Page 18 of 21
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:11
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
Paci wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:06
Yeah, you are pissed. Let it go, or let it root real bad.
Take a break.
no. what i mean is that if someone thinks that an internet discussion could cause any emotions or influence my mood in any way it must be someone not older than 9 or 10 years old
It's CLEARLY influencing your mood. You can't stop talking about it. The fact that it's influencing your mood couldn't be more obvious if you had a goddamn flashing neon sign over your head that said "I'm upset my boy lost"
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:12
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:06
i was back to this topic ONLY when something new was revealed (WBO's statement, Briedis video etc). what's so weird? isn't this forum supposed to do that?
Nothing new was revealed. Glowacki lost, and you're upset about it. Been that way since Page 1. Get the f*ck over it.
you, boxing rocks and saad combined have made more posts than i did, i was mostly responding to yours posts, you were to mine. that is what was going in this topic. since the page 11 or so you got too emotional and we got what we got.
WBO's statement on the protest was something interesting to some posters on this BOXING forum. i don't know why i shouldn't be back to this topic when this occured? should i open new one?
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:13
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:12
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
Nothing new was revealed. Glowacki lost, and you're upset about it. Been that way since Page 1. Get the f*ck over it.
you, boxing rocks and saad combined have made more posts than i did, i was mostly responding to yours posts, you were to mine. that is what was going in this topic. since the page 11 or so you got too emotional and we got what we got.
WBO's statement on the protest was something interesting to some posters on this BOXING forum. i don't know why i shouldn't be back to this topic when this occured? should i open new one?
Sure. I'll make fun of you there too.
Your boy lost. Get over it.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:13
by oogiebe
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:10
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
Ahhh...another thread reduced to rubble. (rubbish?)
This thread started out that way. It's a comedy thread. Have a laugh, and a smile
Meh, a few posts on the fight would've been fine. But this has gone over the top! I unsubscribed a while ago, but tuned back in for the comedy. It's remarkable.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:14
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:11
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
no. what i mean is that if someone thinks that an internet discussion could cause any emotions or influence my mood in any way it must be someone not older than 9 or 10 years old
It's CLEARLY influencing your mood. You can't stop talking about it. The fact that it's influencing your mood couldn't be more obvious if you had a goddamn flashing neon sign over your head that said "I'm upset my boy lost"
it's not, but it clearly influenced yours. you got so furious and emotional. calm down, don't be like a teenager girl during period.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:14
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:13
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:12
you, boxing rocks and saad combined have made more posts than i did, i was mostly responding to yours posts, you were to mine. that is what was going in this topic. since the page 11 or so you got too emotional and we got what we got.
WBO's statement on the protest was something interesting to some posters on this BOXING forum. i don't know why i shouldn't be back to this topic when this occured? should i open new one?
Sure. I'll make fun of you there too.
Your boy lost. Get over it.
he did - in something what we can't call a legit boxing match
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:15
by gilgamesh
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:13
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:10
This thread started out that way. It's a comedy thread. Have a laugh, and a smile
Meh, a few posts on the fight would've been fine. But this has gone over the top! I unsubscribed a while ago, but tuned back in for the comedy. It's remarkable.
The comedy is all I'm here for at this point

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:16
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:14
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:11
It's CLEARLY influencing your mood. You can't stop talking about it. The fact that it's influencing your mood couldn't be more obvious if you had a goddamn flashing neon sign over your head that said "I'm upset my boy lost"
it's not, but it clearly influenced yours. you got so furious and emotional. calm down, don't be like a teenager girl during period.
^I know you are, but what am I
This is the level of mind we're working with here folks

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:17
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:14
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:13
Sure. I'll make fun of you there too.
Your boy lost. Get over it.
he did - in something what we can't call a legit boxing match
Boxrec has it listed as a Boxing match. They have it listed as a Glowacki loss too.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:17
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:15
oogiebe wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:13
Meh, a few posts on the fight would've been fine. But this has gone over the top! I unsubscribed a while ago, but tuned back in for the comedy. It's remarkable.
The comedy is all I'm here for at this point
nah. you almost started to cry when you realised that i am STILL talking about THIS (i do not mention what incident and fight was that just to not to make you angry and crying again) admit it

