BoxRec

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote: Yes your right, I dont have a hidden agenda I find it strange when someone comes on here wishing for a fighter to lose because they change promoters and why based on assumtions. People seem to forget, fighters are their own 'boss' they dont work for anyone, the managers, trainers and promoters work for them, they all get the reward out the fighter and like any 'boss' who employers workers he's going to want the best to work for him and if he feels his employee isn't getting him the best or feels he can get better out of someone else working for him he'll make those adjustments, yes buisness is ruthless at times but thats the way of the buisness world. Why should it be Ok when managers or promoters dont re new a contract with a fighter but when a 'successful' fighter doesn't re new they are frawned apon? And thats all that has obviously has happened here, Munroe hasn't broken any contract from what I can gather, he as every boxer has one shot at this sport, the side of it promoters and managers are in they have plenty of shots, they have many more years with fighters coming and going.

Now here's the thing... either you are an old poster pretending to be new, or you are a new poster displaying utter ignorance with regards to what's gone on here historically.
If, instead of charging round throwing insults at everyone, you'd taken the time to take a look around, you'd have seen plenty of occasions where various posters, including me, have been critical of the promoter-boxer relationship and its one-sided nature at times.
You're also still managing to spectacularly miss the point most people are making, which is that of course Munroe has the right to self-determination, but there's a right/professional way of doing that.

"Taken time to look around"? I'm not a wstalker wishing to act detective routing through peoples past posts, I'm interested in whats being said now and I have an opinion on whats said now, I couldn't care less whats been said before, infact your highlighting how hypocrytical you and the like can e...

The only hypocrite here is you as in your previous post you're saying you don't make assumptions and yet you've made massive assumptions here regarding other posters' views.
The fact you've also managed to hurl insults and mangle the English language in addition to this just adds to the laughable nature of your contribution to date.

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote: Now here's the thing... either you are an old poster pretending to be new, or you are a new poster displaying utter ignorance with regards to what's gone on here historically.
If, instead of charging round throwing insults at everyone, you'd taken the time to take a look around, you'd have seen plenty of occasions where various posters, including me, have been critical of the promoter-boxer relationship and its one-sided nature at times.
You're also still managing to spectacularly miss the point most people are making, which is that of course Munroe has the right to self-determination, but there's a right/professional way of doing that.

"Taken time to look around"? I'm not a wstalker wishing to act detective routing through peoples past posts, I'm interested in whats being said now and I have an opinion on whats said now, I couldn't care less whats been said before, infact your highlighting how hypocrytical you and the like can e...

The only hypocrite here is you as in your previous post you're saying you don't make assumptions and yet you've made massive assumptions here regarding other posters' views.
The fact you've also managed to hurl insults and mangle the English language in addition to this just adds to the laughable nature of your contribution to date.

But I'm not making assumtions, I'm going by what I'm reading in front of me regarding Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Malony anymore. I'm not assuming anything, you and the like are spelling it out clearly your opinions so I dont need to assume.

rickshere wrote:But I'm not making assumtions, I'm going by what I'm reading in front of me regarding Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Malony anymore. I'm not assuming anything, you and the like are spelling it out clearly your opinions so I dont need to assume.

You're not only making assumptions, you're not even reading what's in front of you in black and white. Most people are clearly saying not that Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Maloney any more, they're saying that if Maloney did only find out on Facebook then that's an unprofessional way for Monroe and his team to act. Nothing more, nothing less.

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:But I'm not making assumtions, I'm going by what I'm reading in front of me regarding Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Malony anymore. I'm not assuming anything, you and the like are spelling it out clearly your opinions so I dont need to assume.

You're not only making assumptions, you're not even reading what's in front of you in black and white. Most people are clearly saying not that Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Maloney any more, they're saying that if Maloney did only find out on Facebook then that's an unprofessional way for Monroe and his team to act. Nothing more, nothing less.

Oh I am reading whats in front of me in black and white, erm reading the posts it does 'clearly' indicate that Munroe is the 'bad guy'. To the point where some want him to actually lose because of it.

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:But I'm not making assumtions, I'm going by what I'm reading in front of me regarding Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Malony anymore. I'm not assuming anything, you and the like are spelling it out clearly your opinions so I dont need to assume.

You're not only making assumptions, you're not even reading what's in front of you in black and white. Most people are clearly saying not that Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Maloney any more, they're saying that if Maloney did only find out on Facebook then that's an unprofessional way for Monroe and his team to act. Nothing more, nothing less.

