Khan v Salita confirmed

Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Alba »

whiteboy wrote:why newcastle? does FW have any north-east fighters
why not ?it dosent have to be about London and the south east
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by oliverfennell »

doctorboxing wrote:
chinny wrote:Kevin Mitchell v Ricky Burns is on the undercard apparently, according to one of Kevin's mates.
If this is true then this is far more exciting than the main event imo, a real 50-50 fight that I would love to see.
What exactly makes that a 50-50 fight? Mitchell should win comfortably.
opticald
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by opticald »

oliverfennell wrote:
doctorboxing wrote:
chinny wrote:Kevin Mitchell v Ricky Burns is on the undercard apparently, according to one of Kevin's mates.
If this is true then this is far more exciting than the main event imo, a real 50-50 fight that I would love to see.
What exactly makes that a 50-50 fight? Mitchell should win comfortably.

Yep. If I got evens on Mitchell I'd sell a kidney to get as much money on as I could. That would be the definition of "Free Money".
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by oliverfennell »

black panther wrote:[The rematch we've all been craving? Gunn-Maccarinelli II? :lol: :TU:
If Gunn beats 53-year-old Bash Ali for the IBU belt in Nigeria next month (seriously), that could be a road back!
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by whiteboy »

Alba wrote:
whiteboy wrote:why newcastle? does FW have any north-east fighters
why not ?it dosent have to be about London and the south east
not saying it does! just would of thought it did more tickets in manchester/birmingham/london, assuming mitchell and olympians, etc are on the undercard?
doctorboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by doctorboxing »

oliverfennell wrote:
doctorboxing wrote:
chinny wrote:Kevin Mitchell v Ricky Burns is on the undercard apparently, according to one of Kevin's mates.
If this is true then this is far more exciting than the main event imo, a real 50-50 fight that I would love to see.
What exactly makes that a 50-50 fight? Mitchell should win comfortably.
A year or two ago I would have agreed with you but since Carl Johanneson and then Estrada in summer 2008 he has only fought two opponents that lets be honest, didn't belong in the same ring as Kev. I think Burns has improved a lot in the same time and looked tremendous against Gomez, who whilst not being the Gomez of old would have presented a tough challenge to most super-feathers and had given Khan a hell of a scare not long ago.

My point is, we don't know how Mitchell is fighting as he hasn't had a decent fight for nearly a year and a half and we know that Ricky is improving as a fighter and will fancy his chances of the upset.

Any decent odd on Ricky and I will be taking them up.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by leforge »

Is this fight on sky box office? I not seen it advertised anywhere.
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by chinny »

leforge wrote:Is this fight on sky box office? I not seen it advertised anywhere.
sky seem to have a policy of only actively advertising one PPV at a time ie David v Goliath
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Chambers2 »

A few of the Current Scene posters have been saying that Salita has no power at all, which obv means he's tailor-made for Our Amir. What happened to Maidana, I thought he was going to get the mandatory spot, that would have been a far more interesting/risky fight for AK
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by alexpaterson »

chinny wrote:Kevin Mitchell v Ricky Burns is on the undercard apparently, according to one of Kevin's mates.
Here's hoping that would be a very intresting fight I think Mitchell will be too relentless for him and KO Burns in the mid rounds through aggression but Burns may give him problems early on
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by leforge »

Apart from Burn v Mitchell, and Clverly euro title fight if he wins, anyone else likely to be on bill to make it worth going to?
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

Chambers2 wrote:A few of the Current Scene posters have been saying that Salita has no power at all, which obv means he's tailor-made for Our Amir. What happened to Maidana, I thought he was going to get the mandatory spot, that would have been a far more interesting/risky fight for AK
salita has been the mandatory for a while now.

maidana won an interim title and should get next shot.

be interesting to see what the wba do on that one.

especially given the fact khan is fighting a mandatory in his 1st defence.

knowing them they'll give him a freebie next. :roll:
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Spud »

I might buy a ticket under an assumed name of course so "Boxing Tw*t" doesnt get his heavies to fill me in!!!

Yep I am going to buy one of them rare tickets.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by oliverfennell »

Spud wrote:I might buy a ticket under an assumed name of course so "Boxing Tw*t" doesnt get his heavies to fill me in!!!
You'd better wear a wig as well, then.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2036
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by GlobalBox »

Chambers2 wrote:A few of the Current Scene posters have been saying that Salita has no power at all, which obv means he's tailor-made for Our Amir. What happened to Maidana, I thought he was going to get the mandatory spot, that would have been a far more interesting/risky fight for AK
His power is not as bad as everyone is saying, he would not be far behind Kotenlik or possibly even level in terms of power, and whilst he was not a big puncher, there were plenty on here that said that would be enough to dent Khan's chin if he hit him.

None of the above has changed, if Amir is caught cleanly enough 2 or 3 times on the chin there is every chance the fight is turned on its head.

Do I think it will happen, the answer is no, Salita is too easy to hit with the right hand and at some stage I think Khan will land a couple that will wobble him and then finish him.

The interesting bit for me is if you watch Salita enough times whilst he has many limitations, he can pick a shot well and is very accurate when he gets going, whilst I think Khan is a good favourite for this, it ain't the definite gimmee some are saying.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Chambers2 »

GLOBALBOX wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:A few of the Current Scene posters have been saying that Salita has no power at all, which obv means he's tailor-made for Our Amir. What happened to Maidana, I thought he was going to get the mandatory spot, that would have been a far more interesting/risky fight for AK
His power is not as bad as everyone is saying, he would not be far behind Kotenlik or possibly even level in terms of power, and whilst he was not a big puncher, there were plenty on here that said that would be enough to dent Khan's chin if he hit him.

None of the above has changed, if Amir is caught cleanly enough 2 or 3 times on the chin there is every chance the fight is turned on its head.

Do I think it will happen, the answer is no, Salita is too easy to hit with the right hand and at some stage I think Khan will land a couple that will wobble him and then finish him.

The interesting bit for me is if you watch Salita enough times whilst he has many limitations, he can pick a shot well and is very accurate when he gets going, whilst I think Khan is a good favourite for this, it ain't the definite gimmee some are saying.
Cheers for the info
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Alba »

simpson v bell is a goer for this ,for the commonwealth .
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by teddy007 »

Alba wrote:simpson v bell is a goer for this ,for the commonwealth .
Steven Bell? If so the guy has done f*ck all to deserve a shot at a title and has been beaten in every meaningfull fight he has had as a pro.
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Alba »

teddy007 wrote:
Alba wrote:simpson v bell is a goer for this ,for the commonwealth .
Steven Bell? If so the guy has done f*ck all to deserve a shot at a title and has been beaten in every meaningfull fight he has had as a pro.
also heard that brook/jennings is now goign to be slotted on this undercard. :OhYes:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by leforge »

This bill looks very poor at the moment. Prescott v Mitchell. Who else is on this bill? If this is ppv it looks very weak cant see it selling more than 10,000!
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Khan v Salita confirmed

Post by Alba »

leforge wrote:This bill looks very poor at the moment. Prescott v Mitchell. Who else is on this bill? If this is ppv it looks very weak cant see it selling more than 10,000!

im just amking a guess here ,i think once the haye PPV is out of the way they will announce a full undercard,so they can push the PPV for this mate ...its the only logical reason i think .
Post Reply