Page 18 of 26
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:25
by BobD'Mello
I originally fancied Enzo, but he looks a bit gun shy in there, and Frenkel looks a more complete boxer currently.
Mac seems to want to just line up the big shot rather than breaking Frenkel down.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:26
by Asterix
Jeff Thomas wrote:Brill fight- great call Asterix
Thanks Jeff. Great card so far. Nice, competitive match-ups.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:27
by Baboon
Frenkel always ducks to the right and turns when he's on the ropes, hopefully Enzo can land a left hook or two when he does that.
29-28 Macc
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:28
by crusader
29-28 Enzo
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:31
by Kilburn
Surely Frenkel hasn't counter-punched his way to 17 ko's.
I think Enzo can take this as long as he keeps coming forward.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:32
by crusader
39-37 Enzo
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:32
by lefty
Frenkel seems to not like getting hit back!Not that anyone actually does but you know what I mean!
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:33
by Kilburn
Piper says 6-7 round stoppage for Enzo.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:33
by Baboon
39-37 Macc
Not particularly impressed by Frenkel, plenty of technical flaws.....there again Enzo has mastered the art of leaving his chin up in the air.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:33
by TempleSlave
Enzo is a bully but doesn't throw enough.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:34
by Asterix
Kilburn wrote:Surely Frenkel hasn't counter-punched his way to 17 ko's.
I think Enzo can take this as long as he keeps coming forward.
Frenkel has had easy fights.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:35
by Kilburn
I reckon Enzo has the speed on this guy when they open up respectively.
Frenkel not looking as dangerous in round 5 as he was in the first.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:36
by Baboon
lefty wrote:This ref has got an eye like columbo!
thanks for that lefty, can't stop looking at it now...
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:36
by bfchunk
I thought this fight would be over by now. Go Enzo!
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:36
by crusader
49-46 Mac
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:37
by lefty
I wonder if sauerland is starting to regret making these fights!Lol
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:38
by Baboon
Macc cut in headclash.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:38
by sendo
Frenkel looked pretty fast and sharp in round 1, clearly not used to getting hit and pushed back though.
Enzo cut now.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:38
by bfchunk
lefty wrote:I wonder if sauerland is starting to regret making these fights!Lol
Very much unlike them. No home advantage, no Tillemann....
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:39
by leforge
Can jim watt retire!
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:40
by Kilburn
Frenkel isn't a worker. He could have responded in the sixth but didn't.
Enzo can pull away in the second half.
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:40
by Baboon
59-55 Macc
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:40
by crusader
59-55 Mac
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:40
by lefty
Im definietly fancying enzo at the minute,Frenkels looking abit like he's bitten off more than he can handle!
Re: Magnificent Seven PBP/Discussion
Posted: 18 Sep 2010, 17:42
by Asterix
lefty wrote:I wonder if sauerland is starting to regret making these fights!Lol
These guys aren't the most important to Sauerland. He's throwing them in at the deep end to see if they will sink or swim, I think.