BoxRec

Surely, as what happened with Dilks the first time he was in PF, this can be overturned??

Unless it come back after the break that was a mistaken verdict .The judge is incompetant that is ridiculous reid dominating round tops it off with a knock down the round is scored 10.10 ruined the night for me cuz it just shows how bad it is for the away guy in boxing even live on sky.

bfchunk wrote:

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Fantastic fight. I know a lot of people don't like Prizefighter but that's the sort of contest which makes it worth watching.

Another example of the sport doing one good thing then shooting itself in the foot. Enjoyable fight now overshadowed by appalling scoring. Never written to the BBBofC before, but tempted to do so to have a right winge about that.

I have once, about their cuts rule late last year. Changed it shortly after, coincidence? 8)

Just goes to show the dodgy things that happen when they fiddle around with the scoring. I remember one at Earl's COurt where it was scored 58-57 or something with only one knockdown. If it's a draw, call it a draw and then have the guy going through based on punch stats or something. It's not down to the judges to change their scoring to fit the event.

black panther wrote:

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:30-28 to Ainscough is quite literally impossible.

What a complete load of sh1te. Surely that must be a mistake.

x2 Baffling. Unless he scored the first two to Ainscough and thought Ainscough was winning the last up until the kncokdown and scored the last a 10-10.

Yes, that's the only way it could have happened, I think....but even then I think he would have had to have Ainscough winning the last by a long way...utter sh1t that card though, I'm afraid.

Scottrf wrote:

bfchunk wrote:

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Fantastic fight. I know a lot of people don't like Prizefighter but that's the sort of contest which makes it worth watching.

Another example of the sport doing one good thing then shooting itself in the foot. Enjoyable fight now overshadowed by appalling scoring. Never written to the BBBofC before, but tempted to do so to have a right winge about that.

I have once, about their cuts rule late last year. Changed it shortly after, coincidence? 8)

I salute you

Be a good lad and write to Sky to get most of the Khan undercard shown

Reid would be better in a longer fight.

This is sad

Reid looks better in the 2nd

Webb is a strong, raw boned lad and looks to be having the best of it.

reid shouldnt be in there

All Webb

Still got webb in front.Lets see what judges do now

Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:how's everyone got this after 2 rounds??

I have Reid up by 5.

Cheers
Ian John Lewis.

I think ive got it 29-28 to webb but its no certainty as the 2nd and 3rd could go either way

damianhucker1 wrote:I think ive got it 29-28 to webb but its no certainty as the 2nd and 3rd could go either way

x2

I think reid just edged it

webb won that.

nice body shot from webb.

helped turn it his way in the last.

i dont think there can be any arguements regardless of the result

It's Webb unam; Robin not too happy :(

yeah cant argue with that really

all 3 judges for webb.

deservedly so.

Good loser, as ever against the Welsh!

At least IJL raised the correct guy's hand.

I had it 30-27

Reid can't grumble. He knew he'd not done enough.

No DeGale fight then.