Page 19 of 28
Re: john fury
Posted: 23 Jun 2017, 17:12
by chinarich
Boxerbeetle wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
This is a superb argument.

I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec

Henry has missed out if he isn't building a career as a defence lawyer...
Re: john fury
Posted: 23 Jun 2017, 20:44
by watsupdoc87
Boxerbeetle wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
This is a superb argument.

I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Couldn't of said it better. 2nd chances everyone

Re: john fury
Posted: 23 Jun 2017, 21:30
by mickey1975
Coco wrote:Coco wrote:
Wounded Knee? They all just moved on to the adjoining site
I was referring to Wounded Knee 1971, where the government (for seventy plus days) had a ground war with the Native American.
Whichever one you are talking about I think the link is tenuous even if I was being very kind.
But then you did say on another forum that you feel Trump is appealing to the minorities!
Just reading back, because it's my favourite thread, Henry called the US election!
Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 04:49
by HomicideHenry
mickey1975 wrote:
Just reading back, because it's my favourite thread, Henry called the US election!
I did indeed, same with Fury-Klitschko
Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 07:02
by banjo
Boxerbeetle wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
This is a superb argument.

I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.
Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 19:03
by Roche 5
mickey1975 wrote:Partridge has been very quiet recently.
I stand by every word of it.

Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 19:10
by Roche 5
Teddy's Toupee wrote:I'm not sure it is PIGG. His/her newly minted pseudonyms usually appear to have only been boxrec members for a few days or even hours. Unless this is a sleeper pseudonym.
It wasn't (on this occasion)

Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 19:11
by Roche 5
magnus wrote:There's been a Peter Barlow posting on Checkhook for ages, with the same viewpoints as this guy. Don't think it's the Notorious PIGG.
It isn't/wasn't (nice to know I am considered 'notorious', that's a good thing ... right?)

Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 19:11
by Roche 5
Boxerbeetle wrote:Damnit, if it is Pigg then he completely fooled me. Fair play

Afraid not

Re: john fury
Posted: 26 Jun 2017, 19:13
by Roche 5
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
After I rumbled him on the other thread it's obvious!
Step it up Pigg!
I've 'stepped it up' on many occasions (dozens of accounts you've never rumbled) bit this sorry effort is not me:

Re: john fury
Posted: 23 Aug 2017, 06:32
by Counter-puncher
I just thought I would bump this thread for gigles. I hope it finds a new audience. everyone should rad it.
Re: john fury
Posted: 23 Aug 2017, 07:40
by Cyclops
Re-reading this after all this time this certainly sounds like the ramblings of a mad man. Perhaps coming back isn't the best thing for him. He should throw his phone and away and go and live in the woods somewhere. He would have been alright in another era, would Tyson. Like 100 years ago. I'm glad he's retired.
Re: john fury
Posted: 22 Oct 2018, 12:16
by SAPFO
20-18 BUMP !!

Re: john fury
Posted: 22 Oct 2018, 13:07
by Oiky
She's some thread for one thread

Re: john fury
Posted: 22 Oct 2018, 13:37
by Nightmare Roy

Id forgot about Henry's Gypsy love

Re: john fury
Posted: 22 Oct 2018, 14:07
by SAPFO
Anybody posted this to Tysons twitter for the crack?
Re: john fury
Posted: 22 Oct 2018, 14:16
by jamesmcdonnell
banjo wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 07:02
Boxerbeetle wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:
This is a superb argument.

I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.
Could have been worse, could have been a squatter
Re: john fury
Posted: 22 Oct 2018, 18:40
by deadpan
banjo wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 07:02
Boxerbeetle wrote:Boxerbeetle wrote:
This is a superb argument.

I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.
Mitchell Quy! I could watch documentaries about that delusional scumbucket every hour for the rest of my days.
My favourite moment was when he said on camera 'there is only one person who knows what happened between me and my wife, and that's me'.
Er, wouldn't your wife who 'walked out on you' know as well? Oh hang on, you killed her.
The fact that the Police took so long to prosecute him was a fecking travesty, the dozy dolts.
Re: john fury
Posted: 30 Sep 2019, 04:41
by Wee Tommy
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑19 Dec 2015, 18:24
bripez wrote:Henry, you need to let it go mate - I am sure life will get more positive and happy if you do rather than dwelling on stuff that might have hapoened hundreds of years ago and spending your time listening to people telling romanticised tales if a bygone era that never was whilst using selective facts.
I'm sure that's what slave owners said to the Africans, before boarding them on the ships too.
This says it all

Re: john fury
Posted: 18 Nov 2019, 18:44
by handsofstone
Terry's asked me to point out Frank and Big John are mates and the stories nonsense
Re: john fury
Posted: 18 Nov 2019, 19:04
by margaret thatcher
I credit the effort though, was a good thread

Re: john fury
Posted: 19 Nov 2019, 06:55
by mickey1975
handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Nov 2019, 18:44
Terry's asked me to point out Frank and Big John are mates and the stories nonsense
Was thinking of this when reading Terrys article on Frank in Boxing News. Frank still sounded a bit highly strung when telling the story of the bouncer.
Re: john fury
Posted: 19 Nov 2019, 08:28
by Coco
I still like to think it's true! Great story
Re: john fury
Posted: 19 Nov 2019, 09:27
by bripez
Coco wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 08:28
I still like to think it's true! Great story
Same here - top story, I’m a believer !
Re: john fury
Posted: 19 Nov 2019, 10:41
by mickey1975
Coco wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 08:28
I still like to think it's true! Great story
I suspect it actually is. It’s very factually correct, with Celesbanksi’s gym, etc.