Page 3 of 4

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 11:51
by Londonirish
Exoddus wrote:What channel and at what time will this fight be on?

Sky Sports 1 9pm.....


Any Weigh inn Video???





Sorry 8pm

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 13:03
by leforge
Londonirish wrote:
Exoddus wrote:What channel and at what time will this fight be on?

Sky Sports 1 9pm.....


Any Weigh inn Video???
On Maloney Website. Any news on your next fight?

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 13:16
by winkveron
Why is this bill on a Weds night?

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 15:03
by leforge
No sky boxing thus Saturday due to darts I think. Also it says it starts at 8pm.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 15:24
by alexpaterson
Should be a cracker little fight this, I'm really looking forward to it. Bayaar is a tough, strong guy and will look to push the inexpierenced Edwards back and show him the difference in strength between journeymen and British level fighters, though Bayaar can box nicely as he showed against Sexton so this adds another dimension to his game so all in all he's a tough fight for anyone! From what I've heard Edwards is a nice tidy boxer with crisp, clean fast punches so should look to catch Shinny coming in and then move or clinch. Should be a good blend if styles and
make for a good, interesting fight

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:09
by alexpaterson
fornicate sake Bayaar cut badly fight stopped, terrible rule it's over, Bayaar loses his title by a cut fornicating embarrassing rule! There is no benefit in that rule at all!!! Bad cut though

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:10
by Scottrf
Joke. What an awful rule.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:12
by alexpaterson
Scottrf wrote:Joke. What an awful rule.
Totally agree it has no benefit at all!!! Hopefully they change that rule soon

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:13
by alexpaterson
Robert Smith; the rule will change to a technical decision after January 1st. About effing time

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:14
by glens73
Maloney "the result was inevitable" effing hell!!

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:14
by Scottrf
Almost happened in his previous fight too. At least they are changing it I guess but no consolation to Shinny.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:16
by leforge
alexpaterson wrote:Robert Smith; the rule will change to a technical decision after January 1st. About effing time
Smith should have said that a rematch is guaranteed!

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:19
by alexpaterson
Ye agreed it would be a true disgrace if Shinny never got a shot at Edwards.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:21
by Adam1991
Rules Are Rules Boys... And Theee Newwwwwwwwwww

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:25
by Newport Daz
I think Edwards was celebrating a very hollow victory. To celebrate like that was wrong imo. An accidental clash of heads is such a piss poor way to win a fight within 90 seconds when barely a punch has landed. I would be too embarassed to run around the ring and shout the odds. At least when Paul Williams won his fight against Cintron in bizarre circumstances he had the grace to look and act embarassed. Edwards proved nothing.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:28
by crusader
disgusting. I don't care if the rules are the rules.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 16:30
by leforge
BIGMARK wrote:I just caught up on the Sky+ :witzend: You have got to feel for Bayaar as that was such bad luck. I know Frank is trying to support his fighter but to say what he did was silly, Frank has always seemed to be a decent guy so lets hope he gives Bayaar the Re-Match
It was embarrassing all round fom Edwards, Maloney and Smith who could have said we are demanding that Edwards next fight is Bayaar!

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 19:14
by jBacca
Newport Daz wrote:I think Edwards was celebrating a very hollow victory. To celebrate like that was wrong imo. An accidental clash of heads is such a piss poor way to win a fight within 90 seconds when barely a punch has landed. I would be too embarassed to run around the ring and shout the odds. At least when Paul Williams won his fight against Cintron in bizarre circumstances he had the grace to look and act embarassed. Edwards proved nothing.
Get your head out your arse!

Edwards is a young lad who's just been crowned British champ. He's boxed from a young age building up this moment, and he isn't supposed to be made up? Come on now.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 01:28
by Deadendgeneration
jBacca wrote:
Newport Daz wrote:I think Edwards was celebrating a very hollow victory. To celebrate like that was wrong imo. An accidental clash of heads is such a piss poor way to win a fight within 90 seconds when barely a punch has landed. I would be too embarassed to run around the ring and shout the odds. At least when Paul Williams won his fight against Cintron in bizarre circumstances he had the grace to look and act embarassed. Edwards proved nothing.
Get your head out your arse!

Edwards is a young lad who's just been crowned British champ. He's boxed from a young age building up this moment, and he isn't supposed to be made up? Come on now.


Behave bacca you think any pro who's given there life to a sport dreams of winning it like that? That was embarrassing. I respect your views on most things on here but you're blinded when in comes to scouse fighters.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 03:54
by Newport Daz
jBacca wrote:
Newport Daz wrote:I think Edwards was celebrating a very hollow victory. To celebrate like that was wrong imo. An accidental clash of heads is such a piss poor way to win a fight within 90 seconds when barely a punch has landed. I would be too embarassed to run around the ring and shout the odds. At least when Paul Williams won his fight against Cintron in bizarre circumstances he had the grace to look and act embarassed. Edwards proved nothing.
Get your head out your arse!

