Page 3 of 4

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 04:40
by m1kee50
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:I'm actually starting to like Khan despite despising him in the first few years of his career. Threads like the recent one by Boxerbob only add to my liking of the fella.
I have the same sort of attitude now re Big Aud. He has been an irritant for ages but people who still don't give him any credit after Friday have got on my nerves.
Yeah I've even started to re-appreciate Mayweather lol... is that too much I wonder?

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 04:50
by Deno1986
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:I'm actually starting to like Khan despite despising him in the first few years of his career. Threads like the recent one by Boxerbob only add to my liking of the fella.
I have the same sort of attitude now re Big Aud. He has been an irritant for ages but people who still don't give him any credit after Friday have got on my nerves.
Interestingly enough, I always liked Audley for some strange, unexplained reason. Possibly just the comedy factor of some of his quotes. Fair play to him though, he is still in the game and still may pull of his promise of winning a world title of some sorts.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 05:13
by Lenny
Can I ask a question to those who said they hate Froch because of Gomez, if you're down the pub watching a fight of his and somebody down there asks you why you dislike Froch, would you tell them it's because he has a mate on an internet forum who gets on your nerves? Or would saying that kinda make you realise how pathetic that sounds?

I'm always amazed at how emotional some people get at what people on a forum might say.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 05:23
by banjo
Funnily enough I'd actually like Froch more if he livened up a bit and stopped being so damn serious, a bit of personality goes a long way when you're trying to promote a fight in a sport which is becoming more and more marginalised. I don't mind G0mez he gives us updates on Froch, yeah he gets a bit overexcited when it comes to Amir and Joe and his bias shows at times but never enough to make me hate a fighter, if I dislike a fighter it's usually down to the fighter himself although certain fans can irritate me.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 05:30
by forcefraser
I wouldn`t say that I dislike or like a boxer more or less due to the comments written on here.

One exception perhaps, I now really root for Enzo Mac, as the poor bloke has a seriously scary stalker in Flint Island.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 05:34
by REAL_DEAL
Enzo is a nice guy and i always want to see him win but it annoyed me when flint and reeso made him look bad. I always want to see Liverpool lose because alot of annoying people i work with are liverpool fans

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 05:35
by crusader
If someone is really obnoxious and over the top in their posts (ex:Audley is the best boxer on the planet you tits, Gonzales beat the shitt out of Ancliff you have to be blind to disagree), then I can develop a dislike of the poster making such stupid/harsh statements. Therefore I want the fighters they support to lose so the annoying poster is shut up and their over the top claims make them look like an idiot. Not fair to the fighter, but it can work that way.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 05:40
by Adamj1987
crusader wrote:If someone is really obnoxious and over the top in their posts (ex:Audley is the best boxer on the planet you tits, Gonzales beat the shitt out of Ancliff you have to be blind to disagree), then I can develop a dislike of the poster making such stupid/harsh statements. Therefore I want the fighters they support to lose so the annoying poster is shut up and their over the top claims make them look like an idiot. Not fair to the fighter, but it can work that way.
i think the vote carried the fact the majority of people thougfh ancliff

won but i agree certain posters you want to shut up sometimes

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 07:06
by Chambers2
No particular poster has put me off a boxer, but numerous posters on the CS claim they don't like David Haye, because of my over exuberant pro-Haye posts 8)

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 08:02
by stujones
Audley still irritates me...... his post fight interviews while can bring up some gems also smack of some PR guru who has advised him so very badly. I don't know a single other boxer (actually, no sports man) who doesn't look at the interviewer. Audley always just faces the camera, and it is looks so arrogant.... must surely get on Adam Smiths/Ed Robinson's nerves also.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 08:06
by mickey1975
Lenny wrote:Can I ask a question to those who said they hate Froch because of Gomez, if you're down the pub watching a fight of his and somebody down there asks you why you dislike Froch, would you tell them it's because he has a mate on an internet forum who gets on your nerves? Or would saying that kinda make you realise how pathetic that sounds?

I'm always amazed at how emotional some people get at what people on a forum might say.
Yes,i have already said it!Froch did a good job of getting on all my pal's nerves himself,so i didnt get called pathetic.It's a shame really,but the HS P.R machine seem to be getting it wrong.I know a guy who has been on England squads with Carl,and said he's a good bloke.Just does not come across on T.V,does it?Never mind,im getting behind for the Super Six now.BTW,i dont get emotional,just said he was a nob once in a pub and everyone agreed,followed it up by saying people on a forum were making it worse

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 12:27
by Coco
I am much more pro fighters who have been on here and and come across well.
All the Liverpool boys spring to mind, also Martin Power and Larry too.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 14:08
by lefthook82
I'm pro Vladimir due to the endless amount of 'knowledgable' posters who cant get over the fact that there is a heavyweight who isnt big for nothing and doesnt throw shots that shorten the distance between his chin and the opponent's fists

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 14:52
by stujones
lefthook82 wrote:I'm pro Vladimir due to the endless amount of 'knowledgable' posters who cant get over the fact that there is a heavyweight who isnt big for nothing and doesnt throw shots that shorten the distance between his chin and the opponent's fists
It does piss me off a little when people labell them as the same, in terms of offensive ability - good chinned Robot, bad chinned robot.

