Page 3 of 3

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 03:24
by m1kee50
Fist of Legend wrote:Carlos Palomino challenges Vernon Forrest

Rube Ferns challenges Paul Williams
Done

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 03:24
by m1kee50
hitman09 wrote:Whitaker still wants Pacquiao.
and done

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 06:25
by glittermonkey
JDC wrote:Ryan will fight any of the fighters who are left
Hearns hasn't faced Ryan yet. Come get some.

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 07:39
by JDC
glittermonkey wrote:
JDC wrote:Ryan will fight any of the fighters who are left
Hearns hasn't faced Ryan yet. Come get some.
:TU:

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 09:34
by The End
Armstrong calls out Packey Mcfarland


Ross calls out Buddy Mcgirt

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 10:27
by glittermonkey
JDC wrote:
glittermonkey wrote:
JDC wrote:Ryan will fight any of the fighters who are left
Hearns hasn't faced Ryan yet. Come get some.
:TU:
Sweet.

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 13:24
by allworld80
UNMATCHED FIGHTERS

FIST OF LEGEND - RUBE FERNS
GRIMM - EMILE GRIFFITH

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 14:14
by allworld80
Bah Griffith vs Ferns

Running this now

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 14:50
by Fist of Legend
tzyuforever wrote:Bah Griffith vs Ferns

Running this now
decent matchup, I'm cool with that 8)

Re: WW SEASON WEEK 29 MATCHUPS

Posted: 09 Dec 2010, 16:00
by Crease
BoxBuzz wrote:in this world of Simulated Multiple "trinket titles"
I suppose they are only "trinket titles" until a BoxBuzz fighter holds them. Then and only then are they valid. Buzz, you're insanity is a bit much at times...
BoxBuzz wrote:Many folks have held all 5 titles. And some have tossed a few away to confuse and befuddle the Lilliputian (aka YOU).
Lay off the Jonathan Swift references old timer.