Oh I am reading whats in front of me in black and white, erm reading the posts it does 'clearly' indicate that Munroe is the 'bad guy'. To the point where some want him to actually lose because of it.

This is getting extremely tedious now so it's my last post on the matter, but logic appears to be elusive for you. The point is that most are saying that Munroe is the bad guy if it is indeed the case that he didn't inform Maloney in a professional manner.
They are NOT saying he's the bad guy simply because he's chosen to leave Maloney. That's the difference.
Now why don't you get back to hurling out insults at everyone in a childish manner as that clearly helped your argument

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote: You're not only making assumptions, you're not even reading what's in front of you in black and white. Most people are clearly saying not that Munroe is the bad guy for not being with Maloney any more, they're saying that if Maloney did only find out on Facebook then that's an unprofessional way for Monroe and his team to act. Nothing more, nothing less.

Oh I am reading whats in front of me in black and white, erm reading the posts it does 'clearly' indicate that Munroe is the 'bad guy'. To the point where some want him to actually lose because of it.

This is getting extremely tedious now so it's my last post on the matter, but logic appears to be elusive for you. The point is that most are saying that Munroe is the bad guy if it is indeed the case that he didn't inform Maloney in a professional manner.
They are NOT saying he's the bad guy simply because he's chosen to leave Maloney. That's the difference.
Now why don't you get back to hurling out insults at everyone in a childish manner as that clearly helped your argument

Tedious indeed, can't believe you just wont give it up . It's you and the like that assume Munroe left Maloney in an unprofessional way because he or his 'batty boy' (Ftm Press) say so 'reading it on facebook'. Well Munroe's trainer has explained matters on the issue on the same site, their side of story but yet not a word here about it.

Will rendall fight get shown on sky now?

leforge wrote:Will rendall fight get shown on sky now?

Sky sports 3

rickshere wrote:Well Munroe's trainer has explained matters on the issue on the same site, their side of story but yet not a word here about it.

If you'd even managed to read just this thread properly, let alone the rest of the site, you'd have seen that Taffytoon had already referenced that.

rickshere wrote:

leforge wrote:Will rendall fight get shown on sky now?

Sky sports 3

I doubt his fight will be shown probably Watson v Purdy!

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:Well Munroe's trainer has explained matters on the issue on the same site, their side of story but yet not a word here about it.

If you'd even managed to read just this thread properly, let alone the rest of the site, you'd have seen that Taffytoon had already referenced that.

Yes but did you acknowledge it that there is infact another side to the story or even make reference to it? No just silence. You having to edit your one line posts I see, try and think out your response before being to eager to press the submit button :P

.

Oops, Fail........ Again

rickshere wrote:Oops, Fail........ Again

You just can't let it go, can you? I edited my latter post because I felt there was no point trying to educate you given your clearly limited intellect. However, given you are clearly desperate for me to respond, I'll insert what I said originally:

If you actually learnt to read you'd have seen that contrary to your latest false claim I did indeed directly respond to that posting by Taffytoon so you've just embarrassed yourself once again.
Firstly you claim no-one had mentioned Munroe's management's response, yet when it is then pointed out that you are categorically wrong, instead of having the decency to acknowledge you were wrong and just hadn't read the thread properly, you try and duck it and instead try and score points by saying that it was met by the sound of silence... and guess what? Yep, you were wrong again
I edited my original post purely because I decided to tone down the language I used, as I didn't want to stoop to your level, but given your idiocy I'm less concerned about that now.
So in terms of "fails", your last two claims have been false, so I think there's only one person wearing that cap at the moment son, and it's certainly not me....

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:Oops, Fail........ Again

You just can't let it go, can you? I edited my latter post because I felt there was no point trying to educate you given your clearly limited intellect. However, given you are clearly desperate for me to respond, I'll insert what I said originally:

If you actually learnt to read you'd have seen that contrary to your latest false claim I did indeed directly respond to that posting by Taffytoon so you've just embarrassed yourself once again.
Firstly you claim no-one had mentioned Munroe's management's response, yet when it is then pointed out that you are categorically wrong, instead of having the decency to acknowledge you were wrong and just hadn't read the thread properly, you try and duck it and instead try and score points by saying that it was met by the sound of silence... and guess what? Yep, you were wrong again
I edited my original post purely because I decided to tone down the language I used, as I didn't want to stoop to your level, but given your idiocy I'm less concerned about that now.
So in terms of "fails", your last two claims have been false, so I think there's only one person wearing that cap at the moment son, and it's certainly not me....

