BoxRec

Offal wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:

I now have irrefutable proof of my hypothesis



Yes

If you look carefully through will see that above each post the title of the topic will be quoted, in page 1 it was "next for David Haye" on page 5 it was "David Haye vs. ??? - May 21st 2016" and on page 13 it was "David Haye vs. Arnold Gjergjaj - May 21st 2016", so yea, he changed it a few times.

asdfjkl wrote:

Offal wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:

I now have irrefutable proof of my hypothesis



Yes

If you look carefully through will see that above each post the title of the topic will be quoted, in page 1 it was "next for David Haye" on page 5 it was "David Haye vs. ??? - May 21st 2016" and on page 13 it was "David Haye vs. Arnold Gjergjaj - May 21st 2016", so yea, he changed it a few times.

Wonder if we can keep this thread going for the remainder of Haye's career? Just get the OP to update the title every few weeks, we already have a basic template in place:

"Next for David Haye?"
"David Haye vs. ??? - XX XXX 20XX"
"David Haye vs. [insert terrible opponent] - XX XXX 20XX"

Would be great!

asdfjkl wrote:If you look carefully through will see that above each post the title of the topic will be quoted, in page 1 it was "next for David Haye" on page 5 it was "David Haye vs. ??? - May 21st 2016" and on page 13 it was "David Haye vs. Arnold Gjergjaj - May 21st 2016", so yea, he changed it a few times.

Boxerbeetle wrote:Wonder if we can keep this thread going for the remainder of Haye's career? Just get the OP to update the title every few weeks, we already have a basic template in place:

"Next for David Haye?"
"David Haye vs. ??? - XX XXX 20XX"
"David Haye vs. [insert terrible opponent] - XX XXX 20XX"

Would be great!

What a top notch idea, make it a Sticky as well ....

Offal wrote:

Can that be added to the smilies?

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Offal wrote:

Can that be added to the smilies?

If this thread is going to be kept going for the rest of Haye's career (as per your excellent suggestion) I think it's imperative that we have that head readily available.

PM Palooka, he'll sort it

Boxerbeetle wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

Offal wrote: I now have irrefutable proof of my hypothesis



Yes

If you look carefully through will see that above each post the title of the topic will be quoted, in page 1 it was "next for David Haye" on page 5 it was "David Haye vs. ??? - May 21st 2016" and on page 13 it was "David Haye vs. Arnold Gjergjaj - May 21st 2016", so yea, he changed it a few times.

Wonder if we can keep this thread going for the remainder of Haye's career? Just get the OP to update the title every few weeks, we already have a basic template in place:

"Next for David Haye?"
"David Haye vs. ??? - XX XXX 20XX"
"David Haye vs. [insert terrible opponent] - XX XXX 20XX"

Would be great!

i'll mull it over...

Offal wrote:At least Haye is up front with it, he's picked two opponents thus far selling them both on the basis of their unbeaten records.

It's preferable to a the cr^p we get from Peter Fury regarding Hughies opponents, 'a top 15/top 10/top 5 opponent will be announced next week etc etc, guess what they've pulled out despite us offering a career high purse, a substitute will be announced, and yes it's fat semi retired trialhorse, but he's never been stopped, look at our matching tracksuits and private jet'

like it !

I hope Thompson Briggs will become the undercard, then we will get an undercard with Briggs, who is ranked higher as Haye and Thompson, who is ranked higher as Gjergjaj.

rd350lc wrote:like it !

Ta ..

What's going on with this thread man?

davie wrote:What's going on with this thread man?

It's organic, it adapts quickly to changes in it's environment.

asdfjkl wrote:I hope Thompson Briggs will become the undercard, then we will get an undercard with Briggs, who is ranked higher as Haye and Thompson, who is ranked higher as Gjergjaj.

What % of your posts are about Briggs? What's the deal?

asdfjkl wrote:I hope Thompson Briggs will become the undercard, then we will get an undercard with Briggs, who is ranked higher as Haye and Thompson, who is ranked higher as Gjergjaj.

'When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think the sardines will be thrown into the sea'

Thompson vs Briggs, you seriously want to that ??

And when is someone going to punch that tw^t Kugan Cassius, it's long overdue, I detest the man?

Gjergjaj's record is a sea of nobodies. Only recognisable name is Denis Bakhtov who apparently had him down in the fight. David Haye has become a farce. Almost Audley-esque.

Stuarty30 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:I hope Thompson Briggs will become the undercard, then we will get an undercard with Briggs, who is ranked higher as Haye and Thompson, who is ranked higher as Gjergjaj.

'When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think the sardines will be thrown into the sea'

very profound , was that one of Eric Cantona's ?

rd350lc wrote:

Stuarty30 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:I hope Thompson Briggs will become the undercard, then we will get an undercard with Briggs, who is ranked higher as Haye and Thompson, who is ranked higher as Gjergjaj.

'When the seagulls follow the trawler, it's because they think the sardines will be thrown into the sea'

very profound , was that one of Eric Cantona's ?

Yes that was one of the modern day philosophers pearls of wisdom.

Stuarty30 wrote:Yes that was one of the modern day philosophers pearls of wisdom.

Yes .. here's another

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFsW6vvBwHk

makes me feel bloody old !

Offal wrote:Thompson vs Briggs, you seriously want to that ??

It's better as Haye Gjergjaj.

Sklar wrote:Cynical or not, Haye donating 10% to Nick Blackwell is good.

True, although he could have just quietly given Blackwell some money & fought a better opponent.

Syntax Error wrote:

Sklar wrote:Cynical or not, Haye donating 10% to Nick Blackwell is good.

True, although he could have just quietly given Blackwell some money & fought a better opponent.

True, but by announcing it publicly, it might push ticket sales up, increase the revenue and with that both his own and Nick Blackwell's take; he might not know he's ready for a better opponent.