BoxRec

BoxBuzz wrote:

ben k wrote:Mr Sam Langford again calls out any fighter in the top 10. He will except any fighter at any venue.

If no one excepts (as Usual) He will fight Tiger Tim Bell.

Mr Harry Matthews is upset about his recent loss to Eric Lucas. He would like a rematch.

Both these fights will be at Madison Square Garden.

Benn, How about Conn Vs Matthews? You name any venue as long as it's in Mexico. I think that would be neutral enough. Think we'd sell any tickets? If not Mexico make it Russia.

We accept this fight, As long as Mr Rosenbloom is willing to except a challenge from Mr Langford next week, should he win the Title.

Otherwise Mr Matthews has some unfinished business with Lucas

ben k wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:

ben k wrote:Mr Sam Langford again calls out any fighter in the top 10. He will except any fighter at any venue.

If no one excepts (as Usual) He will fight Tiger Tim Bell.

Mr Harry Matthews is upset about his recent loss to Eric Lucas. He would like a rematch.

Both these fights will be at Madison Square Garden.

Benn, How about Conn Vs Matthews? You name any venue as long as it's in Mexico. I think that would be neutral enough. Think we'd sell any tickets? If not Mexico make it Russia.

We accept this fight, As long as Mr Rosenbloom is willing to except a challenge from Mr Langford next week, should he win the Title.

Otherwise Mr Matthews has some unfinished business with Lucas

Dear Mr BenK

GoldenBuzzPromotions does not abide by "quid pro quos" or any double dealing, high falootin' back stabbery or larcenous back room deals. We are a high quality, value driven, organization that knows only simple common sense and fair mindedness. Much like your own organization.

As fate would have it week 19 is "Corrupt Commish Cumpulsory Week". A week in which no one can call their own shots due to rampant political power gone mad. As a result we are unable to make such a committment. We of course wish we could somehow work something out with you on this matter.

If we should hold such cards in the following week, we would of course consider Sam's eligiblity, viability, amiability as well as review his past record, taking into consideration the public's desire for such a face off. He'll need to submit a recent physical and fill out all the championship challenger event paperwork.

Would that suffice?

Billy Conn feels that if he can't quite beat your "A" fighter, he can certainly punish and pummel your "B" fighter in a way that will leave a distinct impression.
However in the spirit of full disclosure, this will leave your "B" fighter with and addtional "L" on his record as well as a likely "KO".

We look forward to your final decision in this matter.

armageto wrote:E. Charles is hoping for a title shot at Fox


If not, he calls out M. Rosenbloom, R. Jones


CPU backup is A. Hanshaw


Bivens is hoping for a title shot as well against Fox


If not, he calls out C. Eubank and M. Rosenbloom


CPU backup is S. Drews

Just wanted to bump this up

ben k wrote: We accept this fight, As long as Mr Rosenbloom is willing to except a challenge from Mr Langford next week, should he win the Title.

Now that's what I call "boxing politics".

There are lads on here who could give Don King a run for his money (whats left of it).

Spinks agres to the Calzaghe fight.

Greb will take on Virgil Hill

Both fights at the Black Horse.

If Michael Spinks a former HW champ is allowed here, shouldnt' Corey also be allowed to participate? He's not a LHW either.

Crease wrote:Carl "The Cobra" Froch would like to fight Nathan Cleverley (CPU)
at The Ulster Hall, Belfast.

The Commish must be consulted before are other fighter can be elected for a fight.

What's this? Froch ducking Eubank!

BHOP will settle the score with Lacey!

Smally Big Plums wrote:BHOP will settle the score with Lacey!

How about Greb V Hopkins?

Smally Big Plums wrote:

Crease wrote:Carl "The Cobra" Froch would like to fight Nathan Cleverley (CPU)
at The Ulster Hall, Belfast.

The Commish must be consulted before are other fighter can be elected for a fight.

What's this? Froch ducking Eubank!

How about Tarver vs Froch

Smally Big Plums wrote:

Crease wrote:Carl "The Cobra" Froch would like to fight Nathan Cleverley (CPU)
at The Ulster Hall, Belfast.

The Commish must be consulted before are other fighter can be elected for a fight.

What's this? Froch ducking Eubank!

Wasn't Froch calling out Eubank only yesterday?

Smally Big Plums wrote: What's this? Froch ducking Eubank!

The 3 Cs would like to reply to this comment by simply saying:
"Froch wanted to fight Eubank... There was no answer.
Later, Eubank didn't want Froch... They tried to set Carl up with Hopkins.
THEN, after the Eubank vs Froch was nearly signed... Venues couldn't be agreed.

You had your chance, Smally.

But I will not rule out a Froch vs Eubank fight for the near future.

The End wrote: How about Tarver vs Froch

Again, Froch has Tarver in his sights. Sadaly this is not the time for this particular fight to happen.

Deno1986 wrote: Wasn't Froch calling out Eubank only yesterday?

He was and he did... But a fight venue couldn't be agreed.

Froch will fight Cleverley. 'nuff said.

You're talkin' smack to a veteran son. Don't make him go all Santa Clause on your pitiful self.

I'm aint talking smack... I'm telling the truth.
I wanted Froch to fight Eubank, but smally concluded that the fight MUST be a Liverpool..

Crease wrote:Froch is ducking Tarver

Understood.

The End wrote:

Crease wrote:Froch is ducking Tarver

Understood.

I never said that.

Why don't you a fight a top contender instead of trying to bully the new guys into big fights, too quick, too soon.

And it's laughable that you are manipulating my words...
What does that say about you?

Crease wrote:

The End wrote:

Crease wrote:Froch is ducking Tarver

Understood.

I never said that.

Why don't you a fight a top contender instead of trying to bully the new guys into big fights, too quick, too soon.

And it's laughable that you are manipulating my words...
What does that say about you?

I didn't manipulate your words, I simplified them and by the way Tarver is a new guy who is simply trying to fight a fellow new guy .

Jack Delaney challenges Antonio Tarver

Neutral Venue: Earls Court, London

The End wrote: I didn't manipulate your words, I simplified them...because I am a NOOB

I agree whole-heartedly.

Deno1986 wrote:Jack Delaney challenges Antonio Tarver

Neutral Venue: Earls Court, London

Sure crease,
sign it

The End wrote:

Deno1986 wrote:Jack Delaney challenges Antonio Tarver

Neutral Venue: Earls Court, London

Sure crease,
sign it

I think you mean Deno... It's his fighter you will be fighting.

When you say "sign it" - does this mean I just have to agree to a fight, or do I have to mail the commish with the fights that I want?

Just agree to it

Jesus, even adam didn't have this much trouble arranging a fight!!!

Commish,

Jack Delaney will fight Antonio Tarver at Earls Court, London

kevo wrote:Just agree to it

Cheers Kev.