Page 3 of 7
Re: What a great great fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 06:49
by Syntax Error
The British are gathering quite a collection of exciting fighters.
Froch is now right up there with David Haye.
They're both very similar in many ways.
Re: What a great great fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:01
by banjo
crusader wrote:That was a great ending. Even if the fight had been complete shit to that it would of been worth watching. Last second come from behind knock outs are what makes boxing so great. Anything can happen at any time. After being pissed off about the mismatches in Germany today, I was greatly cheered up by this fight.
That's what I tried telling some of the yanks on the Current Scene, would they listen though? Noooo, now they're claiming Taylor is either shot or somehow managed to beat himself
![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:02
by observer1
Froch should do what Joe did his entire career now.
Stay in Nottingham and defend the belt against mandatories.
Hey.. if it worked for joe...
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:11
by Autobarn
observer1 wrote:Froch should do what Joe did his entire career now.
Stay in Nottingham and defend the belt against mandatories.
Hey.. if it worked for joe...
No!
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:11
by Autobarn
Spud wrote:Autobarn wrote:What's the mandatory situation - are the WBC making him fight another mandatory or is there room to fit something else in?
Dont know what the exact ruling is - but normally after a champion has fulfilled his mandatory requirements in this cas Froch has - he then has so many months before his next one is due - in this time he can have voluntary defences.
I was thinking, given that he won a vacant belt, apparently he has to make 2 mandatories.
Looks like Andre Ward (#2) v Edison Miranda (#7) winner next.
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:16
by Spud
Lets hope TV now gets behind Froch!!!

Re: Carl Froch still champion
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:17
by DG.
rhino222 wrote:well...only an idiot would come onto the forum if they did not want to know the result.
shout it from the rooftops.....well done carl.... :P
Still, the title should change.
Some people might not be abke to help themselves!
Well done Carl! Any footage of the stoppage? My stream stopped!

Re: What a great great fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:22
by belowthebelt
banjo wrote:crusader wrote:That was a great ending. Even if the fight had been complete shit to that it would of been worth watching. Last second come from behind knock outs are what makes boxing so great. Anything can happen at any time. After being pissed off about the mismatches in Germany today, I was greatly cheered up by this fight.
That's what I tried telling some of the yanks on the Current Scene, would they listen though? Noooo, now they're claiming Taylor is either shot or somehow managed to beat himself
![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
one yank told me that taylor is obviously shot because of how he went down against froch

even though taylor went down worse in the first pavlik fight

this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:26
by boxerbob
i think taylor would beat froch because he has mixed it in much higher opposition , froch has got a world title by failing to beat a real world class fighter.
pascal is probably a top 10-15 fighter in the super-middle division
but...... if froch manages to beat taylor then froch will have a massive career as he will have beaten a genuine world class fighter in taylor
now we know people......carl froch is truely a world class fighter , beating taylor has proved this massively
well done carl , look forward to your next fight
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:28
by Spud
Said it from his very first fight and you ****s slagged me off for saying it - I will accept many peoples apologies on this thread!!!
I think it was me and Chambers who were the only people who backed Froch in those early days!!!
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:28
by TheCobra
Froch now HAS to stay at home for 2 fights at least and fight one easy voluntary, e.g. Miranda. Just get a good win against an easier foe and in that time he needs to think about whether carrying the left so low could ever be changed or whether it would wreck his style.
Also I thought his footwork last night was very slow compared to Taylor which meant he couldnt get near punching range for the first 5 rounds.
Footwork and defence for me his 2 main weaknesses.
But hey, what a performance, ITV should get RIGHT behind him, his last 2 fights now have been classics, his next fight hopefully could maybe be in a bit bigger venue somewhere, not sure what else Nottingham has tho as the arena I guess is the biggest indoor place they have.
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:29
by TheCobra
Ive backed Froch through-out, since seeing him on BBC making his early pro waves. You can tell when someone has cewrtain world class atrubutes and Ive always believed Froch has those, so Ive never truly understood the doubters. He has vulnerabilities yes, but he has a world class punch/finish and at any weight thats a leveller.
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:34
by boxerbob
look im a big fan of froch
that was my reason though for picking taylor though , taylor had fought and beat better people that froch
where does froch go now though??
a 2nd defence in the uk on prime time tv should be his reward
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:36
by TheCobra
boxerbob wrote:look im a big fan of froch
that was my reason though for picking taylor though , taylor had fought and beat better people that froch
where does froch go now though??
a 2nd defence in the uk on prime time tv should be his reward
Froch was 14 seconds from getting beat so it wasnt a bad prediciton, I just don't know why we dont have more faith in our UK boxers, keep the faith lads, I almost lost it halfway through the fight last night was sickened by the first 5-6 rounds!
Defo an easier defence on prime time itv, get himself a half-decent payday.
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:37
by hitman_hatton1
it's difficult to compare calzaghe & froch.
calzaghe didn't have the marquee names around him at the time.
the middleweight dvision was dead for yrs until the tito-hopkins fight.
the super middleweight division has usually always been fairly dead in as far as names.
the only name around calzaghe was at light heavy.
it's a shame they didn't properly push for that roy jones fight in the early 00's.

Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:40
by boxerbob
he must have been paid well for that fight last night???
anyone know the figures?
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:42
by DG.
I say REMATCH!
Froch woukd stop him earlier next time, but he would also make MILLIONS!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:44
by TheCobra
boxerbob wrote:he must have been paid well for that fight last night???
anyone know the figures?
I can't see it being a major payday to be honest. Foxwoods is small in crowd terms, Showtime aren't a massive tv company. Overall I can't see the revenues being that big, I think Froch took it more on the chance to make a statement than to make much dosh. As the champ he will have probably got the bigger purse but who knows what they took.
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:45
by TheCobra
DG. wrote:I say REMATCH!
Froch woukd stop him earlier next time, but he would also make MILLIONS!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Rematch would get the american tv interested again I suppose. Make Taylor travel this time and take a low purse, basically make him be the beggar this time, give up all the advantages cos that's what Carl did and still won! COME ON! haha
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:50
by Coco
I imagine Taylor would only take a rematch if he was at home and had a champions purse
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:50
by Wrists
Spud, Autobarn
I give Froch all the credit in the world (read my preview on BBN to see what I said, I praise Froch quite a lot, attitude, balls etc etc).
My point (apologies for the 'you talk shite' remark) was that surely a guy who essentially outclasses someone then gets KO'd in the last round deserves a rematch???
I stand by what I say in terms of Froch' ability - many people on here are praising him to the hilt and are using Calzaghe as a comparison to big up Froch so surely an alternative viewpoint is ok as well?
Kessler - wins a wide UD against Froch punctuated by a 2/3 KD's.
Bute - ok maybe I went overboard there, close fight though
Calzaghe - would do a Lacy on Froch, too fast, and Carl is too slow
All comments welcome gentleman
Kevin - aka Wrists
Spud - your a little touch mind aren't you, is it because Maloney allegedly made you buy your own drinks that time?? lol
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Carl "Bad Intentions" Froch
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:52
by statmanjohn
type 'aaf froch' into google. something interesting comes up ;;-)
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:53
by Wrists
Said somewhere he was getting around £500,000
Not big money for a world champ by any means
Deserves to really cash in now, even if its just reward for his attitude.
I would give him 2/3 easyish defences now, people like Miranda, even Quigley to build him up.
Then put Froch in with a Pavlik or a Bute
Then the real test Kessler.
At the mo Kessler wins handily. 18 months away may be a different story
Re: this is what i said before the froch vs taylor fight
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:54
by boxerbob
not sure about that mate
taylor was the number 1 contender so unless froch was lured to the usa with lots of ££££ then the fight would have went to purse bids
hopefully he got more than £500k
Re: I can't sleep lads!
Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 07:56
by DG.
search wrote:im from dublin but im still over the moon for the chap. gonna try turning off the laptop now chaps. outstanding night had by all. juan manuel lopez capped it off with an absolute hiding as well.
great great night. il remember this for a long time.
THANK GOD FOR FREE STREAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Search!!!
You do know the Lopez fight is on Setanta in 35 minutes for thoise os us trying to AVOID the result..
Thanks!
