BoxRec

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:

Smigga wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote: ah quite right. either way i still think before last week woodhouse should have been ranked ahead of you. i still think you would beat everyone on that list apart from the top 3 right now, and will beat them in the future. just like i have Smith ahead of Groves and DeGale but think both would take him comfortably.

I think I would take you comfortably when it comes to boxing ratings, knowledge and criticism of fighters using the pen(which you are claiming to be good at). I could compile far better British ratings, with correct spelling of names for starters like Shelkirk, Fergersuon, Olubawimou, Alafoabi, Dunston, Ojuederrie, Ibbitson, Cleverly, McEnzie, Mativenko, Theopanane, Haugain, Oleguseun, Lynnes, McDonough, McArhhur, or Fehnitola.

But hey, who's looking?

You're starting to show your true, arsehole like colours that you've displayed on esb for a long time now.
It was only a matter of time.

Smigga get you training lad instead of pulling up his spelling mistakes, you have a important fight coming up

And I have paid for the good seats for this so expect a good show as well.

Is there a legitimate ranking or just boxrec points an rob palmers opinion

Frankie Gavin wrote:Is there a legitimate ranking or just boxrec points an rob palmers opinion

Its just Robs opinion....cant go to far wrong with the weekly trade papers rankings if u ask me....boxrecs ratings are very poor

Who does boxrecs ratings cause not sure how ail an war can be above me I have looked at who he has boxed i think 1 maybe 2 winning records an his been beat to a guy who had a losing record at the time

Smigga wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote:

Frankie Gavin wrote:Woodhouse ent boxed Harrison so no

ah quite right. either way i still think before last week woodhouse should have been ranked ahead of you. i still think you would beat everyone on that list apart from the top 3 right now, and will beat them in the future. just like i have Smith ahead of Groves and DeGale but think both would take him comfortably.

I think I would take you comfortably when it comes to boxing ratings, knowledge and criticism of fighters using the pen(which you are claiming to be good at). I could compile far better British ratings, with correct spelling of names for starters like Shelkirk, Fergersuon, Olubawimou, Alafoabi, Dunston, Ojuederrie, Ibbitson, Cleverly, McEnzie, Mativenko, Theopanane, Haugain, Oleguseun, Lynnes, McDonough, McArhhur, or Fehnitola.

But hey, who's looking?

You're starting to show your true, arsehole like colours that you've displayed on esb for a long time now.
It was only a matter of time.

Spelling aside There is actually not that much wrong with Robs ratings to be honest. Didn't see any problem in having Curtis above Frankie after stoppage wins over Hickman and Stefy Bull, wasn't much between him and Frankie in terms of record at all. Likewise with the Bellew/McIntosh argument, stopping Oakey in the 2nd in addition to fighters like Spartacus, Barney and Vegas just give him the edge over Bellews record at the moment. Although like pretty much everyone else I would pick Bellew to finish McIntosh off you have to base rankings on what has transpired, not what might/could/will happen.

4 posts you've made in this thread, yet not one has been a constructive post despite you being able to "compile far better British ratings"

Frankie Gavin wrote:Who does boxrecs ratings cause not sure how ail an war can be above me I have looked at who he has boxed i think 1 maybe 2 winning records an his been beat to a guy who had a losing record at the time

I thought Boxrecs was all computerised?

Not sure what that exactly means, whether theres one magic computer that decides it all or if someone inputs certain attributes and stats in and it works it out. I'd like to know how its done to be honest. Some truly bizarre boxrec rankings though.

Smigga wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote:

Frankie Gavin wrote:Woodhouse ent boxed Harrison so no

ah quite right. either way i still think before last week woodhouse should have been ranked ahead of you. i still think you would beat everyone on that list apart from the top 3 right now, and will beat them in the future. just like i have Smith ahead of Groves and DeGale but think both would take him comfortably.

I think I would take you comfortably when it comes to boxing ratings, knowledge and criticism of fighters using the pen(which you are claiming to be good at). I could compile far better British ratings, with correct spelling of names for starters like Shelkirk, Fergersuon, Olubawimou, Alafoabi, Dunston, Ojuederrie, Ibbitson, Cleverly, McEnzie, Mativenko, Theopanane, Haugain, Oleguseun, Lynnes, McDonough, McArhhur, or Fehnitola.

But hey, who's looking?

You're starting to show your true, arsehole like colours that you've displayed on esb for a long time now.
It was only a matter of time.

why am i showing my true colours as an arsehole? when have i ever claimed to be good at these things. i am just posting on here as i enjoy boxing.

lets see you give it a good with ranking a top 15 in each division then???

just because i dont rate you as a boxer doesn't mean my opinion counts for nothing.

robpalmer135 wrote:

Smigga wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote: ah quite right. either way i still think before last week woodhouse should have been ranked ahead of you. i still think you would beat everyone on that list apart from the top 3 right now, and will beat them in the future. just like i have Smith ahead of Groves and DeGale but think both would take him comfortably.

