Re: Josh Warrington vs Hisashi Amagasa RBR
Posted: 20 Apr 2016, 08:03
Okay then, did Hall dominate Haskins, but get screwed over by the judges?CharlesListon wrote:Really? Come on Horsey.
Okay then, did Hall dominate Haskins, but get screwed over by the judges?CharlesListon wrote:Really? Come on Horsey.
Absolutely not. I was ringside. In my opinion the scoring was fair and accurate. Hall looked as though he knew he'd been well beaten.Horse wrote:Okay then, did Hall dominate Haskins, but get screwed over by the judges?CharlesListon wrote:Really? Come on Horsey.
You obviously weren't there then.CharlesListon wrote:Absolutely not. I was ringside. In my opinion the scoring was fair and accurate. Hall looked as though he knew he'd been well beaten.
I learnt that Fury lacks one punch power, but his volume of punches hurts opponents.
Eubank Jr is a spiteful puncher and Jody Meikle could have won if he wanted to.
you must have been sat next to me then as I was ringside with me boys and all our group and the supporters in the area and the large group that I spoke to thought haskins lost and the whole arena went quiet waiting for the result which is not normal in all the events ive been to and there was no sign on my nephews face that he thought he lost, he thought he won because haskins spent most of the time punching his gloves and guard. Haskins is not a hard puncher.CharlesListon wrote:Ha!
My memory is very good. I was sat very closely to the ring and scored the fight myself widely to Haskins.
I don't think there is any need for further debate from any parties involved.
There where only about 100 or so of us, he fought to a plan before getting carried away. His boxing is what the trainer is working on use of the jab etc.Autobarn wrote:I wanted more from Hall. Landed quality shots on Guerrero but could've forced the issue a bit more. Not much variety.
Don't think he's the same fighter who had those great fights with Jamie McDonnell and Vusi Malinga.
His fans, I got the impression, would cheer anything.
Three rows from ring in Stuart's cornerAutobarn wrote:There were more than 100 cheering, I thought.
Where were you all sitting?
nick885 wrote:you must have been sat next to me then as I was ringside with me boys and all our group and the supporters in the area and the large group that I spoke to thought haskins lost and the whole arena went quiet waiting for the result which is not normal in all the events ive been to and there was no sign on my nephews face that he thought he lost, he thought he won because haskins spent most of the time punching his gloves and guard. Haskins is not a hard puncher.CharlesListon wrote:Ha!
My memory is very good. I was sat very closely to the ring and scored the fight myself widely to Haskins.
I don't think there is any need for further debate from any parties involved.
Far side from the entrance then, most of the travelers were pissed as farts by the time my nephew fought so their opinion isn't worth much. The haskins fans I spoke to stayed away from the main traveler group that was there to support Tyson and they thought haskins had blown it, I don't think the judges their would be so stupid as to give the fight to the outsider, no one wants to see a place smashed up before the main event.CharlesListon wrote:nick885 wrote:you must have been sat next to me then as I was ringside with me boys and all our group and the supporters in the area and the large group that I spoke to thought haskins lost and the whole arena went quiet waiting for the result which is not normal in all the events ive been to and there was no sign on my nephews face that he thought he lost, he thought he won because haskins spent most of the time punching his gloves and guard. Haskins is not a hard puncher.CharlesListon wrote:Ha!
My memory is very good. I was sat very closely to the ring and scored the fight myself widely to Haskins.
I don't think there is any need for further debate from any parties involved.
I was by all the traveller's and chris eubank. No one there thought Hall had won and more importantly none of the judges did.
Boxing News too Nick.mickey1975 wrote:Charles Liston and the judges weren't pissed and scored comfortably for Haskins, let it go, Nick...
CharlesListon wrote:Boxing News too Nick.mickey1975 wrote:Charles Liston and the judges weren't pissed and scored comfortably for Haskins, let it go, Nick...
You can never be truly objective when watching a close mate or family member.
At least it's rare to be so.
The previous contest will not matter when they meet again.
Channel 5 had it wide to Haskins as well.CharlesListon wrote:Boxing News too Nick.mickey1975 wrote:Charles Liston and the judges weren't pissed and scored comfortably for Haskins, let it go, Nick...
You can never be truly objective when watching a close mate or family member.
At least it's rare to be so.
The previous contest will not matter when they meet again.
Like sky had Stuart loosing his last fight.expe wrote:Channel 5 had it wide to Haskins as well.CharlesListon wrote:Boxing News too Nick.mickey1975 wrote:Charles Liston and the judges weren't pissed and scored comfortably for Haskins, let it go, Nick...
You can never be truly objective when watching a close mate or family member.
At least it's rare to be so.
The previous contest will not matter when they meet again.