I agree. If British fighters were listed in a list with Americans it would be very patronising to call it the ''American P4P top #'moorser wrote:why not it is a british and irish list
if there was britsh and french fighters in a list would you call it a british list ??? or a british and french list ??
British Top 30 P4P February 2010
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2010
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2010
Why would someone make a British and French list? French fighters can't fight for the British title, but some Irish fighters can.moorser wrote:why not it is a british and irish list
if there was britsh and french fighters in a list would you call it a british list ??? or a british and french list ??
I used to include Irish fighters that were going down the British/Commonwealth title route and exclude Irish fighters that were not. I decided to make all Irish fighters eligible to enter the list, so I didn't have to decide which Irish fighters should be included in the British rankings or not.
I have had this sort of discussion with Irish posters in the past. They seemed to be placated when I added "(Irish)" next to the Irish fighters names.
I like the name of my monthly list as it is. I see no need to change it.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2010
I wouldn't care, especially if they put "(British)" next to the names of the British fighters.JDC wrote:I agree. If British fighters were listed in a list with Americans it would be very patronising to call it the ''American P4P top #'