Page 3 of 4
Re: The Most Misleading Records in Boxing History
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 00:46
by gensu3k1
""Who were these 6-7 guys? Other than Roman and Moon?"
Roman, Moon, Watanabe, Konadu, Laciar, Ramos were all better than anyone Galaxy faced."
We've already established that Watanabe ducked Galaxy, not the other way around.
Laciar was a very good flyweight, but it seems to me that the only thing he accomplished at 115 was beating Roman. I confess I haven't seen him fight, but his record at 115 isn't that great. Was he really better than Ellyas Pical? Or Contreras?
I do think that Galaxy coasted over the last three years of his career.
"It's not just 1 guy; when a guy ducks everyone, then you have to raise questions."
Well, I know that Watanabe ducked him. But I don't know that it was Galaxy who prevented fights with Moon, Roman and Konadu from happening. Are you sure that all those fighters would have taken a fight with Galaxy, and that it was Khaosai who didn't want to face them?
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 00:51
by gensu3k1
""I actually think Konadu hit even harder than Moon."
I beg to differ. Very very strongly on this one. Nana was more a boxer-puncher who threw sharp, crisp punches, not atomic shots."
Ah, but often those guys are the ones who get the most spectacular KOs. His KO percentage is about equal to Moon's. Have you seen his KO of Sahaprom?
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 00:52
by gensu3k1
joonie73 wrote:By the way, Gensu, I am curious:
Since you have seen Chitalada v. Chang II, who did you think won the fight?
I am actually doing a survey on that fight & as the result was very controversial in Korea.
To be perfectly honest, I found it so boring that I didn't get through the whole thing. I'll give it another chance this weekend and get back to you with my score.
Re: The Most Misleading Records in Boxing History
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:10
by joonie73
"I confess I haven't seen him fight, but his record at 115 isn't that great. Was he really better than Ellyas Pical? Or Contreras?"
Very much so. I don't think there is a comparison. Further, because of Laciar's great chin & ruggedness, he would have posed an interesting challenge for Galaxy.
"Are you sure that all those fighters would have taken a fight with Galaxy, and that it was Khaosai who didn't want to face them?"
I can't say for sure. But when a guy doesn't fight not just 1 or 2 top guys but a half dozen or more of them, the burden of proof, common sense dictates, lies with him.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:12
by joonie73
gensu3k1 wrote:joonie73 wrote:By the way, Gensu, I am curious:
Since you have seen Chitalada v. Chang II, who did you think won the fight?
I am actually doing a survey on that fight & as the result was very controversial in Korea.
To be perfectly honest, I found it so boring that I didn't get through the whole thing. I'll give it another chance this weekend and get back to you with my score.
Thanks; I'd appreciate it.
I am willing to send you tapes of the prime Chang as well, because the Chang that fought Chiquita, Chitalada (the 2nd time) & Kittikasem was a shell of his former self. The prime Chang, for many who have seen him, was the best flyweight at least since Canto.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:18
by joonie73
A few other lists from guys who are very knowledgeable about Asian boxing (though I disagree violently with some of these lists):
Realjoonie:
1. Fighting Harada
2. Jung Koo Chang
3. Jiro Watanabe
4. Myung Woo Yuh
5. Pancho Villa
6. Khaosai Galaxy
7. Yoko Gushiken
8. Flash Elorde
9. Sung Kil Moon
10. Masao Ohba
Saldivar:
1. Fighting Harada
2. Panch Villa
3. Jung-Koo Chang
4. Flash Elorde
5. Masao Ohba
6. Pone Kingpetch
7. Kaosai Galaxy
8. Shoji Oguma
9. Chartchai Chionoi
10. Chan-Hee Park
DMille
1) Fighting Harada
2) Pancho Villa
3) Pone Kingpetch
4) Chartchai Chionoi
5) Jung-Koo Chang
6) Masao Ohba
7) Khaosai Galaxy
8) Shoji Oguma
9) Hiroyuki Ebihara
10) Myung-Woo Yuh
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:38
by joonie73
Broncano wrote:TonyJ wrote:whats your take on Watanabe?
