BoxRec

BoxBuzz wrote:At least I have offered proof in the case of Duran=Haggard.

Yes, very funny and creative (not being sarcastic - I liked it).

Only one small favor I have to ask, next time please give me the benefit of the doubt - in other words, I would appreciate it if you asked me for clarity on a statement before you call me a name.

I take no offense - I understand the confusion (nowadays one never knows); don’t worry, I’m very “thick skinned” and have been called much worse names by so-called friends/family (please, don’t ask for details)…

kal.majeed wrote:

BoxBuzz wrote:At least I have offered proof in the case of Duran=Haggard.

Yes, very funny and creative (not being sarcastic - I liked it).

Only one small favor I have to ask, next time please give me the benefit of the doubt - in other words, I would appreciate it if you asked me for clarity on a statement before you call me a name.

I take no offense - I understand the confusion (nowadays one never knows); don’t worry, I’m very “thick skinned” and have been called much worse names by so-called friends/family (please, don’t ask for details)…

Buzz didn't call you a name. Buzz never calls anybody a name when he insults them. He uses more creative methods.

As usual Mr. 'attorney' you are correct - it was 'Brett Paul Dunbar' (and a couple others) that called me a 'loon' without asking me to clarify my statement...

I apologize 'BoxBuzz' - please accept my apology...

By the way Mr. raylawpc, what is your feedback/opinion about the 'verdict' from yesterday (Casey Anthony)...

kal.majeed wrote:As usual Mr. 'attorney' you are correct - it was 'Brett Paul Dunbar' (and a couple others) that called me a 'loon' without asking me to clarify my statement...

I apologize 'BoxBuzz' - please accept my apology...

By the way Mr. raylawpc, what is your feedback/opinion about the 'verdict' from yesterday (Casey Anthony)...

You sure are fixated on the notion of me being an attorney. Are you sure you haven't been arrested?

I didn't follow the trial. I have better and more enjoyable things to do with my life . . . such as posting on boxrec.com

Did you notice that I put 'attorney' in a quote typesetting - it was not a direct reference (have I offended you??)...

I didn't follow the trial either but one has to wonder - if she didn't have anything to do with it, who did (and why does she look guilty rather than angry)??

If someone harmed a loved one of yours -would you feel 'guilty' or ANGRY?!?!?!

Nope, I'm pretty hard to offend. But unless I am a boxer, manager, promoter, trainer/cornerman/cutman, ringside physician, publicist, matchmaker, judge or referee, what I do for a living is totally irrelevant to discussions on boxrec.com.

The questions you are asking about the defendant's demeanor are questions for a psychologist or psychiatrist. I'm neither.

Let's move back to boxing. . .

raylawpc wrote:Nope, I'm pretty hard to offend. But unless I am a boxer, manager, promoter, trainer/cornerman/cutman, ringside physician, publicist, matchmaker, judge or referee, what I do for a living is totally irrelevant to discussions on boxrec.com.

The questions you are asking about the defendant's demeanor are questions for a psychologist or psychiatrist. I'm neither.

Let's move back to boxing. . .

Do you believe that "history repeats itself" (in boxing) or are the consistencies merely coincidences???

For example: Look at the comparison between Monzon and Hagler – all merely coincidences or the proverbial “hand-of-fate” (or maybe a little of both)???

kal.majeed wrote:

raylawpc wrote:Nope, I'm pretty hard to offend. But unless I am a boxer, manager, promoter, trainer/cornerman/cutman, ringside physician, publicist, matchmaker, judge or referee, what I do for a living is totally irrelevant to discussions on boxrec.com.

The questions you are asking about the defendant's demeanor are questions for a psychologist or psychiatrist. I'm neither.

Let's move back to boxing. . .

Do you believe that "history repeats itself" (in boxing) or are the consistencies merely coincidences???

For example: Look at the comparison between Monzon and Hagler – all merely coincidences or the proverbial “hand-of-fate” (or maybe a little of both)???

I haven't really thought about it, and don't really care.

kal.majeed wrote:As usual Mr. 'attorney' you are correct - it was 'Brett Paul Dunbar' (and a couple others) that called me a 'loon' without asking me to clarify my statement...

