Re: Kessler withdraws from Super Six
Posted: 26 Aug 2010, 05:32
I thnk so long as we get to watch at least some of the top guys face each other, no matter what the outcome, format or net result - We need to see those fights.
Otherwise you end up like we did in the mid-late 90s onwards where you had paper champs defending their titles against a steady stream of promoter manipulated rankings and the top guys who clearly do have talent, NOT facing each other.
You can't have everyone face each other, that's just not realistic.
I mean, people talk about the golden TV age of the middleweights where Hagler/Hearns/SRL/Duran all faced each other...which in reality they did, but you have to look at it objectively and say that at least three of those fights had a slight stench about them and they also spanned nearly a decade...I mean, if those fights all happened in 12-24 months like everyone seems to want these fights to happen, you'd have at least one fighter having his career cut short and the overall legacy of maybe 2 of them being tarnished perhaps.
You need to build fighters and careers, but at the same time, not let them stagnate and feast on easy fights.
If this were a straight elim. tourney, then Dirrell would already be out and wouldn't have won by DQ to AA. Kessler would be out and have no world title. Froch would still have his title and fighting who? AA?
People would still be saying Froch fight Dirrell, AD would be moaning that he should still be unbeaten blah blah. Kessler would be on the outside looking in (no pun intended) and many people would have condemned him as finished etc.
Otherwise you end up like we did in the mid-late 90s onwards where you had paper champs defending their titles against a steady stream of promoter manipulated rankings and the top guys who clearly do have talent, NOT facing each other.
You can't have everyone face each other, that's just not realistic.
I mean, people talk about the golden TV age of the middleweights where Hagler/Hearns/SRL/Duran all faced each other...which in reality they did, but you have to look at it objectively and say that at least three of those fights had a slight stench about them and they also spanned nearly a decade...I mean, if those fights all happened in 12-24 months like everyone seems to want these fights to happen, you'd have at least one fighter having his career cut short and the overall legacy of maybe 2 of them being tarnished perhaps.
You need to build fighters and careers, but at the same time, not let them stagnate and feast on easy fights.
If this were a straight elim. tourney, then Dirrell would already be out and wouldn't have won by DQ to AA. Kessler would be out and have no world title. Froch would still have his title and fighting who? AA?
People would still be saying Froch fight Dirrell, AD would be moaning that he should still be unbeaten blah blah. Kessler would be on the outside looking in (no pun intended) and many people would have condemned him as finished etc.