Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:27
I've even told him I agree it should be a NC, or at least that I'd perfectly understand that. He just can't get over it
BoxRec
Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Page 19 of 21
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:30
on this forum there is just a group of posters who like to attack others and ''mocking them'' (in fact most of them just show how stupid and childish they are). except when i have posted about the WBO's decision and the Briedis video, i am almost exclusively replying to them, then they say that i'm ''crying'' and ''can't stop talking about it''
most of boxing fans (just like in the poll) think just like me in this case. maybe that's what annoys them so much?
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:30
and so are you. you have already made 100 posts or so.gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:26And yet here you still are.dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:26
do i? you are simply wrong. i was back to the topic when WBO revealed their opinion on the protest and when Briedis posted his video, that's it.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:31
I'm annoyed by whiny asses personally. Of all 58 people who agreed with you on that poll 57 of them ain't still talking about it. Just your whiny ass.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:32
That's right, and I'll be here until you move on. You deserve to get your balls busted to pieces for not moving on with your life just like Glowacki deserved that elbow to the jaw for committing a blatant foul.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:34
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:35
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:38
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:39
you clearly got emotional there admit it, it's okay, nothing wrong with that 
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:41
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:30on this forum there is just a group of posters who like to attack others and ''mocking them'' (in fact most of them just show how stupid and childish they are). except when i have posted about the WBO's decision and the Briedis video, i am almost exclusively replying to them, then they say that i'm ''crying'' and ''can't stop talking about it''
most of boxing fans (just like in the poll) think just like me in this case. maybe that's what annoys them so much?
And some posters are just masochists.Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:41
Dag - let me take that shovel from you, bruh.dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:39 you clearly got emotional there admit it, it's okay, nothing wrong with that
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:49
they're accusing me of being emotional while at some point they got much more emotional than me and they don't see how pathetic they are 
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:55
dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:49 they're accusing me of being emotional while at some point they got much more emotional than me and they don't see how pathetic they are
You need to get your eyes checked. “They” are all you in the mirror.Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 14:57
i would probably stop to post in this topic long time ago if not some posters who think i'm crying, they're making themselves look so silly, it's funnyironbeard wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:55dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:49 they're accusing me of being emotional while at some point they got much more emotional than me and they don't see how pathetic they are
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 15:09
Projection can be a handy skill.dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:57i would probably stop to post in this topic long time ago if not some posters who think i'm crying, they're making themselves look so silly, it's funny
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 16:31
Hitting yourself won't lessen that opinion.dagilechia wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:19Onetimeonly wrote: ↑12 Jul 2019, 14:18
Anyone that can't see you're emotional would have to be an infant.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 16:34
well said. you forgot to add ''wrong'' in there.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 12 Jul 2019, 16:45
Yeah, you're not upset.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 13 Jul 2019, 02:27
Some thread this.
Both were intentional fouls I thought.
The referee has too much discretion in these instances ranging from a warning, a point deduction, a two point deduction or a disqualification. That's too wide a range to put in the hands of one person imo. The rules need to be more specific.
Both were intentional fouls I thought.
The referee has too much discretion in these instances ranging from a warning, a point deduction, a two point deduction or a disqualification. That's too wide a range to put in the hands of one person imo. The rules need to be more specific.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 13 Jul 2019, 13:52
The point deduction was good enough. The biggest f*ck up from the ref was not stopping the action when the bell rang to end the 2nd round. That's a hearing problem. Nothing a rule change could do about that, but it means the dude either needs a hearing aid or needs to stop officiating if he can't hear the f*cking bell.ewenhay wrote: ↑13 Jul 2019, 02:27 Some thread this.
Both were intentional fouls I thought.
The referee has too much discretion in these instances ranging from a warning, a point deduction, a two point deduction or a disqualification. That's too wide a range to put in the hands of one person imo. The rules need to be more specific.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 13 Jul 2019, 14:22
That was worse than hearing problem. The guy was afraid to separate the boxers.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 13 Jul 2019, 14:31
Ya think? I'll have to watch that part again, and see if that's how it comes across. They were getting after it pretty hard at that moment.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑13 Jul 2019, 14:22 That was worse than hearing problem. The guy was afraid to separate the boxers.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 14 Jul 2019, 05:33
this video starts in a moment in which you can clearly see that Byrd did heard the bellgilgamesh wrote: ↑13 Jul 2019, 14:31Ya think? I'll have to watch that part again, and see if that's how it comes across. They were getting after it pretty hard at that moment.boxing_rocks wrote: ↑13 Jul 2019, 14:22 That was worse than hearing problem. The guy was afraid to separate the boxers.
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 24 Sep 2019, 06:27
It's funny how people who called me a crybaby in this topic just because in my opinion Briedis should be DQ'd and shouldn't win this fight (at least a NC) while they cry themselves that Ward should be DQ'd in Kovalyov 2 fight
Re: Briedis-Glowacki should be NC, yes or no ?
Posted: 24 Sep 2019, 07:46
That just came to you 3 months later? You're still sobbing!