I think I would take you comfortably when it comes to boxing ratings, knowledge and criticism of fighters using the pen(which you are claiming to be good at). I could compile far better British ratings, with correct spelling of names for starters like Shelkirk, Fergersuon, Olubawimou, Alafoabi, Dunston, Ojuederrie, Ibbitson, Cleverly, McEnzie, Mativenko, Theopanane, Haugain, Oleguseun, Lynnes, McDonough, McArhhur, or Fehnitola.

But hey, who's looking?

You're starting to show your true, arsehole like colours that you've displayed on esb for a long time now.
It was only a matter of time.

why am i showing my true colours as an arsehole? when have i ever claimed to be good at these things. i am just posting on here as i enjoy boxing.

lets see you give it a good with ranking a top 15 in each division then???

just because i dont rate you as a boxer doesn't mean my opinion counts for nothing.

Ah but you do rate me, Rob.... #3 at Super Middle

Smigga wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote:

Smigga wrote: I think I would take you comfortably when it comes to boxing ratings, knowledge and criticism of fighters using the pen(which you are claiming to be good at). I could compile far better British ratings, with correct spelling of names for starters like Shelkirk, Fergersuon, Olubawimou, Alafoabi, Dunston, Ojuederrie, Ibbitson, Cleverly, McEnzie, Mativenko, Theopanane, Haugain, Oleguseun, Lynnes, McDonough, McArhhur, or Fehnitola.

But hey, who's looking?

You're starting to show your true, arsehole like colours that you've displayed on esb for a long time now.
It was only a matter of time.

why am i showing my true colours as an arsehole? when have i ever claimed to be good at these things. i am just posting on here as i enjoy boxing.

lets see you give it a good with ranking a top 15 in each division then???

just because i dont rate you as a boxer doesn't mean my opinion counts for nothing.

Ah but you do rate me, Rob.... #3 at Super Middle

Paul - from one scholar to another...

Why do you care what any one poster thinks of you. I think I speak for us all when I say we would have loved to achieved what you have.

Lets put it another way - if I was Paul Smith - I would not give two shits what RobPalmer1997 thinks about me - I would go and have a nice cup of tea, take my lonsdale belt out from under my bed and give it a little polish with a can of Mr Sheen and a cloth.

Carlos-Wigan wrote:

Smigga wrote:

robpalmer135 wrote: why am i showing my true colours as an arsehole? when have i ever claimed to be good at these things. i am just posting on here as i enjoy boxing.

lets see you give it a good with ranking a top 15 in each division then???

just because i dont rate you as a boxer doesn't mean my opinion counts for nothing.

Ah but you do rate me, Rob.... #3 at Super Middle

Paul - from one scholar to another...

Why do you care what any one poster thinks of you. I think I speak for us all when I say we would have loved to achieved what you have.

Lets put it another way - if I was Paul Smith - I would not give two shits what RobPalmer1997 thinks about me - I would go and have a nice cup of tea, take my lonsdale belt out from under my bed and give it a little polish with a can of Mr Sheen and a cloth.

I agree but every post i make on here he chips in with a smart ass comment. Pretty sad.

I agree to an extent. Smigga, you can't have your cake and eat it, come on here to have your say and then get mad when you're slated.
When you come on a forum, you're fair game (within reason).
Grow a thicker skin... Or let yours fists do the talking.

ApolloCreed wrote:I agree to an extent. Smigga, you can't have your cake and eat it, come on here to have your say and then get mad when you're slated.
When you come on a forum, you're fair game (within reason).
Grow a thicker skin... Or let yours fists do the talking.

Hang on, I've got thick skin. I can give it as well as take it that's my point - some people can't. robpalmer has been at the insults for years on the other sh*thole esb. My point is it will come out on here soon enough.

I'm off to do a cup of tea

Smigga wrote:Hang on, I've got thick skin. I can give it as well as take it that's my point - some people can't. robpalmer has been at the insults for years on the other sh*thole esb. My point is it will come out on here soon enough.

I'm off to do a cup of tea

LOL you really don't have thick skin.

robpalmer135 wrote:

Smigga wrote:Hang on, I've got thick skin. I can give it as well as take it that's my point - some people can't. robpalmer has been at the insults for years on the other sh*thole esb. My point is it will come out on here soon enough.

I'm off to do a cup of tea

LOL you really don't have thick skin.

You are not on ESB now - grow up!

robpalmer135 wrote:

Smigga wrote:Hang on, I've got thick skin. I can give it as well as take it that's my point - some people can't. robpalmer has been at the insults for years on the other sh*thole esb. My point is it will come out on here soon enough.

I'm off to do a cup of tea

LOL you really don't have thick skin.

we know that from the cuts hes had