He was a smart and versatile southpaw, great skills and didn't lack a punch. Also a very fast counterpuncher, for every punch Ibañez landed he connected 3 or 4 shots, on combinations with a nice double left hook to the body and head.
Thats the only Watanabe fight Ive seen and he just outclassed the challenger. He was only caught once by Ibañez's right hand, the only thing the Peruvian had going for him, and he took it flat on his feet so that showed his chin wasn't doubtful. He was never kayoed in his career but I don't know if he ever tasted the canvas. I wouldn't be surprised if he never did.
It is my understanding that he started boxing late in his life (something like 25 years old), and that prior to that, like many asian fighters, he had been involved in martial arts.
Other good Japanese fighters not mentioned so far would be:
Koichi Wajima
Kuniaki Shibata
Yoko Gushiken
Hiroshi Kobayashi
Masao Ohba & Hiroyuki Ebihara were a class or two above the guys you mentioned above.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:41
by joonie73
Gonads wrote:Jeffsboxing wrote:Just flashing in my brain, another names of Asian fighters:
Mon sun kil
Shinji Matmumura
Saensak Muangsurin
Don't know much about the first 2 but Muangsurin won the WBC lightwelter title in his 3rd pro fight. Still a record today? Must have been a decent fighter. Still, Hearns KO'd him easily
Chong Pal Park (supermiddle titlist) and In Chul Baek anyone?
Park was knickname was "Glass Jaw." Had he actually had a decent chin, he may have turned out to be one of the better Asian boxers ever. But oh well.
In-Chul Baek was a murderous puncher who is, along with Moon, 2 of the hardest punchers to come out of Korea. Unfortunately he ran into Julian Jackson at his natural weight but did redeem himself somewhat by knocking out Obelmejias to win the 168 title well past his prime.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:43
by joonie73
TonyJ wrote:As great as Elorde was many experts still consider Villa the greatest fillipino and asian fighter of all time.
I think virtually everyone in the know consider Harada greater than Villa.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:44
by joonie73
"Galaxy would have been the champion a lot sooner if the 115-pound champs of that time hadn't ducked him for two years. He didn't become champion until Watanabe decided to vacate the WBA title and fight for the WBC version, which allowed Galaxy to fight for and win the WBA crown himself."
Watanabe would have easily beaten Galaxy in my opinion. And so do many knowledgeable guys I have talked to who have seen both of these guys in action.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 01:46
by joonie73
"Ellyas Pical, who was the IBF champ at 115 for most of Galaxy's reign, was the only reigning champ who ever had the balls to get in the ring with Galaxy. He went 14 rounds before Khaosai got him, then won the IBF title back eight months later and held it until 1990. I say anyone who could go 14 rounds with Khaosai Galaxy in 1987 must have been damn good himself."
Matsumura lasted the distance with Galaxy & should've gotten the decision.
And he sucked crapola.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 09:26
by joonie73
terap wrote:"I think virtually everyone in the know consider Harada greater than
Villa."
All very interesting stuff here, guys.
HARADA's achievement with Jofre was remarkable.
But Harada was also KO'd TWICE by Joe Medel.
VILLA was never KO'd in 103 bouts.
Villa had 103 total bouts and lost 4 by decision, one on a foul, and had 4 draws.
In addition to his KO over Jimmy Wilde, Villa won a 12 round decision over Bud Taylor, a great fighter who was also bigger than Villa.
And Villa's career was cut short by his death from blood poisoning from an infected tooth.
I can let each of these guys exist on their own merits.
The compulsion to demand enforced, unnatural comparisons is something I can do without.
And how much do these so vaguely described "everyone in the know " know about Villa---or any earlier fighters?
Terap,
1. Harada split his 2 fights with Medel; he wasn't kayoed twice by Medel.
2. Even if the above were the case, which emphatically is not, counting the number of times a guy is knocked out is not necessarily the best measure of a fighter's worth or the lack thereof. After all, chin isn't the only important aspect of a guy's repertoire. Otherwise Joon-Suk Hwang would be the greatest Asian fighter ever.
3. Sure, Villa beat bigger guys. But so did Harada. Remember, he was a natural flyweight as well. He then not only went on to beat the greatest bantamweight ever twice but a very good featherweight in Famechon (& please, let's not even pretend Famechon won).
