Page 3 of 6
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:05
by DG.
CORRUPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CORRUPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dave Parrish gave to Mac by 5 points!
bRITISH BOXING AT ITS BEST - CORRUPTION, IMO - ALLEGEDLY - IMO MY OPINION.
CANT WAIT FOR THE NEXT UFC!!!
NAPA RIPPED OFF AGAIN!!
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:06
by whicker
jonp wrote:
Altho sometimes i realy think the commentry team kind lean towards one guy forget the other
Definatly.
It would be interesting to let people who haven't seen the fight (or know the result) watch a few of these, without commentators scorecards or commentary, and see how they get it.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:06
by Horse
Do people still think three judges are better at scoring a fight than a referee?
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:06
by jonp
I dont think it was a robbery as it said on tv opinion was divided ringside.Think the commentry sometimes pulls people away from actualy judging a fight.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:07
by leforge
Mcdonnell did well but did not win imo Napa won by 2 rounds at least. The judging in British fights is poor, last week Norton should not have won either.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:08
by leforge
I hope Napa gets a rematch or Davis v Hall winner gets him. Davis will beat him imo.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:08
by gkt999
How can Dave Paris still be reff'in and judgeing after the last 6mnths ?
Has he got special glasses to watch these fights ? or is there some other reason ???
Ahh was he watching the Ama fights advertised here on his phone ?
the best about it is I wantted McDonnell to win and had cash on him but just didn't think he done enough, last 3-4 rnds he done well but other than that he didn't do enough to get a 10-9 rnd.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:08
by jonp
neil hibbert wrote:wow i had napa by a few jeez napa was robbed, wondered why sky was talking mcdonnell up so much aswell hmmmmmmm

Can see what yr saying Neil but if you had it by a few and a lot of those rounds were very close it only takes one round that you had for napa to go to mcdonnell to make it a draw hardly a robbery if yr opinion i only one round diffrent to the judges.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:09
by DG.
Rematch!
Napa outclassed him!
DP NEEDS TO GO - IS HE BENMT OR WHAT?
IJL ALWAYS GOES AGAINST NAPA
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:10
by leforge
I am sorry that was bollocks scoring. Nicky Piper full of shit a pudendum imo.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:10
by MrBoxingUK2
shocking scoring. napa was robbed. he won by atleast 3 on my card. dave paris needs sacking! gotta feel for napa tho
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:11
by leforge
Nicky Piper is a first rate pudendum he no nothing imo. Spencer got it right!
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:11
by neil hibbert
i watched it on mute aswell as i cant stand skys bullshit commentary, really cant believe they gave that to mcdonnell
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:11
by MrBoxingUK2
leforge wrote:I am sorry that was bollocks scoring. Nicky Piper full of poop a pudendum imo.
does nicky piper ever get the scoring right?? the guy is an idiot
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:12
by jonp
I think Mcdonnell might win the rematch better Mcdonnell would know to start his finish stronger and at 31 these kind of fights will take more out of napa than Mcdonnell
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:14
by Ally-M1
What on earth was Dave Parris watching? I still can't believe it!
Horrific effort from two of the judges - Napa won that fight.
Nicky Piper is rubbish too!
I still can't stop being mad - even though we're used to this lousy scoring.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:16
by leforge
I called Nicky Piper a C U Next Tuseday by the way!
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:17
by neil hibbert
leforge wrote:I hope Napa gets a rematch or Davis v Hall winner gets him. Davis will beat him imo.

tough fight for gary with hall though mate im more worrie about this 1 than when i was for the napa 1
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:18
by whicker
leforge wrote:I called Nicky Piper a C U Next Tuseday by the way!
Yeah, we know what the p word mean!
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:20
by leforge
But if Gary wins with frank and Steve that get him a title shot. Mcdonell promotor has no tv deal. I thought it would be a Napa v Davis rematch for Euro title later in the year.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:25
by neil hibbert
leforge wrote:But if Gary wins with frank and Steve that get him a title shot. Mcdonell promotor has no tv deal. I thought it would be a Napa v Davis rematch for Euro title later in the year.
thats what i was hoping for 2 b fair mate hopefully gary beats hall then can get in with mcdonnell
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:27
by leforge
Hall be a harder fight than Mcdonnell.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:37
by neil hibbert
leforge wrote:Hall be a harder fight than Mcdonnell.
ano mate deffo, should have been a rematch between napa and davies 2 b honest thats what was meant 2 b but oh well, gonna be a cracking fight on the 19th though mate cant wait
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:44
by leforge
I hope Napa gets a chance again.
Re: Napa v McDonnell
Posted: 22 Jan 2010, 19:46
by neil hibbert
if he was a bit taller hed be world champ no doubt about it