Page 19 of 24
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 07:25
by EddieShredder
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 07:37
by dalek
bell bats as if he's a rabbit frozen in front of a cars headlights.his temprement isn't up to it i'm afraid.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 07:38
by EddieShredder
dalek wrote:bell bats as if he's a rabbit frozen in front of a cars headlights.his temprement isn't up to it i'm afraid.
Whilst he has looked poor this series, apart from his pair of fifties.... I still think he's worth sticking with, and he'll turn into a very good batsman down the line.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 08:36
by EddieShredder
132/4 - Pieterson gone now... Warne gets his 4th :x
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 08:40
by states
Can't Warne have one off day? Just one? Australia are going to have a massive job on their hands replacing him and McGrath. I see a few lean (by Aussie standards) years ahead for them.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 09:38
by Coconut
This young Bell character seems to be one for the future. But for today, we need someone else.
It's really noticeable how good Warne is. The best side in the world and they're hugely reliant on the portly phone perve.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 09:45
by leforge
Bell is not upto the job imo. Its alright performing against Bangladesh but you need something special against Australia.
Come on Strauss and Freddie put a big stand on.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:07
by EddieShredder
leforge wrote:Bell is not upto the job imo. Its alright performing against Bangladesh but you need something special against Australia.
Come on Strauss and Freddie put a big stand on.
He's only young though, and very inexperienced at test level. People underestimate the difference between test bowlers, and first class county bowlers.... even when test bowlers play for their county, they rarely put it in like they do for their country anymore.
I genuinly think Bell will mature into the role.... but like anything, he'll have to get used to the level he's playing at first and agin the experience.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:22
by nickd
EddieShredder wrote:leforge wrote:Bell is not upto the job imo. Its alright performing against Bangladesh but you need something special against Australia.
Come on Strauss and Freddie put a big stand on.
He's only young though, and very inexperienced at test level. People underestimate the difference between test bowlers, and first class county bowlers.... even when test bowlers play for their county, they rarely put it in like they do for their country anymore.
I genuinly think Bell will mature into the role.... but like anything, he'll have to get used to the level he's playing at first and agin the experience.
One for the future no doubt, should he have been in this Ashes series? I'd say no, you don't play ones for the future in an Ashes series.
Will be interesting to see how Collingwood gets on against Warne, according to the paper he was the best England batsman against Merlin in the nets. For those who dont know Merlin is a leg spinning machine that mimicks Warne's bowling.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:27
by states
Any chance we can pick Merlin for the team?
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:38
by nickd
Well done Flintoff thats a great knock, he's really letting the bat go. I love it when he starts whacking it about.
Hope Strauss gets his century.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:41
by states
Well in Strauss. Top knock.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:42
by nickd
Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 10:46
by EddieShredder
nickd wrote:Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
lol..... well done to both of them (Strauss and Flintoff, not Straussy's mrs' shirt potatoes!)
Back in the game a bit now... need to rescue the day still.
Back to Bell.... I agree NickD that maybe he should have been left for the series. With Hindsight, Thorpe would have been the better bet.... but i guess its easy to say that now. Butcher was unfit, and Key is not up to scratch at this level.... Other than Thorpe, the selectors didn't have much choice.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 11:02
by dondada
nickd wrote:Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I must enter this lengthy thread at this late stage. She was well worth one. More than one in fact.
GO ON STRAUSSY!!

Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 11:04
by nickd
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:nickd wrote:Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I must enter this lengthy thread at this late stage. She was well worth one. More than one in fact.
GO ON STRAUSSY!!

I'd hit her for six!

Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 11:05
by EddieShredder
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:nickd wrote:Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I must enter this lengthy thread at this late stage. She was well worth one. More than one in fact.
GO ON STRAUSSY!!

Flintoffs mrs is a fookin belter aswell :P
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 11:21
by dondada
nickd wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:nickd wrote:Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I must enter this lengthy thread at this late stage. She was well worth one. More than one in fact.
GO ON STRAUSSY!!

I'd hit her for six!

Jesus Nick, I'd settle for a scampered single!!

Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 11:27
by nickd
I wish they wouldn't keep replaying all the wickets of the day every half hour or so. I've been caught out about half a dozen times today thinking another wicket had gone!
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 11:37
by states
Flintoff out. Bollocks.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 12:05
by nickd
Collingwood gone, 289-5. The ball is really swinging which is good for England, if the Aussies are getting swing we should be able to move it our boys have got a lot more swing than them this series. Shame Jones isn't fit his reverse swing would have them in fits.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 12:16
by Coconut
EddieShredder wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:nickd wrote:Well done Strauss, your Mrs has a great set of baps on her.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I must enter this lengthy thread at this late stage. She was well worth one. More than one in fact.
GO ON STRAUSSY!!

Flintoffs mrs is a fookin belter aswell :P
Flintoff's old lady runs (I think) Strawberry Promotions, who do all the girlies in skimpies handing out '4' cards and stuff at the test matches.
She's worth a second glance.
Posted: 08 Sep 2005, 21:07
by woe31
Good first days play, the match looks fairly evenly poised at this stage. Hopefully we can knock over the tail within the first 45 minutes and go about reeling in the total. Was very impressed with Strauss today, he showed a lot of mettle against a bowling attack that finally looked on song.
Posted: 09 Sep 2005, 04:15
by nickd
Warne was as good as I have seen him in a long time yesterday, a spinner getting 5 wickets on the first day at the Oval must be pretty much unheard of. On the turning wickets in India perhaps but on a flat wicket at the Oval? Amazing. He will he a huge loss to cricket when he finally retires
I think the Aussies have a slight edge, I would have liked 450 plus on that pitch at the least. Its still possible I guess lets see how much the tail can add to the total. Anything in the region of 400 has got to be good from here.
Will be interesting to see how the Aussies bat, England have been excellent with the ball this series.
Posted: 09 Sep 2005, 06:48
by nickd
373 all out. Not too bad considering how we were this morning.
Harmison is always good value, terrible technique but he whacks a few around!