Edwards is a young lad who's just been crowned British champ. He's boxed from a young age building up this moment, and he isn't supposed to be made up? Come on now.
I'm sorry pal but Edwards "won" nothing. 90 seconds into a fight and an accidental clash of heads stops the contest. To run around the ring celebrating like that was embarassing. You think he should feel satisfied "winning" like that?

Both guys will have worked their arses off for that fight and for a champion to lose his title like that is an utter disgrace. Not Edwards fault granted, but he is now champion without winning a round, scoring a knokdown or even landing a meaningful punch.
You think winning a title like that should be celebrated?


One of us has are heads up are arse, but as the neutral unbiased guy it's not me.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 07:38
by jBacca
Deadendgeneration wrote: Behave bacca you think any pro who's given there life to a sport dreams of winning it like that? That was embarrassing. I respect your views on most things on here but you're blinded when in comes to scouse fighters.
Newport Daz wrote:
jBacca wrote:
I'm sorry pal but Edwards "won" nothing. 90 seconds into a fight and an accidental clash of heads stops the contest. To run around the ring celebrating like that was embarassing. You think he should feel satisfied "winning" like that?

Both guys will have worked their arses off for that fight and for a champion to lose his title like that is an utter disgrace. Not Edwards fault granted, but he is now champion without winning a round, scoring a knokdown or even landing a meaningful punch.
You think winning a title like that should be celebrated?


One of us has are heads up are arse, but as the neutral unbiased guy it's not me.
Edwards said as much in the interview, but to say he can't celebrate because it's embarrassing? Get a grip boys.

He's British champ, regardless of how the fight ended - what if he'd won a world title in a similar matter, say his opponent injured himself a hand during the first, would you call him embarrasing for celebrating that? My arse.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 08:22
by Newport Daz
He wouldn't have won a world title like that as it would have been declared a NC.

If you think winning a British title fight like that should be celebrated, then fair enough that's your opinion. The fact he is now called British champion without winning a round, scoring a KD/KO or even landing a meaningful punch leaves a bitter taste in my mouth as did the celebrations. You get excited about it if you want mate that's your right but I feel sorry for Shinny being robbed like that.

Hopefully the BBBoC do the right thing and it gets settled in the ring properly.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 08:31
by el_grande_mauro_mina
jBacca wrote:
He's British champ, regardless of how the fight ended - what if he'd won a world title in a similar matter, say his opponent injured himself a hand during the first, would you call him embarrasing for celebrating that? My arse.
Sorry to be contrary Jai but it was embarrassing because it was such a hollow victory. I haven't seen a victory more hollower in fact in over 30 years of watching this sport - I remember reading about Andre Hoylk beating Jim Watt on a first round cut stoppage but it was nothing like that if I remember rightly. One thing is for sure that there has to be an immediate re-match.

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 10:15
by ciaranlfc
i dont give a fornicate eddys champion im made up for him on a clash or heads or not blame the bbboc most people would have celebrated like that after 8 bouts to win the british title well in eddy lad!

Re: paul edwards v shinny bayaar british title

Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 10:16
by jBacca
Newport Daz wrote:He wouldn't have won a world title like that as it would have been declared a NC.

If you think winning a British title fight like that should be celebrated, then fair enough that's your opinion. The fact he is now called British champion without winning a round, scoring a KD/KO or even landing a meaningful punch leaves a bitter taste in my mouth as did the celebrations. You get excited about it if you want mate that's your right but I feel sorry for Shinny being robbed like that.

Hopefully the BBBoC do the right thing and it gets settled in the ring properly.
Carlos-Wigan wrote:
Sorry to be contrary Jai but it was embarrassing because it was such a hollow victory. I haven't seen a victory more hollower in fact in over 30 years of watching this sport - I remember reading about Andre Hoylk beating Jim Watt on a first round cut stoppage but it was nothing like that if I remember rightly. One thing is for sure that there has to be an immediate re-match.
Since the result, Edwards has said he thought the cut was made by the punch that landed just prior to the head clash. During his celebrations, the ref appears to tell him something down the lines of it being the head that caused it, and Edwards calms down. Edwards didn't celebrate when his hand was lifted, and acknowledged what happened in the post-fight interview. Do you still think his reactions were embarrassing?

^^ this is in Edwards defence. Myself, I still believe i'd be over the fvcking moon at being crowned British Champ, regardless of how it happened.