Posted: 05 Sep 2005, 07:44
Are "Lou and Andy" making an appearance there?
Everyone's a wit nowadaysJ wrote:nice analogy.
but not one you were advocating til recently![]()
its all friendly banter mate, getitng in practice for thuirs, oh and fri ogh and sunday and Monday if i goes that far.
I shall be there when england retain the ashes.
With that and being at hatton been a good year for thumping aussies.![]()
Could have sworn I read a whilr ago that we'd won :( Proof that one could not give a flying shag in hell about women's alleged cricketKevin wrote:Post away
England triumph in Women's Ashes
Second women' s Test, Worcester, day four (lunch): England 289 & 75-4 beat Australia 131 & 232 by six wickets
England win series 1-0
COME ON FREDDIE!!!!!
I think I heard ages ago that the team was comprised entirely of Aboriginies. Am I even close?bollox wrote:Ashes trivia - what was unique about the first Oz team to tour England?
hahaha you funny git.bollox wrote:Could have sworn I read a whilr ago that we'd won :( Proof that one could not give a flying shag in hell about women's alleged cricketKevin wrote:Post away
England triumph in Women's Ashes
Second women' s Test, Worcester, day four (lunch): England 289 & 75-4 beat Australia 131 & 232 by six wickets
England win series 1-0
COME ON FREDDIE!!!!!
Spot on there Mr Woe - the team was comprised of Aborigineswoe31 wrote:I think I heard ages ago that the team was comprised entirely of Aboriginies. Am I even close?bollox wrote:Ashes trivia - what was unique about the first Oz team to tour England?
Can't wait until Thursday. McGrath will back and hopefully firing, Simon Jones will hopefully not be risked, and Stuart MacGill will hopefully be struck down by food poisoning so he is unfit to play under any circumstances.
They have been reporting here that McGrath is a definently playing. I would imagine that even at 60% he would be a better choice than either Gillespie Kasprowich or Tate.J wrote:ui hope mcgrath plays would love to see him there.
at the end of the day its a privilige to see the likes of him and warne bowl.
as a cricket fan.
also a fitting finale if both teams are at their best.
Not sure about that, I was very impressed with Tait in the last test. Looked like a future star to me!Ben Keilty wrote:They have been reporting here that McGrath is a definently playing. I would imagine that even at 60% he would be a better choice than either Gillespie Kasprowich or Tate.J wrote:ui hope mcgrath plays would love to see him there.
at the end of the day its a privilige to see the likes of him and warne bowl.
as a cricket fan.
also a fitting finale if both teams are at their best.
It's a shame for the team, and a shame for Jones aswell. It'd have been nice to go a whole series with the same team for each test.J wrote:JONES RULED OUT OF TEST.
mind you looking at the weather forecast its gonna be a draw.
shame.
Friday heavy showers sat heavy showers. Gonna lose a days play there.
Yep.... and that'll do nicely 8)J wrote:yip if the weather were to be fine id go with anderson but the way it islooking id play collingwood.
draw.
precisley what a load of tosh.nickd wrote:My Aussie mate was whining about the weather the other day saying it would be a tainted win if the last test was ruined by the weather and Australia didn't get the chance to level the series. I pointed out that but for the weather we'd be 3-1 up already which soon shut him up!!
If Kasprowicz had have been rightly given not out at the end of the second test and we'd managed to score 3 more runs, Australia would be 2-1 up and the Ashes already decided. What could have happened means nothing... as it stands you're 2-1 in front and it would be a shame to see such a good series ruined by a couple of days of poor weather.nickd wrote:My Aussie mate was whining about the weather the other day saying it would be a tainted win if the last test was ruined by the weather and Australia didn't get the chance to level the series. I pointed out that but for the weather we'd be 3-1 up already which soon shut him up!!
Make that 2-2 as we would have easily won but for the rain losing a days play. My point was you cant moan about the weather when you've benefited from it yourself already.woe31 wrote:If Kasprowicz had have been rightly given not out at the end of the second test and we'd managed to score 3 more runs, Australia would be 2-1 up and the Ashes already decided. What could have happened means nothing... as it stands you're 2-1 in front and it would be a shame to see such a good series ruined by a couple of days of poor weather.nickd wrote:My Aussie mate was whining about the weather the other day saying it would be a tainted win if the last test was ruined by the weather and Australia didn't get the chance to level the series. I pointed out that but for the weather we'd be 3-1 up already which soon shut him up!!
oh do one will you.woe31 wrote:If Kasprowicz had have been rightly given not out at the end of the second test and we'd managed to score 3 more runs, Australia would be 2-1 up and the Ashes already decided. What could have happened means nothing... as it stands you're 2-1 in front and it would be a shame to see such a good series ruined by a couple of days of poor weather.nickd wrote:My Aussie mate was whining about the weather the other day saying it would be a tainted win if the last test was ruined by the weather and Australia didn't get the chance to level the series. I pointed out that but for the weather we'd be 3-1 up already which soon shut him up!!