skanksta wrote: ↑10 Nov 2018, 19:53
That's not really true.
Not a lot happened, the underdogs were a bit better than expected and nicked rounds.
Fighters as good as that aren't bothered to lose a few early rounds and often do.
Part of it is the narrativising (I'm pissed, sorry) that goes on in professional sports entertainment: "This mush is an unbeatable monster blah blah blah" rather than like an accurate portrayal of the idiosyncrasies of the gifted mush in question & so when ssaid mush lets the other guy into the fight or starts slow (even if that's what he does/is a standard part of his gaemplan/is a considered thing to draw the other bloke's sting etc etc) the blowhard then has to go "STOP THE PRESSES! THE UNDERDOG IS ON TOP!!! COULD WE BE WITNESSINGA A PASSING OF THE TORCH?!?"
& I throw up a little in my mouth & die inside a little more.
All that hoopla gets in your head is what I think I'm trying to say, then you just end up going with it & you start believing in the like invested version of events the sports blowhard is presenting rather than watching it & thinking it through like you would if you were relying on your own judgement.
God, I'm drunk.