BoxRec

[quote="liamsmith88"]scott quigg is a very nice lad, an doin very well 4 himself in the pro game as i no he only had a few amature fights(10 or 11). but if people r talkin about him as a featherweight, hes not in stephens league. he,s a good, strong super-bantam. an wen the time comes, stephen will win domestic titles an go further on, alot further, hes a very strong feather!![/quote]
Big deal quig didnt have much of a amatuer background, its the pro game not amateurs, he has already beaten a european title challenger which is better than anything stephen smith has done, and if he did move up to feather smith vs quigg is a 50/50 fight, would make for a great english title battle.

He just pointed out how well he has done considering his inexperience having had so few fights in the ams. Why go straight on the defensive??? And as for myself, i'll be involved in title fights VERY SOON, then i can prove a few points. If Quigg moves to feather, then even better

Cotto16 wrote:

liamsmith88 wrote:scott quigg is a very nice lad, an doin very well 4 himself in the pro game as i no he only had a few amature fights(10 or 11). but if people r talkin about him as a featherweight, hes not in stephens league. he,s a good, strong super-bantam. an wen the time comes, stephen will win domestic titles an go further on, alot further, hes a very strong feather!!

Big deal quig didnt have much of a amatuer background, its the pro game not amateurs, he has already beaten a european title challenger which is better than anything stephen smith has done, and if he did move up to feather smith vs quigg is a 50/50 fight, would make for a great english title battle.

You completely missed the kids point, and now look like a tool.

[quote="jBacca"][quote="Cotto16"][quote="liamsmith88"]scott quigg is a very nice lad, an doin very well 4 himself in the pro game as i no he only had a few amature fights(10 or 11). but if people r talkin about him as a featherweight, hes not in stephens league. he,s a good, strong super-bantam. an wen the time comes, stephen will win domestic titles an go further on, alot further, hes a very strong feather!![/quote]
Big deal quig didnt have much of a amatuer background, its the pro game not amateurs, he has already beaten a european title challenger which is better than anything stephen smith has done, and if he did move up to feather smith vs quigg is a 50/50 fight, would make for a great english title battle.[/quote]

You completely missed the kids point, and now look like a tool.[/quote]
i missed the point? he said quigg was not in smiths league, which is the biggest load of rubbish av heard

Liam praised the kid on doing well in the pros despite never having much of an amateur background, to which you replied:

Cotto16 wrote: Big deal quig didnt have much of a amatuer background, its the pro game not amateurs, he has already beaten a european title challenger which is better than anything stephen smith has done

Comprende?

Cotto16 wrote:

jBacca wrote:

Cotto16 wrote: Big deal quig didnt have much of a amatuer background, its the pro game not amateurs, he has already beaten a european title challenger which is better than anything stephen smith has done, and if he did move up to feather smith vs quigg is a 50/50 fight, would make for a great english title battle.

You completely missed the kids point, and now look like a tool.

i missed the point? he said quigg was not in smiths league, which is the biggest load of rubbish av heard

Please learn how to quote properly, it's doing my head in.

The Simpson-Lindsay fight is a fight that needs to happen. Respect to Arthur for giving a good account of himself but Simpson has been boxing in championship class for some time now and would provide a much sterner test IMO.