Very different fighters, very different strengths and weaknesses.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 16:30
by Asterix
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:I'm actually starting to like Khan despite despising him in the first few years of his career. Threads like the recent one by Boxerbob only add to my liking of the fella.
I have the same sort of attitude now re Big Aud. He has been an irritant for ages but people who still don't give him any credit after Friday have got on my nerves.
I like both Khan and Harrison. Yeah, they have their faults, but I think their hearts are in the right place.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 17:50
by m1kee50
Coco wrote:I am much more pro fighters who have been on here and and come across well.
All the Liverpool boys spring to mind, also Martin Power and Larry too.
thats very true, its nice to feel you are somewhat connected lol,

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 18:05
by FLINT ISLAND
forcefraser wrote:I wouldn`t say that I dislike or like a boxer more or less due to the comments written on here.

One exception perhaps, I now really root for Enzo Mac, as the poor bloke has a seriously scary stalker in Flint Island.
He need not worry - in real life - that is away from boxing forums where we come to exclusively talk about boxing - I prefer stalking attractive women :lol: :lol: :lol: :TU:

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 18:10
by FLINT ISLAND
terrez wrote:There's a poster on here that loves Enzo Mac and is in some kind of dream world about his success, ability and future. He makes me dislike him for that, but makes me indifferent about Enzo.

I'm guessing your meaning me - because I cant think of any other poster in particualr your referring too.

You must be a bit slow / thick / retarded mate

I was joking about with all the over the top threads in the past

I have made that clear

I dont love Enzo Macc - not at all - he seems a decent guy I guess

His success - he was a decent Euro level / fringe World level WBO Champion

His ability - a bit limited - but a decent puncher and good speed

His future - looks to have a heavy question mark over it - and his next fight will either confirm him shot or give his career a much needed boost

Really this thread title / subject - is just designed to stir up trouble and rubbish posters

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 12 Apr 2010, 18:18
by mickey1975
It isnt,its a legimate question.I think more now of Paul Smith,Swifty,Moore,Our Larry,etc,than i did before.Remarkable tool the internet.I think less of certain people because of the way their so called mates carry on....

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 03:48
by twenty six
Well Flint I was a big fan of David Haye before your rant and now I think he's the dogs bollocks.
Enzo comments tongue in cheek my arse.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 04:04
by dondada
mickey1975 wrote:It isnt,its a legimate question.I think more now of Paul Smith,Swifty,Moore,Our Larry,etc,than i did before.Remarkable tool the internet.I think less of certain people because of the way their so called mates carry on....
This is exactly what I meant, Mickey. I actually didn't mean for posters to be slagged but can see now that was inevitable. But if you behave like a troll/tit you deserve it anyway.

The likes of Smigga, Jamie Moore, Martin Power, Big Larry O, etc come across very well indeed and will hopefully have gained a few more fans as a result.

Whereas - through no fault of their own - some other boxers have lost support or even gained a few 'haters' simply because of how their mates/relatives/stalkers conduct themselves.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 04:35
by m1kee50
twenty six wrote: Enzo comments tongue in cheek my arse.
Spot on. Way to backtrack, Flint.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 06:41
by Datsue
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Are any of you in this boat?

Do you root for or against any fighters simply because other posters and their attitude gets on your nerves?

I'm thinking of recent threads on Audley/Sprott, Barker/Lee, Gonzalez/Ancliff...

Come on - name and shame!
Yes, yes I am.

But I don't extend that to actual active dislike of the fighter themselves -- not even Audley! My venom (though often misdirected) is intended for the individuals in question, it's just that first thing on a Saturday morning it can go astray.

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 06:42
by dondada
Datsue wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Are any of you in this boat?

Do you root for or against any fighters simply because other posters and their attitude gets on your nerves?

I'm thinking of recent threads on Audley/Sprott, Barker/Lee, Gonzalez/Ancliff...

Come on - name and shame!
Yes, yes I am.

But I don't extend that to actual active dislike of the fighter themselves -- not even Audley! My venom (though often misdirected) is intended for the individuals in question, it's just that first thing on a Saturday morning it can go astray.
:lol: :TU:

Re: Are you pro/anti any boxers because of some Boxrec posters?

Posted: 13 Apr 2010, 07:17
by slapbangwhallop
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:It isnt,its a legimate question.I think more now of Paul Smith,Swifty,Moore,Our Larry,etc,than i did before.Remarkable tool the internet.I think less of certain people because of the way their so called mates carry on....
This is exactly what I meant, Mickey. I actually didn't mean for posters to be slagged but can see now that was inevitable. But if you behave like a troll/tit you deserve it anyway.

The likes of Smigga, Jamie Moore, Martin Power, Big Larry O, etc come across very well indeed and will hopefully have gained a few more fans as a result.

Whereas - through no fault of their own - some other boxers have lost support or even gained a few 'haters' simply because of how their mates/relatives/stalkers conduct themselves.
Not forgetting Darren Sutherland (RIP) who was always a gent and very informative when he came on here.