4. The knowledgeable people I have spoken to know quite a lot about Villa. It is a bit condescending & I frankly find it incomprehensible that you'd accuse us of not knowing Villa. He is not exactly, say a Hwan-Jin Kim.
I acknowledge his greatness but in my opinion he is given a little too much credit for beating a fossilized Wilde. When he met the other great flyweight he faced, Genaro, Villa was outclassed several times.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 09:50
by joonie73
"The compulsion to demand enforced, unnatural comparisons is something I can do without."
Let me explain myself more clearly in regard to the genealogy of this "unnatural comparison[]":
1. Someone made a comment that Villa is considered the best Asian fighter ever.
2. I will respond that that is not the general view among a) people whom I respect in various boxing fora who knows their Asian boxing & more importantly b) boxing experts in Asia, who should be presumed to know better in regard to their own boxing legacy.
I don't think I am out of line in making such "unnatural comparisons."
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 10:16
by joonie73
terap wrote:My 1981 Ring Record book has Harada losing by KO twice to Joe Medel by KO 6
but in looking at it again I see both dates are Sept. 26, 1963.
So the Ring Record book put out by Bert Sugar and company after Nat Fleischer died can be less than correct.
But the overall point here is that you guys have such an overall knowledge and interest in this area of boxing.
For me, without access to the great majority of these fights, what is posted here is overwhelming since there so many names I am not familiar with---a whole area of boxing that only some are aware of.
Your posts have resulted in giving me the intention to become more familiar with this area gradually in the future.
One thing I could suggest is---for you to make a SHORTER graded list in order of importance in your opinion of the fighters and fights that are absolutely MOST significant from this area (realizing many of us do not have the resources to get everything)
IN YOUR OPINION:
1---What is the single most significant fight to see representing the absolute highest level of all these fights and fighters?
2---In a graded order, just a few more such fights that would be indispensable to begin to gain a knowledge of this area?
3---Which fighters, in your opinion, are absolutely indispensable to see (and which specific fights of theirs) in order to BEGIN to get a knowledge of this area?
Terap,
While I respect & learn a great deal from Western writers like Sugar & the late Fleischer, the fact is they know very little when it comes to Asian fighters & much of what they know is via third-hand anecdotes. I wouldn't rely on them.
As for the top Asian fighters, I would recommend you watch the following fights (the fights named should all be available in the West via tapes):
Fighting Harada:
Jofre I & II, Kingpetch I & II, Famechon I & II
Jung-Koo Chang:
Zapata I & II, Torres I, Chitalada I, Kittikasem
Villa:
don't know if a tape of a full fight exists
Ohba:
Betulio Gonzalez, Chinoi
Elorde:
Saddler I & II, Ortiz I & II
Park:
Canto I & II, Oguma I, II & III, Espadas
Moon:
Konadu I & II, Roman
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 10:34
by joonie73
terap wrote:There are films of Pancho Villa fighting Jimmy Wilde (Villa looks overwhelmingly strong and effective--making me wonder if he would have been too powerful for Wilde at any time)
and also film of Villa KOing Johnny Buff.
Both films of Villa are easily available.
Great; thanks for the heads-up.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 11:09
by joonie73
terap wrote:Thanks for the list.
I will save it.
I have seen the first Harada-Jofre fight--where Harada hurts Jofre terribly withan uppercut at one point.
That is absolutely amazing that Harada was able to beat a great fighter like Jofre when Jofre was also a weight class bigger than he was. And weight means a huge amount at those lower weight levels. Ask Jimmy Wilde.
Flash Elorde was a terrific fighter. The fact that he extended Sandy Saddler as he did, WINNING A DECISION over Saddler and then extending Saddler to 13 rounds in their title fight (which was only stopped in a late round because of a cut) shows his level.
Elorde was really one weight class smaller than Ortiz.
Their second fight took place when Elorde was older.
The last punch in that fight should never have been allowed.
The referee was Ruby Goldstein, who was poison in letting fighters get hurt by letting fights he refereed go one or more punches too long.
Goldstein stood by while Benny Kid Paret was hit with over 20 punches while he was already unconscious and with his head and upper body between the 2nd and 3rd rope.
