BoxRec

BoxBuzz wrote:

Goodnight, Irene wrote:It is a shame to see him throw fights though in order to avoid his best contemporaries.

What a morally bankrupt individual

You really think this? Or just being factitious? Seems it would be very hard to make a case for moral bankruptcy. He's been pretty generous with charities with both his money and time. You honestly think he just gave that "0" to Vince that night. Looked like he got caught to me.

G,I's definition of morally bankrupt is a little distorted, given who his favorite fighter is.

Morally bankrupt for an Oscar fan means classy, devoted to family, true champion, etc.

While normal is children from wedlock, women's clothing, failed music career....

BarryWashington wrote:

jezzamundo wrote:It depends how you see the HOF.

Personally for me, Kostya is definitely HOF material. I would personally rate him a smidge below, for example, Lennox Lewis. Both guys who were undiputed champions, made many defenses mostly winning by KO or decisively on points, but never faced another great at their peak. Lennox gets the edge because he avenged his defeats. I have no idea where I would rate Tszyu on an all-time p4p list, but for me he is definitely HOF material.

Lennox's competition is miles above Tszyu's.

Agreed.

Their resumes would be more comparable if you took out Tua, Holyfield and Mercer and left Tyson (Lennox's shot JCC) and Golota/Morrison/Ruddock (akin to Judah/Mitchell)

tzyuforever wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:

Goodnight, Irene wrote:It is a shame to see him throw fights though in order to avoid his best contemporaries.

What a morally bankrupt individual

You really think this? Or just being factitious? Seems it would be very hard to make a case for moral bankruptcy. He's been pretty generous with charities with both his money and time. You honestly think he just gave that "0" to Vince that night. Looked like he got caught to me.

G,I's definition of morally bankrupt is a little distorted, given who his favorite fighter is.

Morally bankrupt for an Oscar fan means classy, devoted to family, true champion, etc.

While normal is children from wedlock, women's clothing, failed music career....

The music career did NOT fail!

It's just another thing De La Hoya does better than Tszyu, anyway 8)

Tszyu had the IBF title in 95`. Lineal champ,he was not,but he sure as fornicate would have been a much tougher fight than an old Chavez. Nice choice for De La Hoya I must say. Mayweather never seriously talked about fighting Tszyu. Tszyu would have wiped the the floor with De La Hoya at 140 anyways. It sucks they didn`t make it happen.

Jpreisser wrote:Tszyu had the IBF title in 95`. Lineal champ,he was not,but he sure as eff would have been a much tougher fight than an old Chavez. Nice choice for De La Hoya I must say. Mayweather never seriously talked about fighting Tszyu. Tszyu would have wiped the the floor with De La Hoya at 140 anyways. It sucks they didn`t make it happen.

You are dreaming --- De La Hoya was never more lethal or dangerous than at 140lbs, & the notion that Tszyu would, "wipe the floor" with that De La Hoya is something I'd never expect to hear beyond the walls of Rockdale Gym

I also quite like your implication De La Hoya fought Chavez to avoid Tszyu. Pity a fight with Chavez was not only for the linear crown, but it was also worth a hundred times what a fight with Tszyu would have made him. That, & the fact that the guy fought just about eveything that moved between 140-154lbs, but ducked Tszyu. LOL.

The fact of the matter is Oscar De La Hoya was a bigger, swifter, more versatile fighter than Tszyu, & he hit just as brutally at this weight, too. De La Hoya stops Tszyu.

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

Jpreisser wrote:Tszyu had the IBF title in 95`. Lineal champ,he was not,but he sure as eff would have been a much tougher fight than an old Chavez. Nice choice for De La Hoya I must say. Mayweather never seriously talked about fighting Tszyu. Tszyu would have wiped the the floor with De La Hoya at 140 anyways. It sucks they didn`t make it happen.

You are dreaming --- De La Hoya was never more lethal or dangerous than at 140lbs, & the notion that Tszyu would, "wipe the floor" with that De La Hoya is something I'd never expect to hear beyond the walls of Rockdale Gym

I also quite like your implication De La Hoya fought Chavez to avoid Tszyu. Pity a fight with Chavez was not only for the linear crown, but it was also worth a hundred times what a fight with Tszyu would have made him. That, & the fact that the guy fought just about eveything that moved between 140-154lbs, but ducked Tszyu. LOL.

The fact of the matter is Oscar De La Hoya was a bigger, swifter, more versatile fighter than Tszyu, & he hit just as brutally at this weight, too. De La Hoya stops Tszyu.

Lol,I am just messing with you,lol. I wasn`t saying he avoided Tszyu I was saying he should have fought him. It suuuuucks that we have to discuss this when they should have decided it in the ring.

