Page 3 of 3

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 03 Apr 2010, 15:45
by hurlock
Bomber 1 wrote:
hurlock wrote:maybe he got wobbled by him in sparring meaning he could have a dodgy chin :DDD :DDD
He sparked me, I can't remember eff all... :wink:

No on a serious note, Paul can really punch guys.. :TU:

what... so if you was in the shower & had some foam burst on your bonce with it in your eye's & smigga walks in & see's a prime oppurtunity to chin you as he secretly allways has done :DDD do you think you'd be sleepin looking like a snowball or would you be able to go ow who was that :!: im gonna foookin kill ya :!: & unleash the humdinger?

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 03 Apr 2010, 15:48
by Jeff Thomas
mickey1975 wrote:
Jeff Thomas wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Really respected guys like Billy Graham and Buddy McGirt always talk about his power.Im not doubting them,but have lost a few quid when backing him to win inside the distance
Just because fights go the distance doesn't mean someone can't punch, dean Phillips, Geoff McReesh, Paul Welsey, minisculee stoppage percentages but big bangers... look at Jon Thaxton. Paul is strong as eff you can see it if you look closely on Sky. Thats why opponents are prob so keen to hold.
I respect every pro,im just saying,the real bangers,like Graham and McGirt claim Smith to be,would be stopping the lads he's going the distance with.I rate Paul,i just think with the way his trainers go on,we should be getting some highlight reel clips
I'm not saying your disrespecting anyone mate, non-puncher- puncher they all get my respect... Just that he can hit... its clear to see. :TU:

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 03 Apr 2010, 23:22
by terrdilk
You now wot I now Paul can punch an I respect that an would never question thatan o think I needto pit this t bed me an tony bellew is never going to happen not throw me turning away from the fight well in a sancemaybe I'm a full blown supermiddle an if I'm being buatily honset tony is jjust to big for me an for me to say that has took alot but hopfully I can fight groves next then Paul smith

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 05:08
by hoop
Carl are you not meant to be fighting Kenny Anderson in an eliminater for the British?, Also I dont think Paul David deserves a shot at anything he pulled out at late notice twice against Anderson in eliminaters he should be put to the back of the line.

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 05:39
by steevyp
this shouldnt even be an option for smith. dilks is good, but hes way behind smith and smith should be looking forward rather than looking to bring these people up with him.

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 05:43
by glahn
Smith should only really be looking at Magee. Neither of them really has any other meaningful fights on the agenda and it could pull a decent crowd in Liverpool or Belfast. The winner could then maybe look for a fight with Bute.

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 05:46
by hoop
Unless Smith is made maditory for the Euro I cant see the Magee fight coming off due to the problems with Warren/Hatton, I think Magee would beat Smith by wide points based on each of there last performace.

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 07:54
by leeharding
Smigga wrote:Dilks is doing exactly what Dodson did, mouthing off to get a shot at a title.
I don't rate him, never did as an amateur when we all boxed together in uzbekistan, carl showed no heart and belief in himself yet again.
At super middle he has had one fight and regardless of what we think, on paper he lost. Now he fights a kid 5-4 and thinks that warrants a british title fight.
Go and fight Quigley, or Dodson..... In my opinion BOTH beat Dilks.
smigga totally agree lad i think it wouldnt go past 2rounds 2 be onnest no disrespect to you carl but i think your biting more than you can chew but if it gets you a pay day y not and smigga when you all boxed in uzbekistan r gary boxed aswell didnt he and ste birch and martin murrey didnt you all get tea pots and rugs as prizes

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 08:23
by jBacca
terrdilk wrote:You now wot I now Paul can punch an I respect that an would never question thatan o think I needto pit this t bed me an tony bellew is never going to happen not throw me turning away from the fight well in a sancemaybe I'm a full blown supermiddle an if I'm being buatily honset tony is jjust to big for me an for me to say that has took alot but hopfully I can fight groves next then Paul smith
:TU:

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 08:42
by Captain Hook
This thread is getting exciting :)

Smith and Magee will be a good one, and the run he's on a I fancy Smith to pinch that on points. Magee is no mug though, and to say he's shot is wide of the mark.

Bit of banter between the Liverpool lads but all three - Smith, Bellew and Dilks - are good pros, all have talent but they are in totally different places IMO.

Dilks is behind Paul by 3/4 fights and Bomber is too big for both of them and has his eyes on light-heavy glory......

Good luck to them all.....

By the way if it was a spelling/grammar contest Smigga would wipe the floor with both of them :TU:

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 04 Apr 2010, 08:57
by hurlock
i fancy smith to beat magee but he could get cut up & tired out as magee uses the head pushes it down aswell as hit & hold :!:
smith cant afford to load up & wait for this to happen v magee like he did v dodson

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 05 Apr 2010, 03:54
by gmanji
Please... What kind of thread is this! Dilks is a very average fighter. Smith would beat him to a pulp.

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 05 Apr 2010, 07:19
by Bomber 1
terrdilk wrote:You now wot I now Paul can punch an I respect that an would never question thatan o think I needto pit this t bed me an tony bellew is never going to happen not throw me turning away from the fight well in a sancemaybe I'm a full blown supermiddle an if I'm being buatily honset tony is jjust to big for me an for me to say that has took alot but hopfully I can fight groves next then Paul smith

I respect that and wish other people in my division would be more honest, You'll hear no more about fighting me from my end!!

Groves is beatable BUT if he fights Paul next which I do doubt then he'll get exposed!! Paul has an awful lot of experience from every angle, From cuts,to contender to long fights to short fights to a hard fight and he's always found a way to win, Im not even gonna get on the Bendall fight cos I was on the first row for the whole fight and Paul won that fight, Quigley is one of the most underated boxers in the country and Dodson is the biggest supermiddle weight in the country and on both occasions Paul found a way to turn it all in his favour.. I think next stop for Paul is European or World title so all the talk of another derby is completely out of the question... :TU:

P.s good luck to you in the future..

Re: Paul Smith vs Carl Dilks! Who wins?

Posted: 05 Apr 2010, 10:52
by alexpaterson
Smith for me. I think his jab would keep Dilks at bay. Winning on points, could be a good one though