Light Heavyweight Statistics:

[armageto]

Sorry man, but you post has a lot of holes.

It's only you to seems to think so.
I have been commended by Kevo, Jbacca and Neri on this very thread. :)

Your logic for Hill over Charles is pretty pathetic.

I shall say this one more time, because your just not getting it.
Hill has achieved more on the big stage than what Charles had.

As for my losses, the whole point there is A LOT of these losses are close, down to the wire defeats.

"It don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile. Winning's winning."
- Dominic Toretto

Your thinking translates to how you actually would rank fighters in real life, which is suspect at best. You probably think anybody with a title is the best fighter in the division.

Well.... No.
Because in real life we get to watch the fighters performances and make our own judgements... So I don't rank fighters like this in real life...
Don't assume 'geto you are making an ass of yourself.

As for my fighters- they arrived halfway through the season... they only had half of a season to make an impact...
This was a massive disavantage to my fighters.

Not to mention the fact that it was my debut season, and I'm still learning the ropes...
And how to hustle numerous title shots for myself... Like Boxbuzz does.

Bad news, a few people already came on saying Charles was a top 10 fighter for the year. Sock even came on and said Charles was better than Dillon....and Dillon is HIS fighter!!!


You're not getting it, the WBU belt it for people outside of the top 15. So what if Hill held that belt? That just means he was outside of the top 15 when he fought for it and defended it against people outside of the top 15. Holding the WBU is achieving more.....ok guy......

So, it's better to lose a SD or get KO'd in one round? Do you even watch boxing? I've seen some of your posts about boxing outside this forum and I still stand by my statement.

Anyhow, you are just the "TML" of this section of the forum. You'll blow next year because your picks will be horrible.....

[armageto]

Harry Matthews deserves a mention, With his limited talent he managed to secure the WBU Title and hold it for longer than anyone else in the Sims. He has avioded no one.

I'm afraid that you are way wrong Ben K.
Here is a quick list of the best WBU title reigns:

Michael Spinks: Week 7 through to Week 15... 7 successful title defences.

Harry Matthews: Week 21 through to Week 26... 4 successful title defences

James Toney: Week 28 through to Week 33... 4 successful title defences.

Tommy Burns: Week 16 through to Week 20... 3 successful title defences

Philadelphia Jack O'Brien: Week 33 through to Week 37... 3 successful title defences.

SPINKS HAS HELD THE WBU TITLE WAY LONGER THAN ANYONE ELSE!

'Nuff said... I suggest you start doing your homework Ben K or you'll keep getting called.

In all fairness Spinks was allowed to defend his title against computer controlled opponents.

I would say Matthews and Toney are tied for most defenses.

Spinks only successfully defended against two human controlled opponents.

Crease talking out his ass yet again..........

[Crease]

Crease talking out his ass yet again..........

What a bullshitter you are.

Have you trouble counting? Spinks defended the title 7 times...
7 is more than 4.

Geez... Where does these characters come from.

[armageto]

Crease talking out his ass yet again..........

What a bullshitter you are.

Have you trouble counting? Spinks defended the title 7 times...
7 is more than 4.

Geez... Where does these characters come from.

It was already explained to you in Grimm's post.....


Anyhow, he really gives a f@ck about your Sim-opinion anyhow......