I apologize 'BoxBuzz' - please accept my apology...

By the way Mr. raylawpc, what is your feedback/opinion about the 'verdict' from yesterday (Casey Anthony)...

You appear to think these coincidences mean something, they don't they're just coincidences. If you trawl a large enough mass of data you find coincidences. Combined with the other bizarre comments, such as that all events are meaningful, you have made that puts you pretty clearly in the loon category.

Brett Paul Dunbar wrote:

kal.majeed wrote:As usual Mr. 'attorney' you are correct - it was 'Brett Paul Dunbar' (and a couple others) that called me a 'loon' without asking me to clarify my statement...

I apologize 'BoxBuzz' - please accept my apology...

By the way Mr. raylawpc, what is your feedback/opinion about the 'verdict' from yesterday (Casey Anthony)...

You appear to think these coincidences mean something, they don't they're just coincidences. If you trawl a large enough mass of data you find coincidences. Combined with the other bizarre comments, such as that all events are meaningful, you have made that puts you pretty clearly in the loon category.

First, I'm not here to quarrel or combat with anyone; so, let’s put that aside and try to have an adult conversation, OK?

I believe I was initially speaking to ‘Second God’ who stated that he believed that life was meaningless – and I tried to say (in general) that everyone and everything has meaning and significance (I was not referring to the boxer comparisons but just humanity – in general).

With regards to the boxer comparisons, I have stated not once but twice that they are merely (for those interested) to educate/entertain – scroll back through the comments and check.

I’m not sure what you are specifically referring to when you say “other bizarre comments” so I cannot explain without you being a little more specific.

kal.majeed wrote:

Brett Paul Dunbar wrote: You appear to think these coincidences mean something, they don't they're just coincidences. If you trawl a large enough mass of data you find coincidences. Combined with the other bizarre comments, such as that all events are meaningful, you have made that puts you pretty clearly in the loon category.

First, I'm not here to quarrel or combat with anyone; so, let’s put that aside and try to have an adult conversation, OK?

I believe I was initially speaking to ‘Second God’ who stated that he believed that life was meaningless – and I tried to say (in general) that everyone and everything has meaning and significance (I was not referring to the boxer comparisons but just humanity – in general).

Many things are meaningless, stuff happens without any significance all of the things about boxing you have mentioned fall into this category.

kal.majeed wrote:With regards to the boxer comparisons, I have stated not once but twice that they are merely (for those interested) to educate/entertain – scroll back through the comments and check.

I’m not sure what you are specifically referring to when you say “other bizarre comments” so I cannot explain without you being a little more specific.

This for example:

kal.majeed wrote:It exposes the vast incompetence, deceptions and outright lies within scientific, philosophical and cultural data – as it pertains to the Universe (in general). Now, I’m sure you are sensible enough to see that this can be perceived as an ‘attack’ by those communities (in general) and the great many problems and consequences that may result. The publisher has been concerned about the potential ‘trouble’ and I believe (once they see all the data) may option out their support.

That is just conspiracy theorising. And a load of utter rubbish.

Wow, this thread is a hemorrhoid.

To Paul:

You stated: "Many things are meaningless, stuff happens without any significance all of the things about boxing you have mentioned fall into this category."

In a general sense, you are correct - so we can leave that one alone, OK?

You stated: "That is just conspiracy theorizing. And a load of utter rubbish."

All the claims within my book are fully backed up with the necessary data or I would not have a basis to produce a work as such.

To SaadOffTheDeck: I'm sorry...

LOL, don't worry about it. I'll live.

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:LOL, don't worry about it. I'll live.

By the way, how have you been - did you enjoy the 'fight'??? LOL!?!?! Referring to Klitschko-Haye

kal.majeed wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:LOL, don't worry about it. I'll live.

By the way, how have you been - did you enjoy the 'fight'??? LOL!?!?! Referring to Klitschko-Haye

I'm fine, the fight was an hour of my life that I'll never get back. Abysmal at best.