BoxRec

craigjenkins05 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:27 https://wbcboxing.com/en/status-of-dillian-whyte/

Can't seem to reach that site. Could be my anti-virus program. Maybe it's anti doping too!

oogiebe wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:32

craigjenkins05 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:27 https://wbcboxing.com/en/status-of-dillian-whyte/

Can't seem to reach that site. Could be my anti-virus program. Maybe it's anti doping too!

Doesn't work for me either.

https://www.BS.com/wbc-suspend ... ry--141319

Replace "BS" with boxing scene without the space.

They’ve just said on Sky Sports News on TV that Whyte has been suspended.

Controversial wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:38 They’ve just said on Sky Sports News on TV that Whyte has been suspended.

They finally reported on the situation! LOL!

Controversial wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:38 They’ve just said on Sky Sports News on TV that Whyte has been suspended.

They only suspended the interim championship and his mandatory status until a hearing.
Personally I think he gets a 1 year ban from WBC. But who knows

Pov, ortiz, and stiv all pretty much got a slap on the wrist when they failed ahead of there WBC fights

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:55 Pov, ortiz, and stiv all pretty much got a slap on the wrist when they failed ahead of there WBC fights

Nery got nothing....

Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 09:32 Have Sky Sports News still not even mentioned the story yet? Absolute fvcking sh!thouses if not.

I seen it on Sky Sports News at least a day after the story broke

Edit: all they mentioned was Whyte’s press release

Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 18:23

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 16:55 Pov, ortiz, and stiv all pretty much got a slap on the wrist when they failed ahead of there WBC fights

Nery got nothing....

Apart drop a lifetime ban from Japan lol. Like he’s ever gonna fight their again.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 19:33

Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 18:23

Nery got nothing....

Apart drop a lifetime ban from Japan lol. Like he’s ever gonna fight their again.

Got that for failing to make weight, not that actual drug test fail :(

Apparently, VADA was testing Dill as well. The final VADA sample was pulled on the 15th, two days before UKAD. That sample on the 15th showed no trace of anything illegal. That would mean that Dill took D-Bol after the 15th test time and before the 17th sample was pulled.

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/ ... erim-champ

Wbc and heavyweight boxing is all a farce anyway,its like they gave deontay wilder the green belt and said you pick who you wanna fight,we will have rankings but we have enough belts to keep them happy but your our real champ so go and enjoy yourself . I used to love the wbc belt and what it stood for but now its as bad as the wba.

oogiebe wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 20:45 Apparently, VADA was testing Dill as well. The final VADA sample was pulled on the 15th, two days before UKAD. That sample on the 15th showed no trace of anything illegal. That would mean that Dill took D-Bol after the 15th test time and before the 17th sample was pulled.

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/ ... erim-champ

That still wouldn’t make sense as he could still be tested right up to and including fight night all likelihood so taking that would show straight away unless he took something to mask it - they would know that and VADA testing costs £40k and they check 5-10 times with no notice so it would be very difficult if Whyte insisted on it to try use something himself.

JimStone wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 01:16 Why are people still talking about the B Sample? Is it not the case that opting for the hearing was Dillian's opportunity to explain why the particular metabolites were present? Therefore no need for the B Sample to be tested?

As I understand it the testing agencies only test the B Sample if the sports person requests it.

Roy Jones Jr V Richard Hall anyone?

Both failed their A samples following their fight but were cleared by B samples coming back negative.

Autobarn wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 14:09

JimStone wrote: ↑30 Jul 2019, 01:16 Why are people still talking about the B Sample? Is it not the case that opting for the hearing was Dillian's opportunity to explain why the particular metabolites were present? Therefore no need for the B Sample to be tested?

As I understand it the testing agencies only test the B Sample if the sports person requests it.

Roy Jones Jr V Richard Hall anyone?

Both failed their A samples following their fight but were cleared by B samples coming back negative.

I think you are missing the point. The B Sample is only tested if the donor requests it. Is it not the case that Dillian opted for the short notice hearing in lieu of the B Sample being tested? Perhaps taking the decision to explain why the metabolites were there rather than disputing the findings?

That's how I interpreted what Hearn said in the IFL interview with the Scottish chap.

Hearn was on Talk Sport saying that he doesn't believe Whyte cheated but if he is guilty he should be banned. He went on to say that Whyte is paranoid about being contaminated so he wears gloves to his press conferences to stop any contamination, I just checked out the pre-fight presser with Rivas and Whyte was indeed wearing gloves.

Controversial wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 14:56 Hearn was on Talk Sport saying that he doesn't believe Whyte cheated but if he is guilty he should be banned. He went on to say that Whyte is paranoid about being contaminated and wears gloves to his press conferences to stop any contamination, I just checked out the pre-fight presser with Rivas and Whyte was indeed wearing gloves.

I always thought the gloves were part of Dill's 'thug' aura.

Contamination paranoia seems ridiculous to me. Who would benefit?

Controversial wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 14:56 Hearn was on Talk Sport saying that he doesn't believe Whyte cheated but if he is guilty he should be banned. He went on to say that Whyte is paranoid about being contaminated so he wears gloves to his press conferences to stop any contamination, I just checked out the pre-fight presser with Rivas and Whyte was indeed wearing gloves.

ha ha, if that's not the proof of his innocence I don't know what is...

JimStone wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 15:06 Contamination paranoia seems ridiculous to me. Who would benefit?

I remember David Haye took his own bottled water and food when he fought Valuev as he was worried about being spiked.

greg wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 15:06

Controversial wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 14:56 Hearn was on Talk Sport saying that he doesn't believe Whyte cheated but if he is guilty he should be banned. He went on to say that Whyte is paranoid about being contaminated so he wears gloves to his press conferences to stop any contamination, I just checked out the pre-fight presser with Rivas and Whyte was indeed wearing gloves.

ha ha, if that's not the proof of his innocence I don't know what is...

Ha I know, I think the point Hearn was trying to make is Whyte wanted to get tested and pushed for Rivas to get tested too and the reason Hearn thinks he's innocent is because he is supposedly so paranoid these days.

JimStone wrote: ↑31 Jul 2019, 15:06 Contamination paranoia seems ridiculous to me. Who would benefit?

A rival fighter or promoter could potentially benefit from Whyte receiving a lengthy ban.

One less main event fighter on Matchroom books would serve Warren well for example.

Also, I'm sure that Haymon could find a guy to fill an open mandatory slot that Whyte may loose.

I'm not saying it isn't a bit mental, just that there is a certain degree of logic to it.

If Hayman was going to contaminate someone, I think AJ would be ahead in the queue