Goldstein never refereed another fight.
The last punch in the Joe Louis-Marciano fight (refereed by Goldstein) should never have taken place. Goldstein was standing right there--Louis was unconscious, with his behind resting on the 2nd rope holding him up as his head hung forward and his arms were dropped to his sides.
Marciano had a full 2 or more seconds to load up with his final right hand which knocked a totally helpless Louis through the ropes and out of the ring.
Goldstein was standing right there and did nothing.
The end of the Elorde-Ortiz second fight was very similar.
Elorde was in a similar postion on the ropes and had nothing left. Goldstein should never have allowed the final punch from Ortiz.
Ortiz was a top level champion, but I remember my disgust at the ref's non action at the end of that fight, and also at Ortiz' self-serving comments after the fight.
Yeah, Goldstein had an issue with stopping fights in a prompt manner. And coming from me (who thinks fights are always stopped too soon), that says a lot.
Re: Harada v. Jofre. I thought Harada won both fights (some think Jofre won the 1st), but you could tell Jofre's hands were noticeably slower than in his prime; further, he was easily winded. I think the prime Jofre beats Harada.
Harada v. Chang at flyweight would be the fantasy fight from Heaven.
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 11:23
by joonie73
terap wrote:"Yeah, Goldstein had an issue with stopping fights in a prompt manner. And coming from me (who thinks fights are always stopped too soon), that says a lot. "
Yes sir.
And then Goldstein did the opposite in the 2nd Robinson-Turpin fight, stopping the fight in favor of the US fighter (Robinson) with only seconds left in the round and taking Turpin's title away from him while Robinson had a severe cut.
Goldstein would never have stopped the fight at such a point and taken away Robinson's title if the situation had been reversed.
Turpin was dumb to come to the US to defend his title.
Goldstein made a mess out of the Harold Johnson--Archie Moore title fight
by giving Moore a standing count (wrong in a title fight in those days) after Johnson flattened Moore with a right hand in the 10th round--stopping Johnson from getting off another punch at Moore before the round ended.
And then not making Moore go to a neutral corner when Moore knocked Johnson down in the 14th round--enabling Moore to get back at Johnson sooner.
Terap,
I am curious. Are you Benny Yanger?
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 14:55
by TonyJ
Hey Terap where did you find those fights you listed on Villa?
Posted: 19 Sep 2003, 23:11
by TonyJ
I just found a video containing footage of bouts on Villa, Montanna and Ceferino Garcia.
Thanks Terap.
Posted: 21 Sep 2003, 03:55
by joonie73
I received the following e-mail from a poster named Irishlad:
"I want you to do me a favour. I dont want irrelevant human trash like you, soiling respected boxing sites like here and the cbz. There is a reason posters dont want to talk about asian fighters, and thats why nobody gives a shit. In your pathetic two-bit site you have a reputation for playing "follow the leader", but please appreciate that i carry a considerable amount of weight to make things uncomfortable for you. Do yourself a favour. Go away!"
And since I don't need to deal with immature & racist garbage, I am out. If guys wanna discuss Asian fighters you know where to find me: I am a regular contributor at both Boxingtalk "classic" section & Delphi forum.
Posted: 25 Sep 2003, 04:06
by Jeffsboxing
joonie73 wrote:"Ellyas Pical, who was the IBF champ at 115 for most of Galaxy's reign, was the only reigning champ who ever had the balls to get in the ring with Galaxy. He went 14 rounds before Khaosai got him, then won the IBF title back eight months later and held it until 1990. I say anyone who could go 14 rounds with Khaosai Galaxy in 1987 must have been damn good himself."
Matsumura lasted the distance with Galaxy & should've gotten the decision.
And he sucked crapola.
I just made an interview with Ellyas Pical, and soon it will be published somewhere. There's something about Elly Pical vs Galaxy that was really a war. I will tell you a little about Pical vs Galaxy, that Pical was actually having no intention to fight Galaxy, but his crokked promoter insisted and deceived him to take the challenge. Pical was dominating the fight until 10 when Galaxy was rocked. After 10 Pical got weakened because of being frustration to face the reality that Galaxy was so durable to take his "exocet" left hooks to the face. Pical confessed he gave up on 14th as he was frustrated besides his unprofessional corner-men. I will show you the interview later.
