Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by bripez »

Counter-puncher wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:06
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 08:48
Counter-puncher wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 08:43

for which their percentage should have been sufficient reward, without the laundry list of self-indulgent nest-lining that clearly went on.

fiddles like that aren't a well-earned reward for a good job, they're fiddles.
How much you reckon Frampton was getting paid before he left the Mcguigans?
entirely irrelevant.

as Frampton's promoter and manager he was entitled to whatever % of Frampton's purses he negotiated.

he was not entitled- under any circumstances- to treat Frampton as the McGuigan family tit, which is basically to an extent what he did (as well as his %)

but thanks for confirming your non-sequitur equivocations don't just come out over politics
You sound angry, and a little strange.

I am just giving my opinion - I don't have a desire to have an angry exchange with strange people I don't know on the Internet.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by bripez »

BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:00
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 08:48
Counter-puncher wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 08:43

for which their percentage should have been sufficient reward, without the laundry list of self-indulgent nest-lining that clearly went on.

fiddles like that aren't a well-earned reward for a good job, they're fiddles.
How much you reckon Frampton was getting paid before he left the Mcguigans?
That article claimed he got 7% of it.
I haven't read the article - is it saying that if Frampton was expecting a purse of £1m then he actually received £70k ?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Counter-puncher »

bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:16
Counter-puncher wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:06
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 08:48

How much you reckon Frampton was getting paid before he left the Mcguigans?
entirely irrelevant.

as Frampton's promoter and manager he was entitled to whatever % of Frampton's purses he negotiated.

he was not entitled- under any circumstances- to treat Frampton as the McGuigan family tit, which is basically to an extent what he did (as well as his %)

but thanks for confirming your non-sequitur equivocations don't just come out over politics
You sound angry, and a little strange.

I am just giving my opinion - I don't have a desire to have an angry exchange with strange people I don't know on the Internet.
How much you reckon Frampton was getting paid before he left the Mcguigans?

of course I forgot that in your world 'giving your opinion' means asking a question which is broadly insinuating but only meaningfully so in your own mind. good work, do keep it up
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Fray Bentos »

bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:16
You sound angry, and a little strange.
Pot. Kettle. Black
I don't have a desire to have an angry exchange with strange people I don't know on the Internet.
What? :lol:

It's your complete MO/persona on here.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by BigDoofus »

bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:18
BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:00
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 08:48

How much you reckon Frampton was getting paid before he left the Mcguigans?
That article claimed he got 7% of it.
I haven't read the article - is it saying that if Frampton was expecting a purse of £1m then he actually received £70k ?
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sund ... 04222.html
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3335
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Twinkle Toes »

They where robbing him under the pretence of expenses - Pretty low way to treat your fighter. Unless you want to give it a pass because Shane is supposedly a good trainer.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16387
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Nightmare Roy »

BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 10:13
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:18
BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:00

That article claimed he got 7% of it.
I haven't read the article - is it saying that if Frampton was expecting a purse of £1m then he actually received £70k ?
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sund ... 04222.html
That's terrible if it's true, like Witherspoon walking away with about 70k from I think it was a million pound purse agaisnt Bruno if I remember rightly
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by maverick23 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 11:37
BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 10:13
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:18

I haven't read the article - is it saying that if Frampton was expecting a purse of £1m then he actually received £70k ?
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sund ... 04222.html
That's terrible if it's true, like Witherspoon walking away with about 70k from I think it was a million pound purse agaisnt Bruno if I remember rightly
Could you copy and paste the key bits in the article please? It’s saying I have to pay to read.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Counter-puncher »

Twinkle Toes wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 10:52 They where robbing him under the pretence of expenses - Pretty low way to treat your fighter. Unless you want to give it a pass because Shane is supposedly a good trainer.
exactly, only a contrary twat would act like its ok because 'uh did a great job managing him'
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16387
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Nightmare Roy »

maverick23 wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 11:41
Nightmare Roy wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 11:37
That's terrible if it's true, like Witherspoon walking away with about 70k from I think it was a million pound purse agaisnt Bruno if I remember rightly
Could you copy and paste the key bits in the article please? It’s saying I have to pay to read.
Same for me mate, can only.see the bit about getting 7%.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by maverick23 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 11:53
maverick23 wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 11:41
Nightmare Roy wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 11:37

That's terrible if it's true, like Witherspoon walking away with about 70k from I think it was a million pound purse agaisnt Bruno if I remember rightly
Could you copy and paste the key bits in the article please? It’s saying I have to pay to read.
Same for me mate, can only.see the bit about getting 7%.
Got it 👍
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3302
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

