BoxRec

No interview with Fast Eddie.....

I guess he's off counting his cash. Should be wearing a mask after that card.

Horse wrote:

stevedoc wrote:What is wrong with this horse...

Try reading it again.

So you think quigg won.

stevedoc wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Justice is served. No way in the world Quigg won that fight. 116-112 by anyone who knows how to score a boxing contest.

What is wrong with this horse...

Fvck knows mate. Lives at home with his mam. Never been to a live boxing event. Doesn't subscribe to Box N4tion. Is never wrong. Must have his ducks in a row. On the autistic spectrum. Never been laid. Has no girlfriend. Hates me.

stevedoc wrote:So you think quigg won.

Try reading it again.

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Fvck knows mate. Lives at home with his mam. Never been to a live boxing event. Doesn't subscribe to Box N4tion. Is never wrong. Must have his ducks in a row. On the autistic spectrum. Never been laid. Has no girlfriend. Hates me.

Apart from that you quite like him tho.

Taansend wrote:

Loftgroov wrote:I cant see a rematch here. Frampton probably knows he'd lose it - Quigg wouldn't eff up the same way again and would stick his foot on the gas much earlier. The McGuigans also wouldn't risk losing the bragging rights.

Of course, the counter argument to this is that by forcing things earlier Quigg would open himself up to counters & not have the strength or energy later on to close the show.

Quigg started very slow & came on later but that doesn't automatically equate to him winning if he starts fast in a rematch.

Saunders-Eubank Jr debate all over again.

keithmoonhangover wrote:Fvck knows mate. Lives at home with his mam. Never been to a live boxing event. Doesn't subscribe to Box N4tion. Is never wrong. Must have his ducks in a row. On the autistic spectrum. Never been laid. Has no girlfriend. Hates me.

Anyone can make things up.

Taansend wrote:

Loftgroov wrote:I cant see a rematch here. Frampton probably knows he'd lose it - Quigg wouldn't eff up the same way again and would stick his foot on the gas much earlier. The McGuigans also wouldn't risk losing the bragging rights.

Of course, the counter argument to this is that by forcing things earlier Quigg would open himself up to counters & not have the strength or energy later on to close the show.

Quigg started very slow & came on later but that doesn't automatically equate to him winning if he starts fast in a rematch.

It's a fair point. Perhaps both fighters were actually struggling with the weight after all & it affected both of their tactics more than we realise at the moment?

Taansend wrote:

Loftgroov wrote:I cant see a rematch here. Frampton probably knows he'd lose it - Quigg wouldn't eff up the same way again and would stick his foot on the gas much earlier. The McGuigans also wouldn't risk losing the bragging rights.

Of course, the counter argument to this is that by forcing things earlier Quigg would open himself up to counters & not have the strength or energy later on to close the show.

Quigg started very slow & came on later but that doesn't automatically equate to him winning if he starts fast in a rematch.

Both are perfectly valid points. If I'm Frampton I wouldnt bother with the rematch, it's not his fault that Quigg fvcked up his tactics. There are good fights out there at SBW or FW for Frampton, he doesnt gain much from the rematch. Also, it wouldnt be an easy sell, pretty crap fight for a PPV.

expe wrote:

Taansend wrote:

Loftgroov wrote:I cant see a rematch here. Frampton probably knows he'd lose it - Quigg wouldn't eff up the same way again and would stick his foot on the gas much earlier. The McGuigans also wouldn't risk losing the bragging rights.

Of course, the counter argument to this is that by forcing things earlier Quigg would open himself up to counters & not have the strength or energy later on to close the show.

Quigg started very slow & came on later but that doesn't automatically equate to him winning if he starts fast in a rematch.

Saunders-Eubank Jr debate all over again.

Yep....I can understand both sides.

jameswilson wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Fvck knows mate. Lives at home with his mam. Never been to a live boxing event. Doesn't subscribe to Box N4tion. Is never wrong. Must have his ducks in a row. On the autistic spectrum. Never been laid. Has no girlfriend. Hates me.

Apart from that you quite like him tho.

I start out liking everyone and it's their job to fvck it up. He acts like a child mate. Can't be doing with it. Don't enjoy coming on here any more. Some of the people on here are really cool, you included. But it's the loons mate. Can't be arsed mate.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:Fvck knows mate. Lives at home with his mam. Never been to a live boxing event. Doesn't subscribe to Box N4tion. Is never wrong. Must have his ducks in a row. On the autistic spectrum. Never been laid. Has no girlfriend. Hates me.

Anyone can make things up.

If it's made up, tell me which bits are wrong. If you're not prepared to do that, then STFU.

Even now that's out of the way, neither of them will go anywhere near Rigo.

Gallagher said to him at the end of the 4th or 5th "your boxing well" for the life of me what was he watching. No doubt Frampton won but when Quigg upped the pace he was on top and although we will never know but if he shares the first six rounds, he wins the fight.

Scott basically gave away the first three rounds to a guy who landed about 10 punches in total, that is absolutely unforgiveable in any fight let alone a World title unification.

scott quiggs "gameplan" saw one man in that ring tonight, where ever quigg was i do not know

Wow.... Another awful bill. It almost makes me wish for the days of Cleverly-Bellew 2.....

keithmoonhangover wrote:If it's made up, tell me which bits are wrong. If you're not prepared to do that, then STFU.

It's none of your business.

Right man won. Thought Frampton should have gone for it in those early rounds when Quigg looked like he had frozen on the big stage. The rounds Quigg won he won bigger but 116-112 was about right. Sky commentary was terrible, you could almost tell they were being fed lines.

Boxerbeetle wrote:Even now that's out of the way, neither of them will go anywhere near Rigo.

If it's the right deal, I think they both will. Quigg has got nowt to lose now. He might as well fight Rigo. Although, if he throws away the first seven rounds, by throwing hardly any punches, he's gonna struggle. If he fights like that, he needs a knockdown to draw. Joe Gallagher reminded me of the Petronellis in Hagler's corner for the Leonard fight. Gallagher should have been telling Quigg to not stop punching until he knocked Frampton out. What would Manny Stewart have done? What would Angie Dundee done? Eddie Futch?

dbf wrote:Right man won. Thought Frampton should have gone for it in those early rounds when Quigg looked like he had frozen on the big stage. The rounds Quigg won he won bigger but 116-112 was about right. Sky commentary was terrible, you could almost tell they were being fed lines.

I have to mute it after a while. Wish you could have a crowd noise only option like to hear the crowd and take in the atmosphere but hate the bull shit they come out with on sky

Another disappointing night of boxing after all the hype. I'm going to bed to sulk, at least I'll be able to watch Crawford do his thing when I wake up tomorrow morning.

If I ever mention buying another Sky PPV, please remind me to get a CAT scan.

Horse wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:If it's made up, tell me which bits are wrong. If you're not prepared to do that, then STFU.

It's none of your business.

Ha'way Horse, admit it, you're a virgin. We all were once.

dbf wrote:Sky commentary

= shameless cheerleading

I can't stand listening to Sky commentary anymore and pretty much always have it on mute.

Boxerbeetle wrote:Another disappointing night of boxing after all the hype. I'm going to bed to sulk, at least I'll be able to watch Crawford do his thing when I wake up tomorrow morning.

If I ever mention buying another Sky PPV, please remind me to get a CAT scan.

keithmoonhangover wrote:Ha'way Horse, admit it, you're a virgin. We all were once.

Why don't you admit that you are a sex offender?

You really do give off creepy vibes.