Page 15 of 21
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:52
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:51
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:48
Meaning he just proved that he only cares because he's Polish, and basically just said so
would you care if some guy in Ulaan Bator, Mongolia got robbed, as much as if was your daughter?
next example, would you care if a team in Indonesia's 3rd division lost due to referee's wrong decisions as much as if it was your favourite team?
It's normal that fans care more about the fighters that they like and support.
It's not normal for anybody to care as much as this. Hell Glowacki himself is probably over it by now, but you just can't stop and move on with your life.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:55
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:52
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:51
would you care if some guy in Ulaan Bator, Mongolia got robbed, as much as if was your daughter?
next example, would you care if a team in Indonesia's 3rd division lost due to referee's wrong decisions as much as if it was your favourite team?
It's normal that fans care more about the fighters that they like and support.
It's not normal for anybody to care as much as this. Hell Glowacki himself is probably over it by now, but you just can't stop and move on with your life.
he's not, he said like 5 days ago that he thinks only about the rematch, he doesn't care about money etc he just wants the rematch.. he just go to take a rest on some sunny island for a week or two and then he'll be back in the gym hoping that he will get the rematch, doesn't matter where.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:56
by Onetimeonly
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:48
Meaning he just proved that he only cares because he's Polish, and basically just said so
Or he thinks you're Latvian.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:57
by dagilechia
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:56
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:48
Meaning he just proved that he only cares because he's Polish, and basically just said so
Or he thinks you're Latvian.
i have nothing against the Latvians
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 12:58
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:55
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:52
It's not normal for anybody to care as much as this. Hell Glowacki himself is probably over it by now, but you just can't stop and move on with your life.
he's not, he said like 5 days ago that he thinks only about the rematch, he doesn't care about money etc he just wants the rematch.. he just go to take a rest on some sunny island for a week or two and then he'll be back in the gym hoping that he will get the rematch, doesn't matter where.
I hope he does get the rematch too. Your meltdown when he loses again will be priceless.
For the record: I always liked Glowacki, and still like him, but your whining would just make it too funny to see him lose again to Breidis of all people so I'll be rooting for that in the rematch.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:00
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:58
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:55
he's not, he said like 5 days ago that he thinks only about the rematch, he doesn't care about money etc he just wants the rematch.. he just go to take a rest on some sunny island for a week or two and then he'll be back in the gym hoping that he will get the rematch, doesn't matter where.
I hope he does get the rematch too.
Your meltdown when he loses again will be priceless.
For the record: I always liked Glowacki, and still like him, but your whining would just make it too funny to see him lose again to Breidis of all people so I'll be rooting for that in the rematch.
hmm... what?
if he will lose fair and square i will have no problem with that
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:01
by gilgamesh
If you stopped whining now maybe I'd believe you won't whine later
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:01
by oogiebe
This rot is still going on?
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:03
by gilgamesh
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:01
This rot is still going on?
Yeah
Dag just can't get over it.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:04
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:03
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:01
This rot is still going on?
Yeah
Dag just can't get over it.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:05
by oogiebe
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:04
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:03
Yeah
Dag just can't get over it.
Dag - Have you written a letter to the sanctioning body?
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:06
by gilgamesh
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:05
Dag - Have you written a letter to the sanctioning body?
He's probably written ransom notes to Breidis
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:07
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:06
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:05
Dag - Have you written a letter to the sanctioning body?
He's probably written ransom notes to Breidis
Hahahahahaha
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:09
by dagilechia
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:05
Dag - Have you written a letter to the sanctioning body?
I didn't. Głowacki's promoter did. WBO says that they weren't sactioning this bout (but somehow they sent the belt (that wasn't present in Riga during the fight) to Briedis by post and awarded him the title) so they can only make recommendation to WBSS (???) and only Latvian federation can change the result. The Latvian federation says they weren't sanctioning the bout, the referees weren't theirs and Głowacki and Briedis both doesn't possess the Latvian licence.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:09
by Paci
Everything about how this was handeld is just plain stupid by everyone involved. Plain foul that the ref missed. Then it is a legit cause for revoke the end resualt, then again it is more a business decison end of the day.
