Page 3 of 3

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 24 Jun 2011, 17:54
by Gray-Fox
Read this on another forum a few days ago:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:25 am
I was told last month by a very trusted, knowledable colleague that either a Scots or Welsh boxer would win gold but not an English boxer, that Englands nominated official would be rejected by AIBA and that the current English defending champion would lose his title. So far thats 2 out of 3 he's got right. Be interested to see whether the remaining boxers are subject to controversial decisions.

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 03:28
by Tommy Gunn13
Gray-Fox wrote:Read this on another forum a few days ago:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:25 am
I was told last month by a very trusted, knowledable colleague that either a Scots or Welsh boxer would win gold but not an English boxer, that Englands nominated official would be rejected by AIBA and that the current English defending champion would lose his title. So far thats 2 out of 3 he's got right. Be interested to see whether the remaining boxers are subject to controversial decisions.
Mmm interesting...

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 09:00
by bigped
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:
Gray-Fox wrote:Read this on another forum a few days ago:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:25 am
I was told last month by a very trusted, knowledable colleague that either a Scots or Welsh boxer would win gold but not an English boxer, that Englands nominated official would be rejected by AIBA and that the current English defending champion would lose his title. So far thats 2 out of 3 he's got right. Be interested to see whether the remaining boxers are subject to controversial decisions.
Mmm interesting...
what you think of programme tommy pretty intense stuff there you not think?

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 09:02
by Tommy Gunn13
Yes i enjoyed it.i thought my old man was pushy when i was younger,but nothing like them parents...

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 10:03
by Matt W
Gray-Fox wrote:Read this on another forum a few days ago:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:25 am
I was told last month by a very trusted, knowledable colleague that either a Scots or Welsh boxer would win gold but not an English boxer, that Englands nominated official would be rejected by AIBA and that the current English defending champion would lose his title. So far thats 2 out of 3 he's got right. Be interested to see whether the remaining boxers are subject to controversial decisions.
England didn't have a defending champion?

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 14:38
by mickey1975
Matt W wrote:
Gray-Fox wrote:Read this on another forum a few days ago:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:25 am
I was told last month by a very trusted, knowledable colleague that either a Scots or Welsh boxer would win gold but not an English boxer, that Englands nominated official would be rejected by AIBA and that the current English defending champion would lose his title. So far thats 2 out of 3 he's got right. Be interested to see whether the remaining boxers are subject to controversial decisions.
England didn't have a defending champion?
Luke Campbell?

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 25 Jun 2011, 15:21
by Tommy Gunn13
mickey1975 wrote:
Matt W wrote:
Gray-Fox wrote:Read this on another forum a few days ago:
England didn't have a defending champion?
Luke Campbell?
He wasnt the defending champion,he won it the time before...

Re: European Championships (amateurs)

Posted: 26 Jun 2011, 06:09
by Gray-Fox
What the comment highlights is the blatant corruption and politics in the am game. It's more rife than people think.

That wasn't just a potshot in the dark. If you remember Rob McCracken was banned before the event too...