Re: Betting thread
Posted: 16 Jul 2014, 15:09
Had a sneaky bet on Couzens over Buglioni tonight. Anyone else had a go tonight?
I can see Fury PTS for sure. Tyson is not a big hitter. Could be a classic British stoppage though if Ustinov gets a few in and looks to be making a fight of it.reggaereggae wrote:Ok here are some interesting picks I believe:
4.33 GGG pts. Geale is very tough and best G has fought
4.0 Fury PTs - both big, awkward lumps. I can see a messy fight with Fury edging on points (as long as Ustinov is genuinely fit!)
3.2 Ennis over Truax - neither are great, but I see this as an even fight.
The treble lands 55-1
It was listed as a 10 round fight. So the 66/1 is for one specific round in effect?Riddick Blowe wrote:Ustinov is 66/1 to win in rounds 10-12 (!) with 365. I assume this must be some kind of mistake? 66/1 for a single late round would be about right here. Anyway, I've had a little. Huge price.
Good point. But to my knowledge he has never been 'hurt' (correct me if I'm wrong) and I believe He is in top shape. GGG is spiteful but measured. I'm not confident about these bets :-)Riddick Blowe wrote:I can see Fury PTS for sure. Tyson is not a big hitter. Could be a classic British stoppage though if Ustinov gets a few in and looks to be making a fight of it.reggaereggae wrote:Ok here are some interesting picks I believe:
4.33 GGG pts. Geale is very tough and best G has fought
4.0 Fury PTs - both big, awkward lumps. I can see a messy fight with Fury edging on points (as long as Ustinov is genuinely fit!)
3.2 Ennis over Truax - neither are great, but I see this as an even fight.
The treble lands 55-1
I can't see Geale lasting 12 at all. The pressure GGG puts on is unbearable. Especially for a guy who isn't really a fleet footed, slick mover type who could get out of the way.
You're right. How are they allowed to do this? Fkin crooks. Totally misleading. Why are they offering 10-12 round odds here when it's a 10 rounder. I thought it was 12 obviously.Benelio wrote:It was listed as a 10 round fight. So the 66/1 is for one specific round in effect?Riddick Blowe wrote:Ustinov is 66/1 to win in rounds 10-12 (!) with 365. I assume this must be some kind of mistake? 66/1 for a single late round would be about right here. Anyway, I've had a little. Huge price.
Think they will void that RB, they are one of only two books left with 12 round betting at present, the groups rounds will end up being voided I would imagineRiddick Blowe wrote:You're right. How are they allowed to do this? Fkin crooks. Totally misleading. Why are they offering 10-12 round odds here when it's a 10 rounder. I thought it was 12 obviously.Benelio wrote:It was listed as a 10 round fight. So the 66/1 is for one specific round in effect?Riddick Blowe wrote:Ustinov is 66/1 to win in rounds 10-12 (!) with 365. I assume this must be some kind of mistake? 66/1 for a single late round would be about right here. Anyway, I've had a little. Huge price.
Geale has been down a fair bit.reggaereggae wrote: Good point. But to my knowledge he has never been 'hurt' (correct me if I'm wrong) and I believe He is in top shape. GGG is spiteful but measured. I'm not confident about these bets :-)
What was the price mate? Good Luck in the BJS fight. I seen Blandamura beat the Austrian guy in his last fight, high volume but low power. My only concern for your bet would be that BJS has a tendency to coast in fights.The Insider wrote:First one in with Gethin losing on points. Need Smith and BJS to win by K.O and were well in.
I thought Smith via stoppage was one of the best bets of the year (going with the early price).
Thanks - didn't know. I saw Truax win and Fury out so my bets ae sh1t unless GGG goes easyBoxing Prospect wrote:Geale has been down a fair bit.reggaereggae wrote: Good point. But to my knowledge he has never been 'hurt' (correct me if I'm wrong) and I believe He is in top shape. GGG is spiteful but measured. I'm not confident about these bets :-)
According to the boxrec comments he was "lucky to see out the round" (round 2) against Nonoy Gonzalez, decide for yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Hlyav533U
I think you mean 6/1 on Rudenko. It's a great (crazy) price. Browne is so limited, it really isn't going to take a very proficient fighter to beat him. From what I've seen of Rudenko, Browne should probably be favourite as he isn't quite as bad but I would price Rudenko at 5/2 maybe, definitely not 6/1.Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Lucas Browne 1/10 to beat Rudenko. Rudenko is pretty raw (not unlike Browne), and not always in the best shape but I quite fancy him here.
Looks good but I would go Wlad ptsreggaereggae wrote:Maybe I'm just looking for value here but:
Mayweather pts, Klit Ko, Porter win, Crawford win, Yoan Hernandez win returns 4-1 at paddy.
Most concerned about Klit Ko, given his safety first style
I know. It makes me nervous. I have only had a small bet thus far . I'm lacking in confidence after a dry periodRiddick Blowe wrote:Looks good but I would go Wlad ptsreggaereggae wrote:Maybe I'm just looking for value here but:
Mayweather pts, Klit Ko, Porter win, Crawford win, Yoan Hernandez win returns 4-1 at paddy.
Most concerned about Klit Ko, given his safety first style
Actually argh it's close. Pulev won't exactly be elusive but I think he brings enough offensively to make Wlad not commit to the right
Yeah, losing on Maduma vs Mitchell made me not put anything on Bundu. Which was a shame as I was pretty damn confident in Bundu winning.reggaereggae wrote:
I know. It makes me nervous. I have only had a small bet thus far . I'm lacking in confidence after a dry period