Re: Bernard Hopkins vs Carl Froch could be ON
Posted: 06 May 2009, 20:55
Facts are Facts.
Only reason Joe got the decision was because of Work-Rate. Froch doesn't have that.
Looking post-bout, Hopkins looked the exact same as he did when he entered. Whereas Calzaghe had a few bruises and a plaster on his face.
In terms on actually landing effective punches, Hopkins Schooled Joe. In terms of Pitty-Pattying a Points win, it was Joe. Either way you look at it, it was nothing more than a Draw. Neither guy won it.
That said, Froch is not going to Pitty-Patty his way to a Points win, only thing he has got is Strength.
Against a 44 year old man, who knows.
Only reason Joe got the decision was because of Work-Rate. Froch doesn't have that.
Looking post-bout, Hopkins looked the exact same as he did when he entered. Whereas Calzaghe had a few bruises and a plaster on his face.
In terms on actually landing effective punches, Hopkins Schooled Joe. In terms of Pitty-Pattying a Points win, it was Joe. Either way you look at it, it was nothing more than a Draw. Neither guy won it.
That said, Froch is not going to Pitty-Patty his way to a Points win, only thing he has got is Strength.
Against a 44 year old man, who knows.