You really are shocking and in an incredible amount of denial. I wasn't embarrased once never mind 'again'. If as you claim that you did make a response regarding the other side of the story coming to light show me where you then admitted that you was/are wrong in tarnishing the way Munroe 'supposedly' dealt with the situation. Of course you wont admit that will you because Mr Maloney (or his boyfriend) posts here and its obvious that you wouldn't want to move away from his backside, or rather more in your case you wouldn't want to stand up from your bent over position. Fail.

rickshere wrote: You really are shocking and in an incredible amount of denial. I wasn't embarrased once never mind 'again'. If as you claim that you did make a response regarding the other side of the story coming to light show me where you then admitted that you was/are wrong in tarnishing the way Munroe 'supposedly' dealt with the situation. Of course you wont admit that will you because Mr Maloney (or his boyfriend) posts here and its obvious that you wouldn't want to move away from his backside, or rather more in your case you wouldn't want to stand up from your bent over position. Fail.

Of course you're not embarrassed, because you're too stupid to grasp the concept. Let me spell it out for you:

rickshere wrote: Well Munroe's trainer has explained matters on the issue on the same site, their side of story but yet not a word here about it.

Absolutely wrong. Taffytoon directly referenced it. Fact or not?

rickshere wrote: Yes but did you acknowledge it that there is infact another side to the story or even make reference to it? No just silence.

Absolutely wrong. I made reference to it immediately after Taffytoon posted about it. Fact or not?

And your way of dealing with consistently making yourself look a fool is to respond with schoolground jibes about Maloney's 'boyfriend'. A genius riposte that leaves me in awe of your intellectual capacity

I've come across some muppets here in my time, but you are something else...

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote: You really are shocking and in an incredible amount of denial. I wasn't embarrased once never mind 'again'. If as you claim that you did make a response regarding the other side of the story coming to light show me where you then admitted that you was/are wrong in tarnishing the way Munroe 'supposedly' dealt with the situation. Of course you wont admit that will you because Mr Maloney (or his boyfriend) posts here and its obvious that you wouldn't want to move away from his backside, or rather more in your case you wouldn't want to stand up from your bent over position. Fail.

Of course you're not embarrassed, because you're too stupid to grasp the concept. Let me spell it out for you:

rickshere wrote: Well Munroe's trainer has explained matters on the issue on the same site, their side of story but yet not a word here about it.

Absolutely wrong. Taffytoon directly referenced it. Fact or not?

rickshere wrote: Yes but did you acknowledge it that there is infact another side to the story or even make reference to it? No just silence.

Absolutely wrong. I made reference to it immediately after Taffytoon posted about it. Fact or not?

And your way of dealing with consistently making yourself look a fool is to respond with schoolground jibes about Maloney's 'boyfriend'. A genius riposte that leaves me in awe of your intellectual capacity

I've come across some muppets here in my time, but you are something else...

So don't claim that you didn't failed again when you stated you edited your comment to save me embarrassment

You didn't make light or refence it to the point that you put your hands up and admit your wrong in assuming and trying to put Munroe in a bad light.

I've met some arse wipers in my take andthose willing to bend over and be shafted but you ....You are a level up! DD

rickshere wrote: So don't claim that you didn't failed again when you stated you edited your comment to save me embarrassment

If anyone out there is able to translate this muppet's comments into English I might be able to respond

do you know what , i think you two should GET A ROOM,

Darcy Delaney wrote:do you know what , i think you two should GET A ROOM,

Fair point. I'll shut up now

Deserter wrote:

Darcy Delaney wrote:do you know what , i think you two should GET A ROOM,

Fair point. I'll shut up now

Well done, about time!

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote:

Darcy Delaney wrote:do you know what , i think you two should GET A ROOM,

Fair point. I'll shut up now

Well done, about time!

It was aimed at you as well you bell-end.

Can kitty get a group hug ?

Deserter wrote:

rickshere wrote:

Deserter wrote: Fair point. I'll shut up now

Well done, about time!

It was aimed at you as well you bell-end.

No it wasn't, its obvious he's just talking about you idiot.........