Page 3 of 3

Re: Rumble In the Jungle: Rope-a-Dope

Posted: 28 Jun 2011, 16:43
by Goodnight, Irene
ThatOne wrote:You gentleman are being too critical of George Foreman. When Ali employed the rope a dope against Foreman he had the benefit of tactical surprise. That's why it never worked nearly as well in future bouts. His opponents were aware of it and planned their response.

I assure you MacArthur wasn't about to outflank the North Koreans a second team and encircle them from the rear.
Is that why the rematch never materialised, in your view?

Re: Rumble In the Jungle: Rope-a-Dope

Posted: 28 Jun 2011, 16:49
by The Second God
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
ThatOne wrote:You gentleman are being too critical of George Foreman. When Ali employed the rope a dope against Foreman he had the benefit of tactical surprise. That's why it never worked nearly as well in future bouts. His opponents were aware of it and planned their response.

I assure you MacArthur wasn't about to outflank the North Koreans a second team and encircle them from the rear.
Is that why the rematch never materialised, in your view?

Interesting question. Ali almost always gave or wanted rematches. Why didn't he?

Re: Rumble In the Jungle: Rope-a-Dope

Posted: 28 Jun 2011, 21:44
by Ambling Alp
Ezzard wrote:Whilst Foreman did punch himself out I think there were bigger factors.

Overplayed…

Ali did not take as much punishment as is written in the reports. Big shots to the body but he didn’t get hit with anything clean to the head at all. I have never thought for a single moment that he looked in danger in that fight.

Underplayed…

Foreman got hit with a lot of shots. Ali really stuck it to him. George took a lot of punishment but for the most part just stood there with little in the way of defence.

Foreman fought very poorly and yet would have still have squashed most other fighters that night. Had Ali been champion and Foreman more of the unknown quantity that Frazier fought it may have been more to his advantage. George seemed to be making the mistake all punchers fall into of believing his own hype.

I think very few of the greats would have lost that fight with the same tactics employed.
I agree with some of that but not all of it. Ali never got hit clean to head? Seriously? Foreman nailed him to the head several times in that fight and nothing happened. Ali took his best and Foreman had no plan B.

Foreman was pretty well known before he fought Frazier. He won the gold Medal in the 1968 Olympics when that was still a big deal. Next to Ali and Frazier, he may hve been the most known heavyweight, at least to fight fans.

Re: Rumble In the Jungle: Rope-a-Dope

Posted: 28 Jun 2011, 21:46
by Ambling Alp
The Second God wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
ThatOne wrote:You gentleman are being too critical of George Foreman. When Ali employed the rope a dope against Foreman he had the benefit of tactical surprise. That's why it never worked nearly as well in future bouts. His opponents were aware of it and planned their response.

I assure you MacArthur wasn't about to outflank the North Koreans a second team and encircle them from the rear.
Is that why the rematch never materialised, in your view?

Interesting question. Ali almost always gave or wanted rematches. Why didn't he?
This is one of those questions that pops up from time to time. Foreman didn't fight again until 1976. He didn't take the loss well. By the time he came back, there were other contenders a head of him. Then he lost to Young in 1977.

Re: Rumble In the Jungle: Rope-a-Dope

Posted: 29 Jun 2011, 11:24
by The Second God
Ambling Alp wrote:
The Second God wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote: Is that why the rematch never materialised, in your view?

Interesting question. Ali almost always gave or wanted rematches. Why didn't he?
This is one of those questions that pops up from time to time. Foreman didn't fight again until 1976. He didn't take the loss well. By the time he came back, there were other contenders a head of him. Then he lost to Young in 1977.
I picked up a book he wrote for a couple bucks at a discount store. I think it was something about God in his corner, something like that. He talks about his spiritual epiphany after one of his fights. George is a good man. I'm glad to see that he's had successes that have nothing to do with the ring. His life could have easily turned out much differently.

Re: Rumble In the Jungle: Rope-a-Dope

Posted: 15 Jul 2011, 21:28
by I Feel Fine
Yes, a lot of guys would have destroyed Ali the night of the Rumble in the Jungle.
Joe Louis in the pre-war years would have won every second.
Max Baer in his prime, easily.
Mike Tyson at his best would have eaten Ali alive.
Peak Dempsey would have broken every bone in Ali's body.
George Foreman in his prime would have killed Ali that ni... hmm, wait.

Things can be made to sound easier than they actually are.