BoxRec

to be fair i think it was chiv that originally wanted the fight , it made sense , ticket sales wise etc etc as woodhouse played for mansfield and chiv was from mansfeild , both with similar records and weight . but woodhouse took exception and started being an idiot about it .

cheers Damian

rhino222 wrote:its all about opinion mate, and time will tell.

Yeah mate of course...

Counter-puncher wrote:woodhouse is- what? 6 foot and natural weight over 11stone

Is he that big, on here it says he is 5"8"???

Londonirish wrote:

rhino222 wrote:its all about opinion mate, and time will tell.

Yeah mate of course...

Counter-puncher wrote:woodhouse is- what? 6 foot and natural weight over 11stone

Is he that big, on here it says he is 5"8"???

ive stood next to curtis and he is about 5ft9

oh okay my mistake thanks rhino , i definitely read once that woodhouse was much bigger than 5'9

im always surprised how small these fellas are when you are next to them, i know they are all muscle and upper body, compared to us burger munchers...

the most amazed i have ever been was at the mccracken v keith holmes fight. holmes, although obviously well developed across the lats and shoulders and arms. had legs that were holding the same amount of muscle as jeremy beadles bad arm...

the likes of naz had thick legs for his size and weight.

speak for yourself 'burgermuncher' i nearly spat out my granola lowfat powerbar when you called me that :) I'm 6'2 most people seem pretty short but like you say a lot of boxers 'look' bigger/heavier in muscular sense than they 'really' are, Froch i would have bet was 13odd stone first time i saw him....