook.kikibalt wrote:Most people in the Los Angeles boxing community blame Harry Kabakoff for that, and I agree with that, I think Harry over protected Jessie. There were times when he could have gotten Jess a title fight but Harry would start yelling about the money and most people could see that that was his way of turning the fights down. By the way, Jackie mcCoy and I did just that when we were offered a title shot for Frankie against the great Alexis Arguello, we thought that Frankie at that point in 1979, I think it was in 1979, was not ready for AA, hell, he probably never would had been ready for AA, but any way we were offered 35k and we asked for 75k knowing that Don King would never go along with that, we lost on 35k, but I thing saved Frankie from an ass whipping, of course had AA not been the monster that he was we would had fought him for the 35k.THEHAMMER321 wrote:Frank I know you see Jesus Pimental at the CBOF functions, I was just reading some of my old boxing magazines, and they profiled his career in one I was reading last night,it talked about he had problems with Eileen Eaton and George Parnassus, and that was part of the reason he didn't get a title shot until he was over 30, do you know if the problems with Eaton and Parnassus were because of his manager.
raylawpc wrote:Well, I saw "The Fighter" last night. All I can say about the movie is that it's another "boxing movie" that really isn't about boxing. . .
I'm planning to see "True Grit" when it comes out . . . hopefully, it will be an Old West movie that's really about the Old West . . .
Or Walter BrennanTHEHAMMER321 wrote:Tom, as far as westerns go,the westerns made in the last 30 years to me seem to be missing something, maybe its John Wayneraylawpc wrote:Well, I saw "The Fighter" last night. All I can say about the movie is that it's another "boxing movie" that really isn't about boxing. . .
I'm planning to see "True Grit" when it comes out . . . hopefully, it will be an Old West movie that's really about the Old West . . .![]()
Yes, boxing was merely the backdrop. It could have been about a racecar driver or an NBA player, or even a door-to-door salesman.Rick Farris wrote:raylawpc wrote:Well, I saw "The Fighter" last night. All I can say about the movie is that it's another "boxing movie" that really isn't about boxing. . .
I'm planning to see "True Grit" when it comes out . . . hopefully, it will be an Old West movie that's really about the Old West . . .
Nope, it wasn't about boxing. In fact, little about Ward's career history was mentioned.
I didn't recognize or bother to reference any of the opponents names that were used.
I enjoyed the movie, but boxing seemed to be nothing more than a vehicle for a diffent story.
The sad reality is, pure boxing movies don't sell. Rocky sold, Ali didn't.
Cinderella Man made some money on it's star power, but wasn't great. The Raging Bull was done decades ago.
Tom, my Uncle did the original True Grit, as well as the sequel, Rooster Cogburn.
I have no expectations regarding the new version. The original was a great movie, and had the Duke.
Watching "True Grit" (1969} with John Wayne and Kim Darby on TMC......CNorkusJr wrote:Or Walter BrennanTHEHAMMER321 wrote:Tom, as far as westerns go,the westerns made in the last 30 years to me seem to be missing something, maybe its John Wayneraylawpc wrote:Well, I saw "The Fighter" last night. All I can say about the movie is that it's another "boxing movie" that really isn't about boxing. . .
I'm planning to see "True Grit" when it comes out . . . hopefully, it will be an Old West movie that's really about the Old West . . .![]()
![]()
I like some Clint Eastwood Westerns specifically: Outlaw Josie Wales & Unforgiven

kikibalt wrote:
kikibalt wrote:
Jackie Leonard (Hollywood Legion Stadium) & Truman Gibson (IBC)
Rick, I didn't see the Guder fight, I remember reading about it at the time. I did see Ramon T. fight a few times live and on local TV, I was at the Legion for his fights vs Aragon and Vince Martinez. Ramon was a good boxer who like you say wasn't a big puncher, He, Ramon, will be inducted into the CBHOF come June.Rick Farris wrote:Karl Heinz Guder vs Ramon Tiscareno . . .
Do you remember that one Frank? I saw it listed in one of the programs above. This would be Ticareno's last fight.
I've heard a lot about Tiscareno from you & Don Fraser.
I know he wasn't a big puncher, but it seems he was a good boxer? Any memories?
He fought some good fighters here, including Art Aragon, and scored some good wins, most by decison.

Rick Farris wrote:Boxing in L.A. on Xmas Day . . .
You know, Aileen Eaton, George Parnassus, Don Fraser and Don Chargin scheduled a lot of great fights on a variety of the 365 available days of the year.
But I can't remember one of them, or anybody else, scheduling boxing on Christmas day.
Well, two boxing cards will be held in Southern Cal on Xmas. One in Los Angeles, one in Ontario.
Why Christmas?
If you look in a small box above the names, the card tells you the weight classes and the assoc weight minimum/maximum.kikibalt wrote:
On this Hollywood Legion card you see that Joe Chavez is fighting a six rounder, this is the same Joe Chavez that you see working as a cut man in many of today's big fights.
"those thrilling days of yesteryear"CNorkusJr wrote:If you look in a small box above the names, the card tells you the weight classes and the assoc weight minimum/maximum.kikibalt wrote:
On this Hollywood Legion card you see that Joe Chavez is fighting a six rounder, this is the same Joe Chavez that you see working as a cut man in many of today's big fights.
.
8 divisions-either your in or your out- "those were the days".
And (for the most part) ONE champion for each of those eight divisions. Ah, the 50s: When men were men, and women were women, and champions were undisputed . . .CNorkusJr wrote:If you look in a small box above the names, the card tells you the weight classes and the assoc weight minimum/maximum.kikibalt wrote:
On this Hollywood Legion card you see that Joe Chavez is fighting a six rounder, this is the same Joe Chavez that you see working as a cut man in many of today's big fights.
3 months ago I attended a local card here on Long Island. Five guys in the row in front of me got into it (no punches) argueing over what the various weight limits that are out there today. They argued for two whole fights on the card and still didnt have it settled after.
It got to the point where it had me thinking about the limits for divisions like cruiserweight and Lt Heavyweight myself. Super-middleweight they couldnt even come close.
8 divisions-either your in or your out- those were the days.
When women wanted to be women......raylawpc wrote:
And (for the most part) ONE champion for each of those eight divisions. Ah, the 50s: When men were men, and women were women, and champions were undisputed . . .