They likely would have, were it not for Tszyu dropping the ball unexpectedly against Phillips. I am firmly of the contention that was ultimately good for Tszyu's health. De La Hoya would've given him a pretty bad beating at some point had they met. It's usually considered De La Hoya was faster & more adaptable than Tszyu, but rarely mentioned that at 140lbs, De La Hoya was additionally an absolute monster puncher, & no less punishing than Tszyu.

I uploaded Tszyu/Ruelas today. I believe it is the first upload of this fight to youtube

Tszyu/Hurtado tomorrow

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZD8WEpyQwQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaWNEFx_KTM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YcSk0qWMXA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIV3ZUbPl7s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG4vBSP5dbk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehScWnbasko

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URsgwKW8Gn8

Tszyu-Hurtado kicks fucken arse. Way too forgotten, that scrap. I've never, ever seen an eye swell so fast as that (Lampley: "Look at the mouse under Tszyu's eye!!!" LOL), but he fought through it

That's one great face off there. Much appreciated!

The first round of that fight was awesome. Hurtado looked very hurt after the first knockdown but he bit down and fought hard. I didn`t like the commentary of the fight though. Lampley and Roy Jones kept being shitheads in the rounds after the first. Those bodypunches from Tszyu were lethal in that fight.

BarryWashington wrote:I see no reason why Tszyu should be inducted in the HOF.

no reason, eh?

To quote Phineus & Ferb:

Yes. Yes he is.

I see no reason to deny him his just due. He did all he could during his time at the top and he managed to unify during a time when very few champions were willing to lose their belt in order to gain a genuine championship.

I guess the recent announcement settles this one.

Pretty sh!thouse he gets in first-ballot, BTW. There's really no justification for that.

BoxBuzz wrote:I see no reason to deny him his just due. He did all he could during his time at the top and he managed to unify during a time when very few champions were willing to lose their belt in order to gain a genuine championship.

Still not enough for an "expert" like Irene.

(Notice how she's now keeping away from that thread where I set her a little task? LOL, as granberry would say)

Darling wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:I see no reason to deny him his just due. He did all he could during his time at the top and he managed to unify during a time when very few champions were willing to lose their belt in order to gain a genuine championship.

Still not enough for an "expert" like Irene.

(Notice how she's now keeping away from that thread where I set her a little task? LOL, as granberry would say)

Kid Azteca? D

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

Darling wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:I see no reason to deny him his just due. He did all he could during his time at the top and he managed to unify during a time when very few champions were willing to lose their belt in order to gain a genuine championship.

Still not enough for an "expert" like Irene.

(Notice how she's now keeping away from that thread where I set her a little task? LOL, as granberry would say)

Kid Azteca? D

Come on, Irene. Surely Rupert or one of the other lads at The Back Door Inn can help you identify that fighter I posted for you...

Goodnight, Irene wrote:I guess the recent announcement settles this one.

Pretty sh!thouse he gets in first-ballot, BTW. There's really no justification for that.

I won't say your wrong on this one, but perhaps it's possible that...you're just "not right"?

Buzz, I am all ears on this one.

If you can tell me, as you please, why I or anyone else would be, "not right," to think Tszyu's jumping of a very, very long & distinguished queue is an abomination, I'd be not only open, but actually quite interested, to read it.

Open and interested? Please forgive me, for I have doubts.

At least I deliver points with conviction, right or wrong.

I won't say you're wrong, but perhaps you're, "not right." That is classic nail-biting, fence-sitting BoxBuzz, for you...I tried.

Well I must admit, I switched subjects....I'm eclectic that way. Possible attention deficit disorder I suppose.

Kostya deserves the nod. And yes historically there are those who deserve it more, but it's not like they got this wrong. Sometimes when a name comes up for the first time, and the history is fresh in people's minds, they commit then and there due to the fact that there is some current relevancy. It's a bit on the natural side. You remember Mr Natural dontcha?

Oops there I go again.

Some of the folks that you and I may believe are more worthy are also out of the range of memory for most. No crime there, just the reality that people are willing to turn the page quicker than others would like. Or sometimes it seems the page just turns on it's own lol. I'm happy that the right people who people CAN remember get the nod when the memory is fresh. Some of the old school may never make it unless someone goes on a education campaign via movies. books, or some such.

So sit down, have a coke, relax, and make the best of it.

The truth is rather different --- & more cynical. There is a greater bent than ever before to conduct elections with publicity in mind --- the trend has been obvious in recent years. Present-day, still-alive & still-with-their-faculties-&-some-degree-of-stardom remaining fighters & other figures are worth more in publicity & money, ultimately, to the Hall than are the best of the 1930's, 20's, etc. no matter how much more richly those men may be deserving of election.