Is Harrison going slow?

Chambers · Post by **Chambers** » 23 Jan 2004, 08:21

beduff wrote:its 20/1 to win a proper world title,not beat up a pair of hasbeens like hide and sprott.

beduff · Post by **beduff** » 23 Jan 2004, 08:24

although hide would be a step up in class.

Chambers · Post by **Chambers** » 23 Jan 2004, 08:28

beduff wrote:its 20/1 to win a proper world title,not beat up a pair of hasbeens like hide and sprott.

Do you not rate Herbie and Sprott then, as well as not rating Audley? Do you rate Danny or Long? what about Lennox is he any good?

beduff · Post by **beduff** » 23 Jan 2004, 08:32

dont talk about lewis and audley in the same breath,lewis a proven world champion,audley a great talker decent boxer who will never be in the same leauge as lewis.and u know it

Chambers · Post by **Chambers** » 23 Jan 2004, 08:44

beduff wrote:dont talk about lewis and audley in the same breath,lewis a proven world champion,audley a great talker decent boxer who will never be in the same leauge as lewis.and u know it

I was obviously not comparing Audley and Lennox (although they are both Olympic champions and professional HW's, Lennox also took alot of stick early on in his career)

I was making a reference to the constant negative comments made about boxers, do you like or rate anyone or is it just Lewis, Ali, Joe Louis etc and the rest are crap Hasbeens?

beduff · Post by **beduff** » 23 Jan 2004, 09:00

no,i just dont like boxers who keep on about things and never produce.the thing you call negative is what others call the truth,audley talks a lot of shit and in my opion is not good enough to win a world title simple as.chambers wahat is your associaction with audley?arse licker?

jameswilson · Post by **jameswilson** » 23 Jan 2004, 09:24

Did you actually see Audley's last fight the hand speed and footwork were outstanding the uppercuts would have put most heavyweights out as well. He is improving and I believe he has stepped up in class with each of his fights.

Chambers · Post by **Chambers** » 23 Jan 2004, 09:33

beduff wrote:no,i just dont like boxers who keep on about things and never produce.the thing you call negative is what others call the truth,audley talks a lot of shit and in my opion is not good enough to win a world title simple as.chambers wahat is your associaction with audley?arse licker?

Audley has said he will be world champion by the middle of 2005, so how as he not produced? He said he was going to win the Commonwealth and Olympic games and produced both times. Where exactly has he not produced, he is learning the pro game by training hard and steadily increasing his level of opponent as virtually every other prospect has

He is not the first boxer to say he is going to be World Champion, what do you expect an Olympic champion to say
"I might make it European title holder and break into the top ten, but I can't see myself going much further than that" . Personally I like boxers to show abit of confidence, the sport needs characters, I bet you were one if the people who couldn't wait for Naz to lose as he was too cocky.

I have no association with Audley other than being a fan.

Do you have any constructive critism regarding Audley? or are you just sitting there with your arms folded saying "Audley is crap I don't know why he is crap he just is". I like to base my opinions on boxers and people by facts.

Can you please try and respond in a grown-up manner (referring to your arse-licker comments, I find it highly unlikely that Audley reads internet forums), by the way How old are you?
The only reason I am taking time out to argue with you is because I have some work to do, and I don't want to do it.

jameswilson · Post by **jameswilson** » 23 Jan 2004, 09:42

Tell him Chambers, the only truthful thing beduff has said is Aud isn't good enough to win a world title, it's true he aint good enough now. But he will be come 2005 so what crap is Audley speaking then Beduff, saying he is gonna be World champ, which top heavyweights don't say that.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 23 Jan 2004, 09:45

Well said.

The truth of the matter is this.

Had Audley just been another prospect without the media fanfare and ballyhoo and the gold medal, everyone would be saying how great he was, and how he was the best chance we have for a successor to Lennox Lewis.

Audley is doing what any fledgling professional fighter does, taking low risk fights which allow him to translate gym work into real fights.

beduff · Post by **beduff** » 23 Jan 2004, 09:50

im 21,if thats any buisness of yours,you start a topic and you get peoples opions and if you dont like them thats your fault.i have already give my opion of audley,and stick by it,he is a decent boxer nothing more,not a world champion,he will never ever be world number 1,the heavyweight division is weak at the moment[apart from 1 or 2]and audley still wont be good enough im afraid.as for your comments on naz i infact like him at least he won world titles.so again dont talk about audley in the same breath as a world champion becuase he aint and never will be one.british/european champion yes,a proper world champion no.he is all talk.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 23 Jan 2004, 11:40

I think Audley must have shagged Beduff's girlfriend/sister/mum/all three or something, there's definetly an Agenda going on.

Hang on, you aren't allegedly are you?

beduff · Post by **beduff** » 23 Jan 2004, 17:27

no agenda,just my opion,u keep on believing all the hipe.