BoxRec

Takam should fight Dillian.

Can someone explain how the doctor took a really hard look at pulling Takam out in the 9th , but didn't even look at the cuts before the 10th , had they got better over that round ?

Would like to see a rematch of this fight

Guess we'll never see that .

Tuan_Jim wrote:

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:
What does turn it in mean? What am I to turn in? Instruct.

Stop talking shite.

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.

Very new to boxing?

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?

deadpan wrote:Takam should fight Dillian.

I think he'd win.

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

Covfefe wrote:
Stop talking shite.

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.

Very new to boxing?

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?

The minority that doesn't think that was a gift stoppage.

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

Covfefe wrote:
Stop talking shite.

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.

Very new to boxing?

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?

The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.

Deserter wrote:Sure it’s not lost on anybody that by that criteria Joshua would have been stopped by the ref at least twice in the Klit fight. Shocking double standards.

jamamb wrote:maybe not bought like suggested, but i do agree with those who say he was looking for it.

Aye, not bought, but clearly influenced by the location.

Unlike most of you, though, I still think that Joshua beats Fury. Fury's power isn't enough to stop Joshua, so he'd have to be in peak fitness to do it on points.

BitPlayer wrote:

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.

Very new to boxing?

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?

The minority that doesn't think that was a gift stoppage.

I was the first post to say it was a bad stoppage. It was way too soon, I’m not arguing it wasn’t. Tuan_jim has invented that entirely.

Bad stoppage for so many reasons.

It's the Heavyweight Championship of the World. Takam deserved much better, and had already taken much worse. He was in 'fine' condition to continue.

AJ did land an absolute peach about 30 seconds prior to start the chain of events, but at that point you can see the ref moving in and itching to stop it, which he did after AJ failed to land his next four punches.

Stopped off one punch, which had Takam at worst, slightly wobbled.

wesshaw1985 wrote:https://twitter.com/peterfury/status/924398742312243201

Poor stoppage but that's a bit of bullshit to be fair.

Got the fight at 12 days but wasn't he put on notice 10 weeks ago?

Also, premature stoppage just prevented an 11-1 scorecard in favour of Joshua when he was a touch off colour.

Anyway, it's not like his boy will have any say soon. Tyson needs to come back or they should just stop chatting bollocks

Covfefe wrote:Paid to look after him.

Go away horse.

Do you work for the BBBofC?

Stop being such an establishment suck-up.

Tuan_Jim wrote:

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.

Very new to boxing?

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?

The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.

I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.

I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon.

You’re a joke.

Horse wrote:

Covfefe wrote:Paid to look after him.

Go away horse.

Do you work for the BBBofC?

Stop being such an establishment suck-up.

Get some new material.

deadpan wrote:Takam should fight Dillian.

Yeah, good fight that one - I think it is perfect for Dillian. I really am concerned now about Dillian's chin / balance, so Takam's lack of power could be good for Dillian. Hard fight to call, but Takam's stock isn't going to be much higher than it is now.

rd350lc wrote:Can someone explain how the doctor took a really hard look at pulling Takam out in the 9th , but didn't even look at the cuts before the 10th , had they got better over that round ?

Would like to see a rematch of this fight

Guess we'll never see that .

I get people saying it was an early stoppage. But a rematch? Joshua won every round and totally dominated.

Seemed an early stoppage, but did feel Joshua would have stopped Takam late.

Overall show was garbage, only salvaged by a super fit girl with amazing tits who kept dancing around in the row in front of me.

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

Covfefe wrote:
Very new to boxing?

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?

The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.

I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.

I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon.

You’re a joke.

Then what the Sam Hill are you arguing?

Blind Freddy could see the Tactics were to make AJ work and go for a late stoppage if he tired , Wether or not it would of worked we will never know , because the ref did'nt allow it , But facts are dispite the cut dispite anything and everything , Takam was still in the fight , he was,t hurt , he did'nt actually take many clean punches when he was stopped , it was going to 12 and Aj WAS TIRING ,, anyone with half a brain knows its when your tired you can go , Takam was'nt given the chance , that ref was looking to stop the fight and he done it .. Klitchko had AJ in worse bother , so its double standards british style

Covfefe wrote:

Get some new material.

When you stop worshipping the establishment then I'll stop repeating the same stuff.

i thought takam arguably won a round or two. aj obviously way ahead though. ya, no rematch, but still i hope takam gets a good fight to make up for the bs. he deserved to continue. being the first to take aj the distance wouldve been a significant thing.

Tuan_Jim wrote:

Covfefe wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.

I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.

I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon.

You’re a joke.

Then what the Sam Hill are you arguing?

That nothing corrupt happened, which was what you said in the post I replied too before you started making stuff up. Nothing corrupt happened there, it was just a poor stoppage.

Horse wrote:

Covfefe wrote:

Get some new material.

When you stop worshipping the establishment then I'll stop repeating the same stuff.

Should I worship you, should I build an effigy to horse in my yard and pray to it?

lillywhite14 wrote:

wesshaw1985 wrote:https://twitter.com/peterfury/status/924398742312243201

Poor stoppage but that's a bit of bullshit to be fair.

Got the fight at 12 days but wasn't he put on notice 10 weeks ago?

Also, premature stoppage just prevented an 11-1 scorecard in favour of Joshua when he was a touch off colour.

Anyway, it's not like his boy will have any say soon. Tyson needs to come back or they should just stop chatting bollocks

I'm afraid that's all he is capable of , plus he really enjoys it .

jamamb wrote:i thought takam arguably won a round or two. aj obviously way ahead though. ya, no rematch, but still i hope takam gets a good fight to make up for the bs. he deserved to continue. being the first to take aj the distance wouldve been a significant thing.

Defenitely.

I just seen that security guy in the background there, the one who shouted " that's bang out of order" was it during a Bellew/Haye presser?


Either way he's hilarious