Re: Richard towers
Posted: 31 Jan 2011, 05:06
Yawn I don't really do arguing on the internet, it is very sad so I won't carry on. Oooh 'you wrote this look I can quote little segments of your posts'. Waste of time and energy.
"6'8 and looking like he does"TheCobra wrote:What a ridiculous post. I am basing it on the fact that he has been involved clearly in criminal gangs and at 6'8 and looking like he does PLUS the criminal gang stuff, he is clearly no angel. Can't be doing with arseholes like you posting snidey remarks.Deserter wrote:So, we've basically established that anyone who is:TheCobra wrote: I believe that at 6'8" and looking like he does, he aint all sweetness and nice!
a) Tall
and
b) Not baby-faced
Is likely to be of dubious character. Fascinating deductive skills...
So I had the out and out cheek to say I won't particularly be sticking up for him as I'm not a big fan of criminals. All of a sudden everyone on this topic is his best mate, knows his business, knows the ins and outs of what he did or didn't do and is prepared to back it all up. What a country we live in.
You keep making that point. You're reminding me of an old sketch from "Not the 9 o'clock news" -
"being in possession of tight black curly hair......treading on the cracks of the pavement"
