Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Horse »

Deno1986 wrote:Maybe even the Belarussian that beat Jamie Moore, he has always been a 'call up late' opponent.
He would be an awful opponent.

Andy Lee, John Duddy, Martin Murray or Craig McEwan would all be good British/Irish replacements for Barker.
Barry big balz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 112
Joined: 10 Sep 2009, 23:21

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Barry big balz »

leforge wrote:
Barry big balz wrote:He wont need that EBU title around his waist while getting his hip done in surgery. If he has any class he will vacate. :TU:
He won't vacate I Bet!
If he doesnt vacate it will hard to believe that injury was genuine and not a blatant duck of macklin in hope of an easier defence or two..
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by crusader »

Horse wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Maybe even the Belarussian that beat Jamie Moore, he has always been a 'call up late' opponent.
He would be an awful opponent.

Andy Lee, John Duddy, Martin Murray or Craig McEwan would all be good British/Irish replacements for Barker.
Those would be the ideal replacements. Khomitski was stopped in his last fight and would never really have a chance at winning. Belghecham would be ok if none of those guys are willing.
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Deno1986 »

Horse wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Maybe even the Belarussian that beat Jamie Moore, he has always been a 'call up late' opponent.
He would be an awful opponent.

Andy Lee, John Duddy, Martin Murray or Craig McEwan would all be good British/Irish replacements for Barker.
Yes but I listed Khomitski [sp] as a last minute opponent who would be willing to fight on the 18th if Macklin was still on the bill. I don't think Lee, Duddy, Murray or McEwan would take the fight on such short notice...
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5430
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by forcefraser »

I can see the Cleverly fight falling apart next.

How exactly does a proffesional boxer get a hip injury??
robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by robpalmer135 »

heard about this two weeks ago, posted.....mocked lol

Barker has been out of this fight for along time. not sure why it took so long to sort out. the injury is legit though.

Here is the current EBU rankings. Wouldn't be surprised if we see the Macklin fight one of those in bold for the vacant title, with the Barker fight set for the end of the year.

MIDDLEWEIGHTS(up to 72,574 kg)
* Champ: Darren BARKER (GB) * Chall: Matthew MACKLIN (GB)
Contenders:
1. Mahir ORAL (DE/LV)
2. Domenico SPADA (IT)
3. Gregorz PROKSA (PL/GB)
4. Gennadi GOLOVKIN (KZ/DE)
5. Andy LEE (IE)
6. Martin MURRAY (GB)
7. Yves STUDER (CH)
8. Affif BELGHECHAM (FR)
9. Maksim BURSAK (UA)
10. Shalva JOMARDASHVILI (GE)
11. Julien Marie SAINTE (FR)

12. Darren Mc DERMOTT (GB)
13. Sergey KHOMITSKY (BY)
14. Mariusz CENDROWSKI (PL)
15. Ruben VARON (ES)
16. Francois BASTIENT (FR)
17. Dominik BRITSCH (DE)

18. Pablo NAVASCUES (ES)
robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by robpalmer135 »

forcefraser wrote:How exactly does a proffesional boxer get a hip injury??
is this a serious question?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Horse »

Deno1986 wrote:Yes but I listed Khomitski [sp] as a last minute opponent who would be willing to fight on the 18th if Macklin was still on the bill.
They have two weeks to find a replacement though (more if they already knew about this). There is nothing magnificent about Macklin vs Khomitski, if they don't get Macklin a good replacement for Barker then the PPV figures will be hurt.
Deno1986 wrote:I don't think Lee, Duddy, Murray or McEwan would take the fight on such short notice...
Probably not, but if they are offered a good payday then it is possible.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by black panther »

FOR FOOKS SAKE!!!! :witzend:

Despite an overall great card, this was the fight of the card for me. Gutted and gutted for Macklin too. They'll be hard pressed to find a decent replacement at 2 and half weeks notice. Noticed the good ole "Battersea Bomber" is still fighting.......sure he's past his past but he's durable...wonder if he'd be up for it?
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Deno1986 »

Horse wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Yes but I listed Khomitski [sp] as a last minute opponent who would be willing to fight on the 18th if Macklin was still on the bill.
They have two weeks to find a replacement though (more if they already knew about this). There is nothing magnificent about Macklin vs Khomitski, if they don't get Macklin a good replacement for Barker then the PPV figures will be hurt.
Deno1986 wrote:I don't think Lee, Duddy, Murray or McEwan would take the fight on such short notice...
Probably not, but if they are offered a good payday then it is possible.
I think the potential PPV sales are severely damaged already. With Barker-Macklin on the bill it shouldn't really have been PPV anyway or maybe it was judging by todays standards of what is considered PPV worthy. Now with Macklin vs TBA or no Macklin at all, it should be pulled from PPV altogether.
Last edited by Deno1986 on 01 Sep 2010, 18:41, edited 2 times in total.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5430
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by forcefraser »

robpalmer135 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:How exactly does a proffesional boxer get a hip injury??
is this a serious question?
Yeah it`s a serious question.

Must have been something that happened outside of training?

Eye damage, cuts, hand trouble I can work out, but the old hip thing has me confused.

The game`s not straight if you knew about it two weeks ago, yet they wait until now to call the fight off. Unless of course they were hoping it would improve enough for him to fight.
robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by robpalmer135 »

forcefraser wrote:
robpalmer135 wrote:Yeah it`s a serious question.

