Posted: 31 Aug 2005, 07:20
Whats the point of the Ashes if it's only just England Vs Australia?
I think it will many of these Aussies very last tests - really need to go to the drawboard, your really relying on Shane as an allrounder on this showing - and he will not be around forever either.thunderfromdownunder wrote:i think this could be the last test series for some of theses australia players....
I think we are headed the way the West Indies went in the early 80s all the older greats retired and they were left with a big gap in there side between the players leaving and the young guys replacing them.stujones wrote:I think it will many of these Aussies very last tests - really need to go to the drawboard, your really relying on Shane as an allrounder on this showing - and he will not be around forever either.thunderfromdownunder wrote:i think this could be the last test series for some of theses australia players....
Agree J, I still think with McGrath back and you blokes having doubt over Jones it isn't over by a long shot.J wrote:agreed reckon you take these to the bank as being droppedunless they do something remarkable in the last test
hayden
martyn
kasprowisz
gillespie
Guys who wont be dropped but maybe struggling for the next ashes series
Mcgrath
Langer
Mcgill
Warne (tho like mcgrath this will be his decision)
reckon they will look to build a team around the likes fo Lee, Clarke, Tait
but it will take a while.
Lets also not forget that we ae only winning by small margins, admittedly there is additonal pressure with the little urn only being won once in 20 years so thats not helping, but these guys before being pensioned off, are still fighting hard.
Thats true - look at the last 3 tests.J wrote:its never over with you feckers mate, ive suffered long enough to know this.fight to the bitter end should be the aussie motto.
Ok, but theirs not point in just two teams playing each other for it it needs more teams.J wrote:pleaese keep out this thread max.
u seem a nice chap and i dont want to have to be rude![]()
stick to boxing dude.
Jesus mate this isnt the world cup or anything, the Ashes go back to 1882 and are contested bi-annually between Australia and England.Max Molyneux wrote:Ok, but theirs not point in just two teams playing each other for it it needs more teams.J wrote:pleaese keep out this thread max.
u seem a nice chap and i dont want to have to be rude![]()
stick to boxing dude.
Ummm they were the first, thats pretty unique.bollox wrote:Ashes trivia - what was unique about the first Oz team to tour England?
No, like we did in the first TestJ wrote:what like you have done in the last 3 tests?
J wrote:I REFER TO MY EARLIER POST MAX.
u obviously dont know your silly mid on fomr youtr long leg.![]()
![]()
And i dont have the time or inclination to explain it.
haha ive read you posts since and they havent exaclty been spot on mate, so think ill put that down with the mcgrath 5-0 prediction and treat it with the contempt it deserves.bollox wrote:No, like we did in the first TestJ wrote:what like you have done in the last 3 tests?Mark my words fella, you ain't seen nuthin yet (actually, it'd be a bit ill fitting should we win and retain)
sure will do over a pint one day.Max Molyneux wrote:J wrote:I REFER TO MY EARLIER POST MAX.
u obviously dont know your silly mid on fomr youtr long leg.![]()
![]()
And i dont have the time or inclination to explain it.![]()
Explain it when you have time my friend.![]()
J wrote:haha ive read you posts since and they havent exaclty been spot on mate, so think ill put that down with the mcgrath 5-0 prediction and treat it with the contempt it deserves.bollox wrote:No, like we did in the first TestJ wrote:what like you have done in the last 3 tests?Mark my words fella, you ain't seen nuthin yet (actually, it'd be a bit ill fitting should we win and retain)
it makes me larf that you are getitng excited about maybe drawing the series though. Nuff said.