Re: British & Irish boxing 52 fight history knowledge challenge
Posted: 01 Apr 2016, 16:49
davie wrote:I'm his jockey!
davie wrote:I'm his jockey!
crusader wrote:It seems to me like some of those who look down on others for a lack of historical knowledge will deride them when they try to make efforts to learn more.
Miserable pudenda those are.
Yeah, sure.Tuan_Jim wrote:I know exactly what you're trying to do with this thread. It's the work of a man so self-absorbed you haven't been able to watch historic fights that are referenced on a daily basis on a forum of which you have been a member for eleven years.
All your posts in all your time here have been made to draw attention from the subject to yourself. This thread is the closest you can get within forum rules to creating a thread that's actually centred around you. The title might as well be: 'Horse... On Horse.'
Who am I? Tell me!Sklar wrote:It still amazes me how few people have worked out who Horse is.
Is he ...Sklar wrote:It still amazes me how few people have worked out who Horse is.
The best damn poster we've got.Horse wrote:Who am I? Tell me!Sklar wrote:It still amazes me how few people have worked out who Horse is.
Hell yeah! Power to the FührerSklar wrote:The best damn poster we've got.Horse wrote:Who am I? Tell me!Sklar wrote:It still amazes me how few people have worked out who Horse is.
Well, I knew that.Sklar wrote:The best damn poster we've got.

Excuse me?davie wrote:I also have no problem with his monthly top 30 as a concept, where I do have issue is his stubborn refusal to budge in the face of sometimes uniform disagreement of the entire board with his decisions. Truth be told, I'd like someone else to run with it if it is to continue. But it's like a mainstay of the board, Boxrec B & I forum wouldn't be the same without the monthly top 30.
I thought you'd spit the dummy more at the suggestion that someone else might do itHorse wrote:Excuse me?davie wrote:I also have no problem with his monthly top 30 as a concept, where I do have issue is his stubborn refusal to budge in the face of sometimes uniform disagreement of the entire board with his decisions. Truth be told, I'd like someone else to run with it if it is to continue. But it's like a mainstay of the board, Boxrec B & I forum wouldn't be the same without the monthly top 30.
"If it is to continue"? What the hell is that supposed to mean?
It's all very insulting.davie wrote:I thought you'd spit the dummy more at the suggestion that someone else might do it
Horse wrote:Week 14: Randolph Turpin vs Sugar Ray Robinson I.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=199410
Horse wrote:Excuse me?davie wrote:I also have no problem with his monthly top 30 as a concept, where I do have issue is his stubborn refusal to budge in the face of sometimes uniform disagreement of the entire board with his decisions. Truth be told, I'd like someone else to run with it if it is to continue. But it's like a mainstay of the board, Boxrec B & I forum wouldn't be the same without the monthly top 30.
"If it is to continue"? What the hell is that supposed to mean?
I think I should be ranking fighters at the end of the month, based on their performance over the previous 31 days. I might start posting my top 30 at 11.59 on the last day of each calendar monthBoxerbeetle wrote:Horse wrote:Excuse me?davie wrote:I also have no problem with his monthly top 30 as a concept, where I do have issue is his stubborn refusal to budge in the face of sometimes uniform disagreement of the entire board with his decisions. Truth be told, I'd like someone else to run with it if it is to continue. But it's like a mainstay of the board, Boxrec B & I forum wouldn't be the same without the monthly top 30.
"If it is to continue"? What the hell is that supposed to mean?![]()
Davie, as far as I am aware, Horse's monthly top 30 is not officially endorsed by Boxrec or any of the alphabet organisations. We could all post our own rankings at 00:01 on the 1st of each month if we were so inclined.
Just don't put Murray too high ffs, it's bad enough having to repeat myself once a monthdavie wrote:I think I should be ranking fighters at the end of the month, based on their performance over the previous 31 days. I might start posting my top 30 at 11.59 on the last day of each calendar monthBoxerbeetle wrote:Horse wrote:Excuse me?
"If it is to continue"? What the hell is that supposed to mean?![]()
Davie, as far as I am aware, Horse's monthly top 30 is not officially endorsed by Boxrec or any of the alphabet organisations. We could all post our own rankings at 00:01 on the 1st of each month if we were so inclined.
He'll be on my p4p list over on the current sceneBoxerbeetle wrote:Just don't put Murray too high ffs, it's bad enough having to repeat myself once a monthdavie wrote:I think I should be ranking fighters at the end of the month, based on their performance over the previous 31 days. I might start posting my top 30 at 11.59 on the last day of each calendar monthBoxerbeetle wrote:
![]()
Davie, as far as I am aware, Horse's monthly top 30 is not officially endorsed by Boxrec or any of the alphabet organisations. We could all post our own rankings at 00:01 on the 1st of each month if we were so inclined.
davie wrote:Horse wrote:Week 14: Randolph Turpin vs Sugar Ray Robinson I.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=199410