Haven't read since page 2.
It is what it is. Stupid, silly and weird.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:10
by gilgamesh
Paci wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:09
Everything about how this was handeld is just plain stupid by everyone involved. Plain foul that the ref missed. Then it is a legit cause for revoke the end resualt, then again it is more a business decison end of the day.
Haven't read since page 2.
It is what it is. Stupid, silly and weird.
For the record: I wouldn't have minded if it were changed to a No Contest. That would seem a perfectly reasonable thing to do with all the f*ck ups from the referee.
What I'm making fun of here is the fact that Dag is still acting like Breidis put his dick in his cereal.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:11
by oogiebe
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:09
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:05
Dag - Have you written a letter to the sanctioning body?
I didn't. Głowacki's promoter did. WBO says that they weren't sactioning this bout (but somehow they sent the belt (that wasn't present in Riga during the fight) to Briedis by post and awarded him the title) so they can only make recommendation to WBSS (???) and only Latvian federation can change the result. The Latvian federation says they weren't sanctioning the bout, the referees weren't theirs and Głowacki and Briedis both doesn't possess the Latvian licence.
Well Glowacki gets the winner of title fight anyway, so let's move on.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:13
by Onetimeonly
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:57
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 12:56
Or he thinks you're Latvian.
i have nothing against the Latvians
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:15
by boxing_rocks
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:11
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:09
I didn't. Głowacki's promoter did. WBO says that they weren't sactioning this bout (but somehow they sent the belt (that wasn't present in Riga during the fight) to Briedis by post and awarded him the title) so they can only make recommendation to WBSS (???) and only Latvian federation can change the result. The Latvian federation says they weren't sanctioning the bout, the referees weren't theirs and Głowacki and Briedis both doesn't possess the Latvian licence.
Well Glowacki gets the winner of title fight anyway, so let's move on.
I strongly doubt it happens if Briedis doesn't want it. He can just drop the WBO belt.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:16
by gilgamesh
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:15
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:11
Well Glowacki gets the winner of title fight anyway, so let's move on.
I strongly doubt it happens if Briedis doesn't want it. He can just drop the WBO belt.
Why wouldn't he want it? He's already kicked the guys ass, and he will again. Unless he moved up to Heavyweight or something, which is possible.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:17
by Onetimeonly
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:15
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:11
Well Glowacki gets the winner of title fight anyway, so let's move on.
I strongly doubt it happens if Briedis doesn't want it. He can just drop the WBO belt.
If breidis wins he'll likely move up.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:19
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:16
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:15
I strongly doubt it happens if Briedis doesn't want it. He can just drop the WBO belt.
Why wouldn't he want it? He's already kicked the guys ass, and he will again. Unless he moved up to Heavyweight or something, which is possible.
because this time they will fight in boxing, not muay thai
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:19
by dagilechia
Briedis shouldn't even been in the semi-final, he lost to Gevor
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:19
by Paci
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:10
For the record: I wouldn't have minded if it were changed to a No Contest. That would seem a perfectly reasonable thing to do with all the f*ck ups from the referee.
What I'm making fun of here is the fact that Dag is still acting like Breidis put his dick in his cereal.
Indeed. Breidis came out as real douchebag that is for sure. A "No Contest" makes common sense, with the intentional foul that ended the fight.
All this makes me hope that he gets busted up in the final, if the decision isn't overturned.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 13:20
by gilgamesh
Paci wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:19
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 13:10
For the record: I wouldn't have minded if it were changed to a No Contest. That would seem a perfectly reasonable thing to do with all the f*ck ups from the referee.
What I'm making fun of here is the fact that Dag is still acting like Breidis put his dick in his cereal.
Indeed. Breidis came out as real douchebag that is for sure.
A "No Contest" makes common sense, with the intentional foul that ended the fight.
All this makes me hope that he gets busted up in the final, if the decision isn't overturned.
Do you think the elbow ended the fight? Because if so you might oughta watch it first.