Page 3 of 3
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 09:23
by n1ebf
Asterix wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Yet another, eh?
it would appear that way

Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 09:49
by Hagler2002
Asterix wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Yet another, eh?
Yeah and if I got everyone right I'd be a millionaire, you must have a 100% strike rate do you
Hagler2002 wrote:I just don't see this one going the distance, 5/6 on Khan by stoppage seems a good price, after watching a bit of Salita he isn't the hardest fighter to hit
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 09:50
by Hagler2002
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Asterix wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
Yet another, eh?
it would appear that way

And how did your selections go at the weekend NobEndBoxingFan?
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 11:44
by n1ebf
i predicted Enz would get beat (admittedly i didn't even look at the oppos name or record)
i predicted Degale would get booed but I don't know.
I predicted Arthur would give Wright hell and take him on points
I predicted Salita would provide young Mr Khan with a stern test (but not beat him).
And I predicted John Simpson would stop Mr Bell in 6 or 7, forget which round it was stopped in, but I was one round out.
..............I know what you're all going to say........you were only ONE round out on the Simpson victory, North East, what a fcking legend
I thank you all
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 11:45
by Adamj1987
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:i predicted Enz would get beat (admittedly i didn't even look at the oppos name or record)
i predicted Degale would get booed but I don't know.
I predicted Arthur would give Wright hell and take him on points
I predicted Salita would provide young Mr Khan with a stern test (but not beat him).
And I predicted John Simpson would stop Mr Bell in 6 or 7, forget which round it was stopped in, but I was one round out.
..............I know what you're all going to say........you were only ONE round out on the Simpson victory, North East, what a fcking legend
I thank you all
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 11:52
by n1ebf
Sarcasm Adam, I was being sarcastic..........has sarcasm reached Preston yet?......you're in for a treat.
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 11:55
by leforge
Very good peformance! Like to see him fighting again about March.
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 11:55
by n1ebf
Adam, do me a favour....put that picture up of you and Tyson Fury again now, go on mate do it for me. He's 5 times better than any hevyweight in the world right now you know....and Foreman, what with his pole-axing jab and detonating right. Well he'd have beat him
easy.......(Pops Fury, 2009)
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 13:06
by handles
Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
well that statement makes mitchell above that level now

Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 07 Dec 2009, 16:22
by Hagler2002
handles wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
well that statement makes mitchell above that level now

Oh here's another fornicating expert with a 100% strike rate on his selections

Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 08 Dec 2009, 20:18
by handles
Hagler2002 wrote:handles wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Prescott will hammer him! Mitchell's best win is against Carl Johanneson and look how hard that was.
Prescott is several levels above that.
well that statement makes mitchell above that level now

Oh here's another effing expert with a 100% strike rate on his selections

aint my fault im a better predictor than you mate
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 08 Dec 2009, 20:25
by Des1
Handles ...stop upsetting people and making them sulk by proving em wrong this time of night!

Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 08 Dec 2009, 20:32
by Des1
christymetcalfe1 wrote:mitchell has absolutely no chance, what a bad matchup for him imo, it seems ridiculous that everyones saying that prescott cant box because of one bad outing mitchell rarely outbox's average opponents prescott will jab his head off and knock him out reletively early-his skills underrated
Well....Mitchell clearly OUTBOXED Prescott, do you think you under rated Mitchells skills?

Re: Mitchell- The time you have to beat is 54 secs
Posted: 09 Dec 2009, 20:59
by handles
Des1 wrote:christymetcalfe1 wrote:mitchell has absolutely no chance, what a bad matchup for him imo, it seems ridiculous that everyones saying that prescott cant box because of one bad outing mitchell rarely outbox's average opponents prescott will jab his head off and knock him out reletively early-his skills underrated
Well....Mitchell clearly OUTBOXED Prescott, do you think you under rated Mitchells skills?

I didnt