Posted: 13 Aug 2005, 00:58
by meade95
joonie73 wrote:gensu3k1 wrote:
More damagingly still, he was awarded at least half a dozen hometown gifts among his many defenses.
____________________________
You are speaking of Khaosai Galaxy with the above quote -
How utterly foolish - Galaxy scored 16 or 17 KO's in his 19 defenses (therefore it is impossible for your ridiculous notion to even be true...that he was given a half dozen hometown gift decisons during his 19 defenses) -
You simply haven't a clue to what you are talking about with regard to Galaxy - I have dozens of his fights on tape - The man was simply brutal and relentless -
And he fought every bit as good of competition as did Sung Kil Moon (another favorite of mine - It was Moon who avoided him back when they were both JBW champions)
Posted: 13 Aug 2005, 01:07
by meade95
joonie73 - With all due respect - Get out of town with this garbage that Matsumura really won the first fight with Galaxy - I have it on tape - Galaxy clearly beats him in both fights - The only big surprise out of the first fight wasn't that Galaxy didn't really win....it was that Matsumura went the distance!
But in no way, shape or form did Matsumura win their first fight -
Posted: 14 Aug 2005, 11:33
by meade95
I'll tell you who did look tough (but his career ended early) was the Fly Wt Champion Phichit Singbangprachn (his brother is the top rated Jr. Fly Wt phichit Siriwat) -
He won the IBF Fly Wt Title by Ko'ing Blanco in the 3rd round - Defended several times (beating Will Grisby via very close maj. dec) -
But he had very good power and size for a fly wt - Built like a brick sh*t house -
Re: My Top 10 Asian Fighters Ever
Posted: 14 Aug 2005, 15:14
by pound per pound
joonie73 wrote:A nice forum you guys have here; as someone who grew up in Asia, as well as watched probably several thousand Asian fights (including key fights of virtually every big name Asian fighter in the last 30 or so years), I think I can contribute something here.
Here's my top 10 Asian fighters ever:
1. Fighting Harada (legitimately beat Jofre twice; should have been the only fighter to ever win flyweight, bantamweight & featherweight titles had it not been for the infamous robbery against Famechon, a fight I scored 148-136)
2. Jung-Koo Chang (the best pure talent to ever come out of Asia; a boxing prodigy & genius who could have accomplished even more had he not wasted his career away with booze and women; still, he was almost untouchable in his prime, thoroughly dominating some of the greatest junior flyweights & flyweights of the last two decades in Zapata, Chitalada & Torres)
3. Pancho Villa (beat Wilde, the greatest flyweight ever; but the rest of his record is spotty)
4. Masao Ohba (often compared to Sanchez because of his untimely death at 23; some in Japan think he would have been better than Harada had he lieved)
5. Gabriel Elorde (beat Saddler & stretched Carlos Ortiz to the max)
6. Chan-Hee Park (similar to Chang in terms of wasting away his vast talent in booze & women; still beat the still-great Canto & obliterated Guty Espadas; textbook boxing skills & phenomenal speed)
7. Sung-Kil Moon (maybe the biggest puncher to ever come out of Asia, knocknamed "hands of stone"; regularly knocked out welterweights in sparring)
8. Jiro Watanabe (talented-wise perhaps the greatest junior bantamweight among the trio of Watanabe, Moon & Galaxy, but his ducking of Galaxy makes you wonder what could have been?)
9. Pone Kingpetch (vastly over-rated flyweight who benefited from facing an aging Perez & two scandalous gifts against Harada & Ebihara in the return bouts [after he was starched in the 1st bouts, in the case of v. Ebihara, literally in the 1st])
10. Kaosai Galaxy (the most over-rated Asian fighter of all-time, fought absolutely no one in the most talent-rich era of the divison & still had to struggle against the garbage at times)
Thank you Joonie73.
I would also call Harada the best as well. The main problem with boxing is Asia is not the boxing! It is horrible basied judging. When two fighters from other countries fight each other, the home town guy almost always takes the decision if he can win 4-5 of 12 rounds.