Page 17 of 25
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:56
by keithmoonhangover
Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:56
by Counter-puncher
Lulz. Woodhall just saying it was quigg himself not his trainer who realised he had to step on the gas
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:57
by ThereByTheGrace
What a result up yours Hearn Gallagher you twats!
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:57
by Taansend
smoothmoves wrote:117-11frampton
Mate, I had Frampton winning but not by 106 rounds

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:57
by Nightmare Roy
LancashireLoyal wrote:these pair of tvvats better fight rigo now
They won't
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:58
by Like a Boss
Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:58
by Nightmare Roy
ThereByTheGrace wrote:What a result up yours Hearn Gallagher you twats!

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:58
by reggaereggae
Another awful PPV fight...... Just dreadful...... No passion, little skill. And this is a unification fight?
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:58
by tigermoth87
fornicate knows why Quigg didn't start off strong. He threw it away by not doing anything for 6 rounds. Even if he started fighting just 2 rounds earlier he'd have pinched it.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:58
by Horse
keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
You are clueless.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:59
by Rexob
Like a Boss wrote:Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
Wouldn't bother for watching the first 9 rounds.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 19:59
by stevedoc
Like a Boss wrote:Glad to hear Frampton won. Look forward to seeing the replay.
I wouldn't bother,both were crap
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:00
by Loftgroov
Quigg looks so fresh.... just gutted he did naff all for the first half. So unnecessary.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:00
by uk_boxer
Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:00
by stevedoc
Horse wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.
You are clueless.
No he's not that's what I had
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:00
by Kilburn
Really wanted Quigg to win but no problem with the decision.
Frampton not quite as good as his reputation suggested.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:01
by Rexob
Yeah, Quigg give it away shame.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:01
by Boxerbeetle
Wonder who's booing Gallagher the loudest - the Irish or the Mancs?
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:01
by smoothmoves
Taansend wrote:smoothmoves wrote:117-11frampton
Mate, I had Frampton winning but not by 106 rounds

Oh dear! One too many whiskies perhaps!
117-113
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:02
by tigermoth87
uk_boxer wrote:Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
It's more Quigg lost than Frampton won.
Quigg did nothing at all for the first 6. Frampton did nothing either but did at least throw a few jabs and punches to nick the rounds. It's not like Frampton won them by outboxing Quigg, he won because Quigg didn't throw a punch.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:02
by Horse
Counter-puncher wrote:Lulz. Woodhall just saying it was quigg himself not his trainer who realised he had to step on the gas
Was Gallagher going to be happy just to see Quigg hear the final bell?
What was his plan exactly?
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:03
by Loftgroov
I think Ring Magazine might be phoning up and asking for their award back.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:03
by keithmoonhangover
Quigg threw about 3 punches in the first four rounds. Yes, you made him miss, but how the hell did were you level after 4. Don't be daft man.

Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:03
by crusader
tigermoth87 wrote:uk_boxer wrote:Frampton won without hitting his opponent?
It's more Quigg lost than Frampton won.
Quigg did nothing at all for the first 6. Frampton did nothing either but did at least throw a few jabs and punches to nick the rounds.
Yep....you just have to do more than your opponent to win a round, even if it's not a lot.
Re: Official Frampton - Quigg RBR/Discussion Thread
Posted: 27 Feb 2016, 20:03
by Horse
stevedoc wrote:No he's not that's what I had
Read his post.