BoxRec

I can see what people are saying about Collazo but i really think Special Kel needs to be stepping up by the end of the year - N'dou is a good shout but i think after a fight like that he needs to be looking at world class seasoned fighter to make his name with.

Khan v Barrera worked well after all.

I think there is a world of difference between barrera and Collazo. Yes, barrera is p4p a better fighter and HOF er , however, Collazo is still in his prime and a natural (big) welterweight. barrera was 2 or 3 weights above his best (depending when you define his best) and quite frankly way way over the hill.

...

sugar sweet wrote:brook vs pryce. iv been boxing out of my weight limit for years,time to move back to welterweight,got new trainer now in gary lockett,and even tho i didnt win the 3 round format prizefighter,i think people will now see me at my best over 12rounds,so brook or jennings lets do it.

Good shout bradley, don't see why this couldn't be made and would certainly be a good test for Kel!

trained by gary locket - interesting. What does he birng to the table bradley?

Wales wrote:trained by gary locket - interesting. What does he birng to the table bradley?

..

@sugar sweet

I dont wish to be known as a poster who lacks respect but it has to be said. Kell would marmalise you in my opinion. I think there are questions that brook needs to answer but I dont think you'd provide them

Bradley - you looked a fantastic prospect when you turned pro., but be reasonable - you haven't made welter for 4 and a half years.
Maybe if you reversed the losses to Jennings and Hall you might force your way into the reckoning.

Pugilist-specialist wrote:Bradley - you looked a fantastic prospect when you turned pro., but be reasonable - you haven't made welter for 4 and a half years.
Maybe if you reversed the losses to Jennings and Hall you might force your way into the reckoning.

×2 no offence bradley but you'd be dead @ the weight mate! kell's the real deal + he's faster & hit's harder than hall! good luck with the rest of your career anyway brad

antony wrote:

Pugilist-specialist wrote:Bradley - you looked a fantastic prospect when you turned pro., but be reasonable - you haven't made welter for 4 and a half years.
Maybe if you reversed the losses to Jennings and Hall you might force your way into the reckoning.

×2 no offence bradley but you'd be dead @ the weight mate! kell's the real deal + he's faster & hit's harder than hall! good luck with the rest of your career anyway brad

i will make welter easy enough.a week before i boxed ossie duran for light-middle title i was suppose to of been boxing david barnes at light-welter,i dont think i had much say in the fight being changed but took it anyway,thats when i stepped up from welter.i won title and defended many times,reason being iv not made welterweight for 4yrs.but truth is im not a light-middle.dont get me wrong if small fight was a option id take it but for now i plan on reinventing myself at welter,no disrespect to any of top 5 ranked in britain but i think il beat any of them.people will have there views,favorites,etc.but im looking forward to getting down to welter and getting in the mix.

sugar sweet wrote:

antony wrote:

Pugilist-specialist wrote:Bradley - you looked a fantastic prospect when you turned pro., but be reasonable - you haven't made welter for 4 and a half years.
Maybe if you reversed the losses to Jennings and Hall you might force your way into the reckoning.

×2 no offence bradley but you'd be dead @ the weight mate! kell's the real deal + he's faster & hit's harder than hall! good luck with the rest of your career anyway brad

i will make welter easy enough.a week before i boxed ossie duran for light-middle title i was suppose to of been boxing david barnes at light-welter,i dont think i had much say in the fight being changed but took it anyway,thats when i stepped up from welter.i won title and defended many times,reason being iv not made welterweight for 4yrs.but truth is im not a light-middle.dont get me wrong if small fight was a option id take it but for now i plan on reinventing myself at welter,no disrespect to any of top 5 ranked in britain but i think il beat any of them.people will have there views,favorites,etc.but im looking forward to getting down to welter and getting in the mix.

i like you mate , but i think lately your coming across as more confident in your own ability than maybe you should be , i know confidence is a key attribute for any boxer though . as an example before your first round prizefighter bout , you said its you or him to win it , if i get through this its no prob for the rest of the night , but i knew youd both take it out of each other , i expected you to win , which you did but then i knew youd find the semi tough , due to the effort youd had to make first time , whereas you didnt seem to think prince arron was any sort of threat , now you say youd do any of the top 5 british welterweights , mate no offence but i think brook would do you in 3 , and i see you vs michael jennings or john o donnell as fights that could go either way .
but as i said i like you as a fighter and id like to see you do well , but i of course wouldnt want to see you in with brook as im certain youd be knocked out.

Kel Brook would take Bradly Pryce and any other British fighter apart - I have always rated him - although would like to see how he reacts under pressure because when he does step onto the world stage he will need to have bags of heart to go with his massive set of skills.

IMO a very special boxer.

Randall Bailey