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:18
by gilgamesh
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:18
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:17
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:14
he did - in something what we can't call a legit boxing match
Boxrec has it listed as a Boxing match. They have it listed as a Glowacki loss too.
also, Boxrec tells that Helenius defeated Chisora in a Boxing contest which is obviously wrong. your argument makes no sense.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:18
by Onetimeonly
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
Paci wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:06
Yeah, you are pissed. Let it go, or let it root real bad.
Take a break.
no. what i mean is that if someone thinks that an internet discussion could cause any emotions or influence my mood in any way it must be someone not older than 9 or 10 years old
Anyone that can't see you're emotional would have to be an infant.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:19
by dagilechia
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:18
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:09
no. what i mean is that if someone thinks that an internet discussion could cause any emotions or influence my mood in any way it must be someone not older than 9 or 10 years old
Anyone that can't see you're emotional would have to be an infant.

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:19
by gilgamesh
You guys think Dag will still be this upset come next year?

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:20
by jamamb
i mean why do ppl even keep engaging then, threads go this long because of multiple sides not shutting up
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:21
by dagilechia
when i was watching the fight live, i was emotional, sure, the outcome made me emotional, sure. the discussion on here, whether it's just arguing who's right and who's not or simply insulting each other doesn't make me emotional in any way.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:22
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:18
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:17
Boxrec has it listed as a Boxing match. They have it listed as a Glowacki loss too.
also, Boxrec tells that Helenius defeated Chisora in a Boxing contest which is obviously wrong. your argument makes no sense.
Boxrec records Official results. Officially Helenius is credited with a win over Chisora. Fans believe Chisora won, and Chisora himself believes he won. He got a major title fight immediately after that due to the outrage from pissed off fans.
I don't disagree with you that the fight should be a no contest, but it's not.
I believe Golovkin won both fights against Canelo, and should've received those decisions, but he won't.
If fights, and results I disagree with are brought up sure I'll mention how I felt about it. I'm not gonna dedicate every waking moment of my life to demanding the result be overturned though.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:23
by gilgamesh
jamamb wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:20
i mean why do ppl even keep engaging then, threads go this long because of multiple sides not shutting up
I'm engaging because it's funny, and the most entertaining thread on the forum at the moment for me. I can't speak for everybody else.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:23
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:21
when i was watching the fight live, i was emotional, sure,
the outcome made me emotional, sure. the discussion on here, whether it's just arguing who's right and who's not or simply insulting each other doesn't make me emotional in any way.
Thanks Captain Obvious
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:25
by boxing_rocks
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:19
You guys think Dag will still be this upset come next year?
After Briedis drops the WBO belt and they present/sell it to Glowaki, he will cool down.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:26
by dagilechia
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:22
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:18
also, Boxrec tells that Helenius defeated Chisora in a Boxing contest which is obviously wrong. your argument makes no sense.
Boxrec records Official results. Officially Helenius is credited with a win over Chisora. Fans believe Chisora won, and Chisora himself believes he won. He got a major title fight immediately after that due to the outrage from pissed off fans.
I don't disagree with you that the fight should be a no contest, but it's not.
I believe Golovkin won both fights against Canelo, and should've received those decisions, but he won't.
If fights, and results I disagree with are brought up sure I'll mention how I felt about it.
I'm not gonna dedicate every waking moment of my life to demanding the result be overturned though.
do i? you are simply wrong. i was back to the topic when WBO revealed their opinion on the protest and when Briedis posted his video, that's it.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:26
by greg
@Dag
...I tend to believe it's perfectly clear who thinks what, if there's any consolation to you there's this poll above, results can't be any clearer than that--it's sort of mission accomplished imo...
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:26
by dagilechia
boxing_rocks wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:25
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:19
You guys think Dag will still be this upset come next year?
After Briedis drops the WBO belt and they present/sell it to Glowaki, he will cool down.

Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:26
by gilgamesh
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:26
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:22
Boxrec records Official results. Officially Helenius is credited with a win over Chisora. Fans believe Chisora won, and Chisora himself believes he won. He got a major title fight immediately after that due to the outrage from pissed off fans.
I don't disagree with you that the fight should be a no contest, but it's not.
I believe Golovkin won both fights against Canelo, and should've received those decisions, but he won't.
If fights, and results I disagree with are brought up sure I'll mention how I felt about it.
I'm not gonna dedicate every waking moment of my life to demanding the result be overturned though.
do i? you are simply wrong. i was back to the topic when WBO revealed their opinion on the protest and when Briedis posted his video, that's it.
And yet here you still are.