You did say that you wouldn't post again, but experience told me that the mere mention of Mr Rhodes would prove to harsh a test for your resolve, always doestwenty six wrote:James,
I did say I wouldn't write again, but I have to reply to your post.
First of all, I have no axe to grind with Warren / Ayling. In fact if you read my post I'm sticking up for them here.
OK, I'm banned from their shows for having the audacity to post on here on certain subjects, but hey that's life !!
The purse money is the Promotor's - until such time as the fighter has earned it.
Gavin going on about his money is not clever.
Secondly, as you have developed this into a discussion re Rhodes (which is a bit weird and irrelevent to the topic) the only reason the Small fight did not happen was due to Rhodes back injury.
That is documented with the Board and supported by medical evidence.
Sticking up for them, do me a favour! You're just taking a shot from a different angle, that's all.
I could, but I'm not going to get into that situation with you. My intention isn't to drag Ryan's name through the mud, rather to present you an analogy of how thing's in boxing aren't always as they seem. If you who can't be questioned says they are, I guess they must be
