superpunchout wrote:But surely if team Hatton felt that way about Witter ( in that a potential loss would seriously jepordize both his earning potential and public profile) then it wasn't it a brilliant move not to take the fight?DG. wrote:Bottom line isn- if Hatton fought Witter all those uyears ago there would be no big pay days and the humilating knock out (Headbutting the ring post against PBF and Sleeping for 5 minutes agaisnt Pacman)against PBF and Pacman.
Haton knew it - his team knew it.
Mininmum risk and most money until you hit the big time and get exposed as a limited slugger!
Hatton Vs Witter 2009 - both past it and the gloss has gone from both.
Okay so most of the public now know that Hatton isn't an elite fighter, but he's made so much money en route to demonstrating this fact that he could live off the interest without ever denting the capital.
Retrospectively, wouldn't it have been foolhardy to risk throwing that all away just to appease a minority of critics? Especially as he was (as I'm sure you'll agree) in possession of natural ability that was of a distinctly finite quantity.
Personally I have a lot of respect for Ricky Hatton because he didn't foolishly offer his head to the chopping block at a point where a setback could have done irreparable damage to his future prospects.
It's a good point you make.
The thing I have a problem with though, is people saying Hatton never ducked Witter. You even accept he did, and commend him for it.