BoxRec

Smigga wrote:

hurlock wrote:the way young ingle was talking to david in the corner in his last fight, told me he aint the most confident when he's in the ring.

i dont know if this will be the equivilant of moore v facey, but could be possibly if smith use's his pedigree & takes his time setting his punche's up as he does get a bit smash & grab at times imo.

& how smigga can come on here & read stuff on himself i dont know??...doe's it give you fuel smigga??

No it doesn't. I don't get in the ring thinking about proving boxrec doubters wrong. ANY doubters for that matter. Negative motivation is no good - tried that in the past it got me nowhere.
I know what I can do, people around me do, it's just putting it all together at the right time, right place, right opponent and right world title hopefully, that will then convince the doubters that!

Good attitude to have mate!

you sound like an oppurtunist with right this & right that. i find it abit brazen & fan's get let down by that attitude. probably speaking for myself here.it's almost like you believe that's the only way you'll win a title.

just read this back & it sound's aggressive
no disrespect intended

people will get behind you & your earlier statement makes you sound like a manufactured fighter & i think you can fight that's all,for what it matter's.

hurlock wrote:you sound like an oppurtunist with right this & right that. i find it abit brazen & fan's get let down by that attitude. probably speaking for myself here.it's almost like you believe that's the only way you'll win a title.

just read this back & it sound's aggressive
no disrespect intended

people will get behind you & your earlier statement makes you sound like a manufactured fighter & i think you can fight that's all,for what it matter's.

I'm no opportunist, I'll win ugly every single day of the week. Cut to shreds, down 4 times whatever it takes as long as it's a win. You were going on about good performances. A good performance needs the right factors, mainly being opponent.

Smigga wrote:

hurlock wrote:you sound like an oppurtunist with right this & right that. i find it abit brazen & fan's get let down by that attitude. probably speaking for myself here.it's almost like you believe that's the only way you'll win a title.

just read this back & it sound's aggressive
no disrespect intended

people will get behind you & your earlier statement makes you sound like a manufactured fighter & i think you can fight that's all,for what it matter's.

I'm no opportunist, I'll win ugly every single day of the week. Cut to shreds, down 4 times whatever it takes as long as it's a win. You were going on about good performances. A good performance needs the right factors, mainly being opponent.

Paul, I see where Brian Magee is confident of getting a world title fight agains Dimitr Sartson. If he is successful do you see yourself challenging for that title.

paul david is akward as :!: .if i remember correctly, he gave magee a few problem's & was very green at the time. along with magee being better then aswell.
i dont think he is an easy night's work for anyone.

misticmonk wrote:

Smigga wrote:

hurlock wrote:you sound like an oppurtunist with right this & right that. i find it abit brazen & fan's get let down by that attitude. probably speaking for myself here.it's almost like you believe that's the only way you'll win a title.

just read this back & it sound's aggressive
no disrespect intended

people will get behind you & your earlier statement makes you sound like a manufactured fighter & i think you can fight that's all,for what it matter's.

I'm no opportunist, I'll win ugly every single day of the week. Cut to shreds, down 4 times whatever it takes as long as it's a win. You were going on about good performances. A good performance needs the right factors, mainly being opponent.

Paul, I see where Brian Magee is confident of getting a world title fight agains Dimitr Sartson. If he is successful do you see yourself challenging for that title.

I'd love to, if Magee gets there first then I wish him well and would love him to win - Me being 1st defence of course!

robpalmer135 wrote:

hurlock wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote:I think Paul David can win this. Smith should be a Middleweight and David is a huge Super Middle. Smith hasn't got the style to beat a fighter that much bigger/stronger than him. add to the David is also quite tricky.

what level do you class david at??

Lower domestic. English title level.

anyone seen the fight poster....spot the error??

http://www.allegedly.tv/boxing/images ... poster.jpg

Levels? Let's talk about levels paul david is the current super middleweight english championm
A title paul smith couldn't win and he was beaten by a faded steven bendal.david has beaten andrew lowe,peter haymer and gave brian magee a scare too.

Paul Smith WAS English Middleweight Champion... Suggest you get it right before posting in future

SexySouthPaw wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote:

hurlock wrote: what level do you class david at??

Lower domestic. English title level.

anyone seen the fight poster....spot the error??

http://www.allegedly.tv/boxing/images ... poster.jpg

Levels? Let's talk about levels paul david is the current super middleweight english championm
A title paul smith couldn't win and he was beaten by a faded steven bendal.david has beaten andrew lowe,peter haymer and gave brian magee a scare too.

I couldn't win the English super middleweight title as I was British champion already ;)
As for the loss to the faded Bendall - ask anyone who saw it who they thought should have got the decision. It was a terrible performance, weight drained and way below par but I won at least 7 rounds! That's being generous.

Smigga wrote: ask anyone who saw it who they thought should have got the decision. It was a terrible performance, weight drained and way below par but I won at least 7 rounds! That's being generous.

Well, it was one of those that suffered from the single referee scoring system. I saw it (from a distance), and would say it was close/balanced enough (ie, neither dominated) .