Must have been something that happened outside of training?
Fair enough. Boxers will use there hips an awful lot its a common injury but normally one fighters can shake off. Its probably general wear and tear that has built up over time and caused a problem that cannot be fixed.

theres interviews with barker earlier on in the year saying he needed hip surgery.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5430
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by forcefraser »

robpalmer135 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:
robpalmer135 wrote:Yeah it`s a serious question.

Must have been something that happened outside of training?
Fair enough. Boxers will use there hips an awful lot its a common injury but normally one fighters can shake off. Its probably general wear and tear that has built up over time and caused a problem that cannot be fixed.

theres interviews with barker earlier on in the year saying he needed hip surgery.
Sounds pretty serious. Let`s hope the op sorts it out and he can get back in the ring soon.

Although he struggled in his last fight, I like his style in the ring. Gutted about the fight, would have been a belter.
robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by robpalmer135 »

Barker's team wanted to pull him out 3 weeks ago but he refused. finally the pain got to much and he was forced out on monday. he needs hip surgery. he is genuinely injured and gutted.

had said he will vacate european and let macklin fight for it if he is guaranteed the shot when he returns but macklins team will not agree to it at the moment.
robpalmer135
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 May 2009, 17:18

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by robpalmer135 »

mickey1975 wrote:I wondered what he was on about with the 4k tickets comment.For a fight in Birmingham?Absolute poop.He doesnt sell that many in London.There will be big teams from London who dont always shift that many for games at St Andrews and Villa Park.
Barker is a big ticket seller in london. probably the biggest after haye now mitchells of the scene. he had already shifted 2500 for the show but stopped selling a few weeks back which is why the rumours started in north london

he is a top 10 ticket seller in uk boxing.
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Lightsoot »

A genuine shame. I was fortunate enough to speak to Darren a few weeks ago now and he seemed so up for the fight so I don't doubt his injury is legit.

I hope they can find a replacement. It's going to be relatively short notice but I'd personally be delighted if Martin Murray got the gig. Nice kid, good fighter, hungry, and far better than what he showed last time out.

Let's wait and see. It's still a good bill but undoubtedly Macklin-Barker was the standout fight.
ERIC GUY
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 30 Jan 2009, 21:13

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by ERIC GUY »

Thats true - the bloke from my corner shop told me this one late on - mightily p*ssed off I was nowhere near the first with the news!!! - mind you I always enjoy getting my paper from him and hearing the latest boxing news. Keeps telling me about a big show in December/January - everytime I go in he changes his mind which one of those months it is
so thats how you get all your boxing info!!!
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by states »

doctorboxing wrote:The headliner being off is a massive blow for this bill and if any of Brook-Jennings, Sexton-Chisora or Cleverly-Murat join Macklin-Barker then the whole bill will flop on PPV.
Cleverly-Murat is my top tip for a fight that doesn't happen. Any takers?
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by slapbangwhallop »

So who next for Macklin?

here are a few suggestions.

http://www.boxing-ireland.com/20100902_ ... ut_50.html
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by GlobalBox »

leforge wrote:
Barry big balz wrote:He wont need that EBU title around his waist while getting his hip done in surgery. If he has any class he will vacate. :TU:
He won't vacate I Bet!
Apparently he has said he will but wants first shot at the winner, something that is not forthcoming at present, but surely that can be sorted out failing that its about time we had another belt how about the

"iNTERIM" EBU Middleweight

:shame:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by leforge »

robpalmer135 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I wondered what he was on about with the 4k tickets comment.For a fight in Birmingham?Absolute poop.He doesnt sell that many in London.There will be big teams from London who dont always shift that many for games at St Andrews and Villa Park.
Barker is a big ticket seller in london. probably the biggest after haye now mitchells of the scene. he had already shifted 2500 for the show but stopped selling a few weeks back which is why the rumours started in north london

he is a top 10 ticket seller in uk boxing.
How do you know he shifted 2500 tickets? Barker support includes loads of racists boxing better off without them.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22948
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by mickey1975 »

Well,ive seen Mitchell live in Manchester and Newcastle and i bet he didnt sell 100 tickets for either.I saw Haye in Huddersfield whilst he was a Euro champ and i bet he didnt sell 20 tickets!To be the best behind them two doesnt indicate that great a ticketseller.If he's that good,why doesnt MH make his next fight for the Excell?they will be turning them away at the door.What happens now with Darrens fans?I dont know if old Fwank will dish out "2500" refunds a fortnight before the fight.Subject to change and all that.
Smokin Preedy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 118
Joined: 04 Mar 2010, 10:01

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Smokin Preedy »

Such a shame would have been the best fight on the card i believe
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Counter-puncher »

mickey1975 wrote:I wondered what he was on about with the 4k tickets comment.For a fight in Birmingham?Absolute poop.He doesnt sell that many in London.There will be big teams from London who dont always shift that many for games at St Andrews and Villa Park.
agreed, i said this at the time.
Happy Slapper
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 499
Joined: 20 Jul 2008, 16:22

Re: Barker v Macklin off!!!!!

Post by Happy Slapper »

Makes you wonder if Barker fancies this....

He was poor last time out and maybe his team think its a fight or two too soon.
Post Reply