Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Jake Paul | NETFLIX - 19 December 2025
Posted: 28 Nov 2025, 20:16
Paul looks like a midget.
Paul looks like a midget.
Obviously the fight will fall under USADA.
I thought it was common knowledge that JP has always been super juiced up, but as he was doing misfits stuff, there was no testingWales wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025, 16:22Obviously the fight will fall under USADA.
To be fair neither fighter have ever tested positive before.
I wouldn’t be too arsed anyway - ain’t no steroid on earth that takes you from Jake Paul’s size strength and performance level against Chavez Jnr to beating Anthony Joshua. And AJ certainly won’t be juiced .
What's the timescale between both photos ?
You can expect a fluffy white towel to be lobbed into the ring the second JP looks in trouble. They know their guy isn’t going to fight his way out of any rough spots for this one.
Promotional material in background of first photo is for Disney's BFG movie. It's from the Los Angeles premiere, which was held on June 21, 2016.
not being familiar with steroid use and weights etc, could JP achieve that muscle mass unaided in that timescale naturally ?
He could but he didn't. He put on most of that muscle in a much shorter amount of time. He has been living abroad (I believe Puerto Rico) where there is less testing and most of his fights have had no testing. He has facial acne, bacne, red and bloated face and terrible hairline. There's too many changes which are signs of steroid use for it to be unlikely, especially given his character.
He's gained a lot of muscle and found some decent power (at his level), he "has the best coaches" and "a great work ethic". All true, yes - but I think we all assumed your common knowledge - of course he's been juiced.Coco wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025, 16:25I thought it was common knowledge that JP has always been super juiced up, but as he was doing misfits stuff, there was no testingWales wrote: ↑29 Nov 2025, 16:22Obviously the fight will fall under USADA.
To be fair neither fighter have ever tested positive before.
I wouldn’t be too arsed anyway - ain’t no steroid on earth that takes you from Jake Paul’s size strength and performance level against Chavez Jnr to beating Anthony Joshua. And AJ certainly won’t be juiced .
But guard against a disqualification, JPs trainer jumping into stop it often counts as a disqualification.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 10:58 The bookies have Joshua at 1/4 for the stoppage. Easiest money you're every going to earn gentlemen. That's going to give you a 25% return on your money for a few minutes work.
Bet365 offers KO/TKO/DQ at 1/4Coco wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 12:17But guard against a disqualification, JPs trainer jumping into stop it often counts as a disqualification.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 10:58 The bookies have Joshua at 1/4 for the stoppage. Easiest money you're every going to earn gentlemen. That's going to give you a 25% return on your money for a few minutes work.
I'd cover the bet with a DQ
Fill your bootskeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 12:43Bet365 offers KO/TKO/DQ at 1/4Coco wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 12:17But guard against a disqualification, JPs trainer jumping into stop it often counts as a disqualification.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 10:58 The bookies have Joshua at 1/4 for the stoppage. Easiest money you're every going to earn gentlemen. That's going to give you a 25% return on your money for a few minutes work.
I'd cover the bet with a DQ
I think JP's an ego maniac, who thinks AJ is there for the taking. The second part of that could possibly be true, but it's certainly not from a novice cruiserweight with some highly questionable wins.Nightmare Roy wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 14:11Nah, gone from fighting a nine stoner in 14 oz gloves to an 18 stoner in 10 oz gloves. All just seems to fishy to me