It’s bad enough when fighters are taken advantage of by your typical shady, would sell his granny for a fiver type promoter but when it’s done by a guy like Barry who is as aware as anyone of the sacrifices fighters make then it’s particularly egregious.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9630
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by SeanBrennan »

BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 10:13
bripez wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:18
BigDoofus wrote: 02 Oct 2023, 09:00

That article claimed he got 7% of it.
I haven't read the article - is it saying that if Frampton was expecting a purse of £1m then he actually received £70k ?
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sund ... 04222.html
it's behind a paywall mate can you summarise please (if you can be bothered - no problem if not)
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8565
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by coneye »

70,000 out of a million , Jeez not suprised there was a fall out , even more suprised Barry and Shane have got ANYONE to sign with them . I know if i was with them i would be double checking EVERY single invoice , and expense .
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by maverick23 »

coneye wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 01:21 70,000 out of a million , Jeez not suprised there was a fall out , even more suprised Barry and Shane have got ANYONE to sign with them . I know if i was with them i would be double checking EVERY single invoice , and expense .
I get the impression Shane wasn’t particularly involved with the scamming of Frampton. It seems to be his dad and brothers.

Unfortunately sometimes it’s hard for people to see the bad in others - particularly family.

We saw the same with the Hattons as Ray was clearly ripping off Ricky yet Carol couldn’t see through the bullshit.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Coco »

Shane has a gym in London and living there too, that's a lot of money, he has clearly benefitted from the financial arrangements.

There is no weekly wage in boxing
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by maverick23 »

Coco wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 06:41 Shane has a gym in London and living there too, that's a lot of money, he has clearly benefitted from the financial arrangements.

There is no weekly wage in boxing
He should have got his agreed % as a trainer and no more.

Shane has been involved with lots of top boxers who would have earned big money so I wouldn’t begrudge him living in London.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10147
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by samwbr »

Shane's gym is in Canterbury now isn't it?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Coco »

samwbr wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 08:08 Shane's gym is in Canterbury now isn't it?
Dunno, but if so it's all expensive in that neck of the woods.

Tesco Joe is still borrowing backrooms to train in.

Not many trainers make any money.

For me Tesco has had more championship fighters than McGuigan, but then he never had a deal like the McGuigans had with Frampton
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by maverick23 »

Coco wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 08:17
samwbr wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 08:08 Shane's gym is in Canterbury now isn't it?
Dunno, but if so it's all expensive in that neck of the woods.

Tesco Joe is still borrowing backrooms to train in.

Not many trainers make any money.

For me Tesco has had more championship fighters than McGuigan, but then he never had a deal like the McGuigans had with Frampton
Joe’s had plenty of fighters in big fights so he should have made a good living and be set for life.

He’s also trained, managed and promoted fighters but I doubt he ripped them off unlike Barry McGuigan and his family.

I think it shows to me partly why they have the Muhammed Ali act in the US whereby fighters can’t be managed and promoted by the same person. A manager should be earning his money through getting the best deals possible and maximising the income of his fighter. It’s impossible to do that impartially when you’re also the promoter and, in Frampton’s, the same family as the trainer.

We’ve seen it can be difficult in the past when FWarren folded his company to avoid paying Ricky Burns who he co-managed and promoted. It’s a real conflict of interest.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16387
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by Nightmare Roy »

coneye wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 01:21 70,000 out of a million , Jeez not suprised there was a fall out , even more suprised Barry and Shane have got ANYONE to sign with them . I know if i was with them i would be double checking EVERY single invoice , and expense .
No that was Tim Witherspoon with Don King cant remember the exact figures but I'm pretty sure he won the court case and got money back
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13360
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by jameswilson »



Brief mention of some of the stuff in here.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by polecateddy »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 08:41
coneye wrote: 03 Oct 2023, 01:21 70,000 out of a million , Jeez not suprised there was a fall out , even more suprised Barry and Shane have got ANYONE to sign with them . I know if i was with them i would be double checking EVERY single invoice , and expense .
No that was Tim Witherspoon with Don King cant remember the exact figures but I'm pretty sure he won the court case and got money back
Wasn’t it a million dollars but only after he’d lost motivation and been stopped in a round by Bonecrusher Smith? Not sure the motivation ever really returned.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39202
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by margaret thatcher »

big f@ckin deal if frampton checked billam smith's wraps, the idea that it was some grand despicable act is :lol:
The Gratest
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6495
Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41

Re: Cyclone / Frampton Court Case

Post by The Gratest »

A sunbed tanning session...women's lingerie...high heeled shoes...anyone got any pics of what this Mcguigan son looks like? :confused: (Asking for a friend...Homihenry)
Post Reply